Involving the pattern community as a whole.

[Ron Van Putte]

BUDDYonRC at aol.com wrote:

> Not a bad idea.
> What if the NSRCA became the Precision Aerobatics Division of IMAC then 
> we could use their annex system.
> Honestly if you make the effort to go to their site and investigate what 
> the IMAC group has put together you will find a well thought out and 
> planned system that implements what we are trying to do. We are not 
> there yet and it will take many hours of R&D to get to where they are 
> today. Hat's off to those In IMAC who put it all together they did a 
> good job. and obviously AMA thought so to.


However, If you look at the actual rules pertaining to the IMAC 
maneuver/schedule change process, you will find that it is LESS DETAILED 
than what I wrote for the annex proposal.  Hmmmmm.  I find that very 
interesting.

Ron Van Putte

=====================================
# To be removed from this list, send a message to 
# discussion-request at nsrca.org
# and put leave discussion on the first line of the body.
#