New Fuel Technology - PowerMaster
RSBXON at aol.com
RSBXON at aol.com
Tue Nov 12 16:58:52 AKST 2002
I have been doing some research on new fuel technology and had the
opportunity to ask for help from Wendell Hammond of PowerMaster Fuels
recently. Specifically I was looking for a high quality fuel to run in the
my OS 140 EFI with the objectives of eliminating bearing corrosion, lowering
the operating temperature and increasing main bearing life.
As it turns out, Powermaster has been developing new fuels for both the YS 4
stroke and OS two stroke engines. Powermaster has worked with some
state-of-the-art oil and corrosion inhibitor manufacturers and have developed
a new low viscosity fuel that appears to meet all of the objectives I have
been working toward. I asked Wendell if I could try them out in my OS 140
Electronic Fuel Injection engine (onboard computer and sensors that track
both RPM - instantaneous and maximum, and Cylinder head temperature -
instantaneous and maximum). These onboard sensors make the engine a good
candidate to test new fuels. Powermaster provided a 20% nitro blend of the
PowerPac fuel along with the standard Powermaster YS 20/20 fuel.
I ran both the Powermaster 20/20 and the Powermaster 20% Powerpac Low
viscosity fuels and compared the data versus other fuels from reputable
manufacturers that I have been using. The table below shows the results for
the full throttle sustained RPM and the cylinder head temperature on a
consistent fuel injector setting. The engine is propped with a 17/12 APC
wide blade which is a relatively high load and is fully cowled in a PL
products Smaragd airframe. The day I did the test, the temperature was 93
degrees F and high humidity.
Fuel Nitro content Max RPM Cylinder
head temp - deg C
Powermaster PowerPac 20% nitro 7800 122
degrees
Powermaster YS 20/20 20% 7650 134
degrees
Brand ZZ 25-30% 7600
149 degrees
Brand ZZ 20% 7500
134 degrees
Brand XX 20% 7500
142 degrees
The Powermaster powerpac 20% low viscosity fuel gave 300 more RPM and the
cylinder head temperature was the lowest by far (122 degrees C vs 149
degrees C for the Brand ZZ fuel). This means that the engine was producing
more horsepower and the engine actually ran cooler with the Powermaster
powerpac fuel. Also the regular Power master YS 20/20 blend showed good
performance in terms of higher RPM and lower cylinder head temperature as
compared to other fuels. My conclusion is that that not all fuels of the
same nitro percentage are the same. !!!! Also new fuel/ oil technology has
the potential to translate into reduced bearing / mechanical wear with the
lower operating temperatures. Also the proprietary corrosion inhibitors have
the potential to eliminate bearing corrosion. I understand that YS engines
may be recommending this new fuel for the YS DZ fuel injected engine in a 30%
nitro blend. Also some of the helicopter guys are running the fuel in very
high stress environments.
I have flown several flights with the Powermaster Powerpac low viscosity fuel
and really like the way the engine runs. It puts out a smokey exhaust
trail which generally indicates a good, rich setting (safe for the engine)
and excellent power. The engine was set for 7800 RPM on the ground and
showed a maximum 8250 RPM in the air (the onboard computer captures the max
RPM). It was clear that the Powermaster powerpac low viscosity fuel provided
the best power and smooth performance in the air.
This information is provided solely to gain insight on the technology
improvements for fuel manufacturing. I am not sponsored by Powermaster.
If you have interest in some new fuel alternatives, contact PowerMaster and
Wendell Hammond and see their website. Wendell is very knowledgeable and
great to work with.
Note: I am not bashing other fuel manufacturers and will not disclose the
real names of the other fuel manufacturers shown above -- they make good
products as well.
Ron Barr
AMA 6507
NSRCA 249
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.f3a.us/pipermail/nsrca-discussion/attachments/20021112/c2347ff3/attachment.html
More information about the NSRCA-discussion
mailing list