Weight Limit/cost
Terry Terrenoire
amad2terry at juno.com
Tue Nov 12 02:08:55 AKST 2002
Just to confirm this:
I am currently building a Synergy
Kit cost $875
Engine $500, YS 1.40 L
Header $40
4 digital servos $360
Paint and Monokote $100?
Ball bearing controls $40
Pilot $10
Wheels $30
Add another misc $100 and you have a total of $2055
And this is with top equipment. Have not purchased a pipe yet and the
throttle servo is a 132 from my inventory.
Eliminate the ballbearing hardware, and digital servos and you're back
under $2000.
Terry T.
On Mon, 11 Nov 2002 20:35:00 -0600 "Keith Black" <tkeithb at attbi.com>
writes:
> > BTW you mentioned being competitive with a $1500 plane. If true
> why are
> > the "top boys" flying planes were the radio/receiver/servos along
> cost
> $1500?
>
> What I said was one could be competitive by spending $1500 to $2000
> and I
> feel that this is the case. That's not to say that the "big boys",
> or even
> the well financed guy at the local club, won't spend more. Obviously
> that
> dollar figure doesn't assume you get a ready built plane from
> someone like
> PLProd. BTW, I wasn't including the transmitter in that figure as
> most
> people in the hobby have a TX they fly multiple planes with (even
> the sport
> guys). You can get a name brand JR or Futaba radio with lots extras
> like
> multi-model support, dual rates, exponential, programmable mixes,
> etc. for
> $250.
>
> As to the $1500 to $2000 figure consider the following: Top notch
> JR
> digitals on all flight surfaces for around $400 to $500, Webra 1.45
> or OS
> 1.40RX - $395.00 to $450, Hitec receiver for $60, competitive
> cutting edge
> kit or ARC for $425 to $700 (in my case I'm building an Aries from
> AeroSlave, but you can also go with others or even get an ARC Focus
> for
> $595). Add another $300 or so for building supplies, landing gear,
> spinner,
> linkages, etc.
>
> That comes to right around $2000 on the high end and $1500 on the
> low end,
> and the result in either case would be a very competitive plane.
>
> The point of my message was that I can be on a competitive playing
> field in
> Pattern in this dollar range, but in IMAC the price tag is more like
> $7000
> and continually growing as pilots go from 33%, to 40%, to 50%
> planes. It
> would be very discouraging to me to have to compete against someone
> that
> drops this much money on am IMAC plane, but if someone drops $3000
> or $4000
> on a pattern plane I know it's probably just because they didn't
> want to
> build :-)
>
> Keith Black
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "GeorgeF." <av8tor at flash.net>
> To: <discussion at nsrca.org>
> Sent: Monday, November 11, 2002 6:06 PM
> Subject: Re: Weight Limit
>
>
> >
> > > In IMAC they're continually building them bigger and bigger,
> and one
> has
> > > to follow suite to be competitive.
> >
> > This "bigger and bigger" as resulted in many flying fields being
> > lost. Both because of "big" planes being flown wrecklessly and
> because of
> > noise.
> >
> > >
> > >I know that changes often have unintended consequences. The
> question is
> > >will lifting the weight limitation cause an explosion in price or
> simply
> > >provide more economical and technically appealing options as
> others have
> > >suggested.
> >
> >
> > For an answer to this lets take a look at what happened with the
> engine
> > size rule was lifted. What happened to cost? What happened to
> average
> > aircraft size? Both went up.
> >
> > BTW you mentioned being competitive with a $1500 plane. If true
> why are
> > the "top boys" flying planes were the radio/receiver/servos along
> cost
> $1500?
> >
> > George
> >
> >
> > =====================================
> > # To be removed from this list, send a message to
> > # discussion-request at nsrca.org
> > # and put leave discussion on the first line of the body.
> > #
> >
>
> =====================================
> # To be removed from this list, send a message to
> # discussion-request at nsrca.org
> # and put leave discussion on the first line of the body.
> #
>
>
>
=====================================
# To be removed from this list, send a message to
# discussion-request at nsrca.org
# and put leave discussion on the first line of the body.
#
More information about the NSRCA-discussion
mailing list