AMA Magazine Article - the paragraph

[Rcmaster199 at aol.com]

Yes Mike I agree, we have beaten this one pretty much to death. Time to move 
on I think. There are other more important issues to tackle

Matt K


In a message dated 10/1/2002 8:24:40 PM Eastern Daylight Time, 
kerlock at attbi.com writes:


> Subj:Re: AMA Magazine Article - the paragraph 
> Date:10/1/2002 8:24:40 PM Eastern Daylight Time
> From:<A HREF="mailto:kerlock at attbi.com">kerlock at attbi.com</A>
> Reply-to:<A HREF="mailto:discussion at nsrca.org">discussion at nsrca.org</A>
> To:<A HREF="mailto:discussion at nsrca.org">discussion at nsrca.org</A>
> Sent from the Internet 
> 
> 
> 
> Larry,
> 
> I wouldn't get that stressed over it. Don't get me wrong, it hit me the
> wrong way too, but it's best to let it slide. If people want to know what
> pattern is all about, they aren't usually looking in the Scale Aerobatics
> column of MA. The problem is there's really no way to respond to it without
> looking bad ourselves. It was an irresponsible statement on his part, and
> maybe he indeed had a bad experience. We can't change that.
 Mike Hester


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.f3a.us/pipermail/nsrca-discussion/attachments/20021001/5b466bee/attachment.html