Annex

[Ron Van Putte]

Bill Glaze wrote:

> Maybe I'm confused, but the effort by Ron has nothing to do with circumventing
> the survey, or by making more than 3 year sequence changes.
> What it does have to do with, is the ability of the NSRCA to control those
> things that appertain to pattern, including sequences, and not having an AMA
> board (most of whom are not pattern folks) making decisions about what pattern
> is going to fly.


For those who may be interested, according to the NSRCA database, the 
following R/C Aerobatics contest board members are members of NSRCA: 
Scott Melville, Fohn Fuqua, Derek Koopowitz and William Thomas.  That's 
four out of an eleven member board.

Here's what Dave Brown said in an e-mail to the discussion list yesterday:

"I am surprised that you have chosen to not pursue the alternative 
concept of putting the schedules into an annex, which is subject to the 
approval of the CB, as I think this would accomplish your goals, without 
incuring the problems which triggered the rejection by the Exec Council.

"I believe the EC would support this approach (by not even addressing 
it), and it would accomplish your goals. Please keep in mind that the 
Contest Board members are almost entirely, NSRCA members."

Makes you wonder about the accuracy of items included in the message 
sent to the Executive Council, asking them to vote on rejecting the 
annex proposal I submitted.

Ron Van Putte

=====================================
# To be removed from this list, send a message to 
# discussion-request at nsrca.org
# and put leave discussion on the first line of the body.
#