K-Factor Status

Thomas C. Weedon weedon at wwnet.net
Mon Nov 4 02:00:50 AKST 2002


Bill,
The new publisher has the ability to post the K-Factor on the web site
immediately after he finishes the lay out.
You should see an improvement.
Tom
  -----Original Message-----
  From: discussion-request at nsrca.org [mailto:discussion-request at nsrca.org]On
Behalf Of Bill Glaze
  Sent: Sunday, November 03, 2002 10:06 AM
  To: discussion at nsrca.org
  Subject: Re: K-Factor Status


  Tom:
  Will the K-Factor be posted on the web site in a timely manner for those
of us who prefer electronic transfer of information?  I surely hope so!
  Thanks
  Bill Glaze
  "Thomas C. Weedon" wrote:

     Wade,You have heard right. We now have a "Professional" publisher. He
will cost us a little more, but he says he can save us money in the long
run, because of his expertise in the business. He has the next issue of the
K-Factor almost complete and plans to mail it by next week end. In the
meantime, Brian has gotten his last issue in the mail and all of you should
be receiving it soon.Back to the dues issue. There are two ways to keep the
dues within reason; one - cut costs and over head, or two - cut services.
Almost all of the workers and officers recieve no compensation for their
efforts, therefore we can't cut there. However, the next time you see the
annual printed budget, examine it closely.Tom W.
      -----Original Message-----
      From: discussion-request at nsrca.org
[mailto:discussion-request at nsrca.org]On Behalf Of Wade & Barbara Akle
      Sent: Saturday, November 02, 2002 9:03 AM
      To: Discussion rc NSRCA
      Subject: K-Factor Status

      I had a couple of email communications off-line re the K status. Did I
remember correctly that a couple of weeks ago it was going to a professional
house for printing and distribution, long term? Should we expect it
soon?Wade

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.f3a.us/pipermail/nsrca-discussion/attachments/20021104/ee9b9d54/attachment.html


More information about the NSRCA-discussion mailing list