AMA Magazine Article - the paragraph

[Anthony Romano]

Can we all show how big we are and just turn the other cheek. Let this drop 
already.

Sorry for wasting bandwith

Anthony


>From: "Henderson,Eric" <eric.henderson at gartner.com>
>Reply-To: discussion at nsrca.org
>To: "'discussion at nsrca.org'" <discussion at nsrca.org>
>Subject: RE: AMA Magazine Article - the paragraph
>Date: Wed, 2 Oct 2002 12:02:34 -0400
>
>If I printed what you all have said about IMAC I'd be deported!
>
>
>I write about promoting the sport, the ways to get in, the new "toys".
>Stories from pilots that are interesting. Dave Vilwok and Frank Grannelli
>for example. I have not yet printed any bad IMAC letters because, you know
>what, a) Don't get any, b) would not any way. That's MY choice. Mike H.
>wrote HIS choice and he had every right to do so.
>
>If you don't like what he said you tell him or the AMA editors etc. If you
>don't like what I write, ditto. BUT I won't let you tell me to make Mike
>apologize. Not going to happen.
>
>Regards,
>
>Eric.
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Martin X. Moleski, SJ [mailto:moleski at canisius.edu]
>Sent: Wednesday, October 02, 2002 10:22 AM
>To: discussion at nsrca.org
>Cc: m.hurley at attbi.com; dbrown at dbproducts.com; rkurek at modelaircraft.org
>Subject: Re: AMA Magazine Article - the paragraph
>
>
>--On Wednesday, October 02, 2002 9:42 AM -0400 Van - E-Mail LIST
><extra330 at tampabay.rr.com> wrote:
>
> > An apology from him is silly, he has done NOTHING to warrant
> > even asking
>
>I respectfully disagree with you.
>
> > ... You are reading WAY WAY too much into this. Let it go.
>
>Authors and editors should exercise sound judgment about
>what they publish in MA.
>
>Nothing people say at the field can get into the
>magazine unless the authors and editors decide to
>print it.
>
>Should MA publish some of the things I've heard about
>the boorish behavior of IMAC flyers at local fields
>in Muncie?  Should they put stuff like that in just
>because some AMA members resent the loss of practice
>fields due to the way IMAC members behaved during
>their nats?  I think not.
>
>There should be a policy in force in OUR magazine that
>some things said by one group of AMA members against
>another group should not be published.
>
>I've gotten tired of beaming this message at our
>elected representives using ESP.  They seem not to
>be listening.  So I'm trying e-mail today.  Do you
>suppose any of them will respond?
>
>					Marty #2874
>=====================================
># To be removed from this list, send a message to
># discussion-request at nsrca.org
># and put leave discussion on the first line of the body.
>#
>=====================================
># To be removed from this list, send a message to
># discussion-request at nsrca.org
># and put leave discussion on the first line of the body.
>#




_________________________________________________________________
Send and receive Hotmail on your mobile device: http://mobile.msn.com

=====================================
# To be removed from this list, send a message to 
# discussion-request at nsrca.org
# and put leave discussion on the first line of the body.
#