Involving the pattern community as a whole.

[Terry Terrenoire]

Boy, have you opened yourself up for criticism.................from the
NASCAR crew! Maybe even from Bill Elliot who flys R/C choppers and big
scale stuff. LUCK you say? I'll admit that there is a certain amount of
luck in ANY form of racing. On the other hand, I'll readily admit to the
difference in sophistication between F1 and NASCAR, but will not conceed
to the skills required by either the drivers or crew members between the
two. At lestin NASCAR, even if you start at the back of the pack, you
have a chance of winning. At this year's Indy race it was announced that
noone had won the race starting back beyond 8th place for over 50 years.
Now, which is more competitive?

TErry T.

On Fri, 13 Dec 2002 09:11:31 -0600 "Zapata, Lisandro A."
<LAZapata at pbsj.com> writes:
> Hummmm,
> NASCAR: a bunch of guys racing around with stock cars and the winner 
> is
> determinate by luck!!
> F1: state of the art machines racing by brand of engines, tires, 
> chassis &
> design on different tracks and almost never had a pace car in front 
> and the
> winner is determinate by skills.
> Nope, it's not like that!!!
> Both race cars but one race real racing machines the other identical 
> cars
> with different bodies.
> 
> But.. IMAC and NSRCA can be merge to form the AAA (Association of 
> Aerobatic
> Airplanes) with two sub-divisions: Precision and scale... nuh, 
> sounds too
> .... Keep it like it is.
> 
> Regards, Arturo Z.
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Wes [mailto:wesslack at pacbell.net]
> Sent: Friday, December 13, 2002 12:27 AM
> To: discussion at nsrca.org
> Subject: Re: Involving the pattern community as a whole.
> 
> 
> That's like saying NASCAR and Formula One should be merged...both 
> are
> driving
> races with race cars.
> 
> Regards, &c...Wes
> 
> 
> Ann & Dave Burton wrote:
> 
> > So, What's the big difference?
> > Both are flying aerobatics with aerobatic airplanes.
> >
> > "GeorgeF." wrote:
> >
> > > At 03:14 PM 12/11/2002 -0500, you wrote:
> > > >Troy,
> > > >I think your dead on.
> > > >I would like to see the two organizations merged into one, 
> Neither is
> > > >large enough or strong enough to have much clout. Together, 
> there would
> > > >be a much better organization in place to promote our common 
> interest.
> > >
> > > If you merger IMAC and NSRCA together I'm sure you're going to 
> loose a
> lot
> > > of current NSRCA members.   The two disciplines are very 
> different.
> > >
> > > Bad move....
> > > George
> > > NSRCA 1046 (not yet renewed)
> > >
> > > =====================================
> > > # To be removed from this list, send a message to
> > > # discussion-request at nsrca.org
> > > # and put leave discussion on the first line of the body.
> > > #
> >
> > --
> > -----------------------------------------------------
> > Click here for Free Video!!
> > http://www.gohip.com/free_video/
> >
> > =====================================
> > # To be removed from this list, send a message to
> > # discussion-request at nsrca.org
> > # and put leave discussion on the first line of the body.
> > #
> 
> =====================================
> # To be removed from this list, send a message to 
> # discussion-request at nsrca.org
> # and put leave discussion on the first line of the body.
> #
> =====================================
> # To be removed from this list, send a message to 
> # discussion-request at nsrca.org
> # and put leave discussion on the first line of the body.
> #
> 
> 
> 
=====================================
# To be removed from this list, send a message to 
# discussion-request at nsrca.org
# and put leave discussion on the first line of the body.
#