Sequence creation is tough....Nsrca Role

Ann & Dave Burton burtona at bellsouth.net
Sat Oct 26 09:16:35 AKDT 2002


Troy,
There was another sequence submitted as a rule change for consideration
by the Contest Board.
It's to fly the most current preliminary FAI sequance as a separate
Masters class.



Troy Newman wrote:

> Del did you fill out the NSRCA rules survey that was in your KF? If
> you did then the survey that was taken at the NATS is the exact same
> document you had input on! We just saved some postage that's all! In
> fact the first time many of us had seen it was at the NATS. Many of us
> got our KF's there while the postman was delivering to the rest of
> you. Nothing back room about it.....Just like this sequence was not
> backroom....Conspiracy theories can pull us all down. Look at what is
> in front of you. Don't read things into how it got there...rather
> decide which one you want! If your choice is none of the above then
> tell your Board member to fail both proposals! The leadership of the
> NSRCA is not trying to backdoor you. Rather sometimes it can't get
> your personal opinion.... Many people were going over the latest KF at
> the NATS just as many do at local contests....We were all looking for
> something new...and trying to bounce ideas off each other regarding
> the rules survey that was enclosed. The NATS just like local contests
> is a good place for brainstorming the reason you have 130 pattern
> flyers all there at the same time...face to face. How many survey's
> got sent in...200 right...well I bet 130 came from the NATS
> competitors. The conception of our option sequence was done with a
> beer in one hand and the Windex bottle cleaning a plane in the other.
> Standing in the parking lot of Site #2 and trying to decide where we
> were all going for dinner. Nothing more nothing less. Del if I would
> have known you wanted to go to dinner with us I would have asked.
> Sorry man. Eric's right when your down everybody takes a shot! That's
> not right! We need to get off this Eric bashing. Its not constructive.
> This Masters 2005 option is merely that....a take it or leave it
> option. You have 3 choices Survey Results of Seq #1. The D6 Option Seq
> or no change. Given these options what do you choose?...because that
> is the choice...I wish somebody had submitted another Masters sequence
> then we would have 4 choices....but alas there are only 3. I hate to
> sound cold shoulder to you Del but relax man....We are not out to get
> you. I'm just a pattern flyer just like you. Next we meet I'll be
> happy to buy you a beer....but you gotta relax man this is for
> fun!  Troy
>
>      ----- Original Message -----
>      From: Del Rykert
>      Sent: Saturday, October 26, 2002 6:16 AM
>      To: discussion at nsrca.org
>      Subject: Re: Sequence creation is tough....Nsrca Role
>        Its a tough job. The idea was see if we could do a better
>      job....not tear down what had been done.  As for input asked
>      for to create the survey yes there was time.....The idea
>      came while filling out the survey at the NATS...and many
>      like the choice of none of the above!
>
>           What Survey at the Nats...I wasn't aware of any
>           survey being done at the NATS.  Was this also
>           shared with the rest of the membership or was this
>           back room politics?  My concern is not all that
>           care are given an equal opportunity to shape and
>           make their choices.       Del K. Rykert
>                AMA - 8928
>                NSRCA - 473
>                Kb2joi - General
>
>
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------
> Get more from the Web. FREE MSN Explorer download :
> http://explorer.msn.com

--
-----------------------------------------------------
Click here for Free Video!!
http://www.gohip.com/free_video/


=====================================
# To be removed from this list, send a message to 
# discussion-request at nsrca.org
# and put leave discussion on the first line of the body.
#



More information about the NSRCA-discussion mailing list