Annex

[Kurt Koelling]

FYI: Here is a list of the eleven AMA Aerobatics Contest Board 
Members.  Four out of eleven are NSRCA members and six out of eleven are 
IMAC members.  Only one is a member of both NSRCA and IMAC.  Surprisingly, 
two are not members of either SIG!

I Scott Melville (member of NSRCA)
II Ron Lockhart (member of IMAC)
III Geoff Combs
IV Tom Miller (member of IMAC)
V John Fuqua (member of NSRCA)
VI Charles Reed  (member of IMAC)
VII David von Linsowe (member of IMAC)
VIII William Thomas (member of NSRCA)
IX Jim Mowrey
X Derek Koopowitz (member of NSRCA and IMAC)
XI Rick Allison (member of IMAC)

I am pretty sure that a majority (six or more) of these eleven people were 
members of the NSRCA at one time but may not currently be a member of the 
NSRCA.
Kurt Koelling

At 10:28 AM 12/14/02 -0500, you wrote:
>Bill: It's worse than that! Dave did not say majority, he said "Contest
>Board members are almost entirely, NSRCA members."
>Now, 4 is almost entirely all, of 11!
>
>Terry T.
>
>
>
>n Sat, 14 Dec 2002 09:56:07 -0600 Bill Glaze <billglaze at triad.rr.com>
>writes:
> > Interesting.  4 constitutes a majority out of a total of 11?  Perhaps
> > I should have
> > paid more attention in Political Science or my Math classes.
> > Bill Glaze
> >
> > Ron Van Putte wrote:
> >
> > > Bill Glaze wrote:
> > >
> > > > Maybe I'm confused, but the effort by Ron has nothing to do with
> > circumventing
> > > > the survey, or by making more than 3 year sequence changes.
> > > > What it does have to do with, is the ability of the NSRCA to
> > control those
> > > > things that appertain to pattern, including sequences, and not
> > having an AMA
> > > > board (most of whom are not pattern folks) making decisions
> > about what pattern
> > > > is going to fly.
> > >
> > > For those who may be interested, according to the NSRCA database,
> > the
> > > following R/C Aerobatics contest board members are members of
> > NSRCA:
> > > Scott Melville, Fohn Fuqua, Derek Koopowitz and William Thomas.
> > That's
> > > four out of an eleven member board.
> > >
> > > Here's what Dave Brown said in an e-mail to the discussion list
> > yesterday:
> > >
> > > "I am surprised that you have chosen to not pursue the
> > alternative
> > > concept of putting the schedules into an annex, which is subject
> > to the
> > > approval of the CB, as I think this would accomplish your goals,
> > without
> > > incuring the problems which triggered the rejection by the Exec
> > Council.
> > >
> > > "I believe the EC would support this approach (by not even
> > addressing
> > > it), and it would accomplish your goals. Please keep in mind that
> > the
> > > Contest Board members are almost entirely, NSRCA members."
> > >
> > > Makes you wonder about the accuracy of items included in the
> > message
> > > sent to the Executive Council, asking them to vote on rejecting
> > the
> > > annex proposal I submitted.
> > >
> > > Ron Van Putte
> > >
> > > =====================================
> > > # To be removed from this list, send a message to
> > > # discussion-request at nsrca.org
> > > # and put leave discussion on the first line of the body.
> > > #
> >
> > =====================================
> > # To be removed from this list, send a message to
> > # discussion-request at nsrca.org
> > # and put leave discussion on the first line of the body.
> > #
> >
> >
> >
>=====================================
># To be removed from this list, send a message to
># discussion-request at nsrca.org
># and put leave discussion on the first line of the body.
>#

=====================================
# To be removed from this list, send a message to 
# discussion-request at nsrca.org
# and put leave discussion on the first line of the body.
#