NATs Participation

[ronlock]

Some of the reason for lower IMAC attendance last summer may have 
been the enforcement of a noise rule for IMAC birds.

Ron Lockhart
  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: Buddy Brammer 
  To: discussion at nsrca.org 
  Sent: Wednesday, November 13, 2002 6:35 PM
  Subject: RE: Weight Limit


  Tom / Bill

  IMAC attendance was also down at the NAT's last year. Compared to pattern they had far less participation on a percentage basis of overall membership than pattern.

  Might be that many IMAC mambers don't compete in contest's?

  Buddy  



  >From: "Thomas C. Weedon" 
  >Reply-To: discussion at nsrca.org 
  >To: 
  >Subject: RE: Weight Limit 
  >Date: Wed, 13 Nov 2002 17:42:19 -0500 
  > 
  >Bill, 
  >The latest that I have heard is that they have experienced some drop outs 
  >after the orginal excitment a few years ago which leaves them around 800 
  >members. The IMAC contests up here have been down on attendance over this 
  >last year. Tom Wheeler told me that they were tight on money and could not 
  >afford to publish a magazine without a loss. That's why they were pushing 
  >their on-line issue. Now that they have joined with RC Excellance magazine, 
  >their publishing problems my go away. Just my observations. I still want to 
  >fly IMAC when I have the time. I have 2 good planes (only 80"w.s. though) 
  >Tom W. 
  > 
  FREE* 
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.f3a.us/pipermail/nsrca-discussion/attachments/20021113/ce495591/attachment.html