2005 Rules Proposals

Bob Pastorello rcaerobob at cox.net
Wed Oct 9 18:27:22 AKDT 2002


I appreciate Ron V. submitting this Annex thing....guys, this is a potential
"sure cure" to the sequence issues.
    Good move, Ron.

And for those voters of the 185 submissions that thought so, too.

Bob Pastorello
NSRCA 199, AMA 46373
rcaerobob at cox.net
www.rcaerobats.net


----- Original Message -----
From: "Ron Van Putte" <vanputte at nuc.net>
To: <discussion at nsrca.org>
Sent: Wednesday, October 09, 2002 9:41 PM
Subject: Re: 2005 Rules Proposals


>
>
> Thomas C. Weedon wrote:
>
>
> > It was suggested that I post the proposed rules that I submitted to the
AMA
> > Rules Committee on Sept 30. I hope that I did not make any mistakes in
these
> > submissions. The rules proposals were based on the responses that we
> > received from our membership. There were about 185 members that returned
the
> > surveys. The material was then condensed and rewritten for clarity, then
put
> > on the proper form for the AMA Competition Board. Please take your time
> > going over these proposals and then let your AMA Contest Board know your
> > feelings and opinions concerning them.
>
>
> I also submitted an annex proposal based on the survey responses.  It
> would remove the maneuver descriptions and maneuver schedules from the
> AMA rule book and put them in an annex which would be controlled and
> published by NSRCA.  Changes to either the maneuver descriptions or the
> maneuver schedules would be based on 60% affirmative responses to
> surveys of NSRCA members via either the K-Factor or direct mailing.  The
> maneuver descriptions and schedules would be published by the end of
> September every year (even if there were no changes).  The maneuver
> schedules would be published in the NSRCA and AMA web sites, in the
> K-Factor and in Model Aviation.  The maneuver descriptions would be
> published in the NSRCA and AMA web sites.  Changed maneuver schedules
> would be effective on the first of January after publication.
>
> Ron Van Putte
>
>
>
> =====================================
> # To be removed from this list, send a message to
> # discussion-request at nsrca.org
> # and put leave discussion on the first line of the body.
> #
>

=====================================
# To be removed from this list, send a message to 
# discussion-request at nsrca.org
# and put leave discussion on the first line of the body.
#



More information about the NSRCA-discussion mailing list