bureaucratic organization!

[Thomas C. Weedon]

Buddy,
The rules proposals that were submitted to AMA was posted on this list about
a month ago. There was no rule proposal for a weight limit change because
the membership did not approve such a change. In a series of three questions
on the original ballot, the members voted "no change", by a slim majority.
Better luck next time, or write your own proposal and submit it. That is
your privilege.
Tom
  -----Original Message-----
  From: discussion-request at nsrca.org [mailto:discussion-request at nsrca.org]On
Behalf Of Buddy Brammer
  Sent: Saturday, October 26, 2002 2:08 PM
  To: discussion at nsrca.org
  Subject: Re: bureaucratic organization!


  Tony I agree. Does anyone know if the weight change proposal was submitted
to AMA by anyone?

  Buddy



  >From: "Tony Stillman"
  >Reply-To: discussion at nsrca.org
  >To:
  >Subject: Re: bureaucratic organization!
  >Date: Thu, 24 Oct 2002 19:44:31 -0500
  >
  >Troy:
  >
  >One correction. NSRCA proposals do NOT get an automatic pass on the
initial vote.
  >
  >This changed about 6 years ago. As a matter of fact, An NSRCA past
President, Rick Allison, spent long hours writing a proposal to help
counteract this change. However, it ended up being thrown out by the AMA
Exec. Counsel.
  >
  >I am in total support of ANY AMA member sending in proposals. Past
surveys prove that NSRCA can't think of everything that needs to be done.
Many things can be missed, or not even thought of. It is also very easy to
just sit back and let NSRCA handle everything. Don't do that! That's the
problem with the "silent majority" of our country now! We don't vote, and so
we end up with what we get.
  >
  >It takes nerve to stand up for your ideas. Good job, Troy.
  >
  >Tony Stillman
  >Radio South
  >3702 N. Pace Blvd.
  >Pensacola, FL 32505
  >www.radiosouthrc.com
  >
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.f3a.us/pipermail/nsrca-discussion/attachments/20021027/08bca6fd/attachment.html