Annex

[Terry Terrenoire]

Bill: It's worse than that! Dave did not say majority, he said "Contest
Board members are almost entirely, NSRCA members."
Now, 4 is almost entirely all, of 11!

Terry T.



n Sat, 14 Dec 2002 09:56:07 -0600 Bill Glaze <billglaze at triad.rr.com>
writes:
> Interesting.  4 constitutes a majority out of a total of 11?  Perhaps 
> I should have
> paid more attention in Political Science or my Math classes.
> Bill Glaze
> 
> Ron Van Putte wrote:
> 
> > Bill Glaze wrote:
> >
> > > Maybe I'm confused, but the effort by Ron has nothing to do with 
> circumventing
> > > the survey, or by making more than 3 year sequence changes.
> > > What it does have to do with, is the ability of the NSRCA to 
> control those
> > > things that appertain to pattern, including sequences, and not 
> having an AMA
> > > board (most of whom are not pattern folks) making decisions 
> about what pattern
> > > is going to fly.
> >
> > For those who may be interested, according to the NSRCA database, 
> the
> > following R/C Aerobatics contest board members are members of 
> NSRCA:
> > Scott Melville, Fohn Fuqua, Derek Koopowitz and William Thomas.  
> That's
> > four out of an eleven member board.
> >
> > Here's what Dave Brown said in an e-mail to the discussion list 
> yesterday:
> >
> > "I am surprised that you have chosen to not pursue the 
> alternative
> > concept of putting the schedules into an annex, which is subject 
> to the
> > approval of the CB, as I think this would accomplish your goals, 
> without
> > incuring the problems which triggered the rejection by the Exec 
> Council.
> >
> > "I believe the EC would support this approach (by not even 
> addressing
> > it), and it would accomplish your goals. Please keep in mind that 
> the
> > Contest Board members are almost entirely, NSRCA members."
> >
> > Makes you wonder about the accuracy of items included in the 
> message
> > sent to the Executive Council, asking them to vote on rejecting 
> the
> > annex proposal I submitted.
> >
> > Ron Van Putte
> >
> > =====================================
> > # To be removed from this list, send a message to
> > # discussion-request at nsrca.org
> > # and put leave discussion on the first line of the body.
> > #
> 
> =====================================
> # To be removed from this list, send a message to 
> # discussion-request at nsrca.org
> # and put leave discussion on the first line of the body.
> #
> 
> 
> 
=====================================
# To be removed from this list, send a message to 
# discussion-request at nsrca.org
# and put leave discussion on the first line of the body.
#