Involving the pattern community as a whole.

[Del Rykert]

Concur.
        Del
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Martin X. Moleski, SJ" <moleski at canisius.edu>
To: <discussion at nsrca.org>
Sent: Wednesday, December 11, 2002 10:26 AM
Subject: RE: Involving the pattern community as a whole.


| > This is the kind of concept I was advocating several months ago. Then
| > I got replies on this list from NSRCA officers that stated "non-member
| > are not invited". Non-members stay out, we know what is best for
| > pattern. PERIOD!
| 
| I don't mind a free database of interested AMA members.
| 
| I don't mind letting AMA members comment on rules changes.
| 
| I do mind allowing non-members to have equal voting
| rights with members when considering NSRCA policy
| decisions.
| 
| I don't think this is the equivalent of saying "we alone
| know what is best for pattern."  It is a way of saying
| that members get to vote on NSRCA policies and non-members
| do not.  That is consistent with Robert's Rules of Order
| and other democratic traditions.
| 
| Marty #2874 (not yet renewed)
| =====================================
| # To be removed from this list, send a message to 
| # discussion-request at nsrca.org
| # and put leave discussion on the first line of the body.
| #
| 

=====================================
# To be removed from this list, send a message to 
# discussion-request at nsrca.org
# and put leave discussion on the first line of the body.
#