Annex

[Ron Van Putte]

Larry Ott wrote:
> See below for questions.
> 
> 
>>Subject: Re: Annex
>>
>>
>>The AMA president said that the annex proposal had to be 
>>withdrawn prior to official completion of the AMA Executive
>>Council vote or the proposal was 'dead' until the next rule
>>change cycle.  The EC vote was completed at noon yesterday. 
> 
> 
> 1. What was the result of the vote?

I don't know the result of the vote.  On Friday I was informed that, for 
the votes already received, it was unanimous for rejection of the proposal.

> 2. Have you been informed by Steve Kaluf as to what authority the
>    EC had to intervene?

Steve Kaluf cited ARTICLE XII Competition Jurisdiction Section 6. "The 
Executive Council shall retain power over Contest Board actions and 
procedures which may create unforeseen legal or conflicting policy 
questions for the AMA."

Hmmm.  It seems that IMAC and NSRCA have 'conflicting policy questions'.

> 3. Also, under what authority does Dave Brown have to state that
>    the proposal is "dead" until the next rules cycle?

He didn't cite Dave Brown's authority to make that statement.  He did 
say, "You should also note the voting was completed at noon yesterday. 
Any further provisions for alternate proposals will have to be 
coordinated with Dave Brown as it seems he gave you a hard cut off with 
the end of the voting."

Ron Van Putte









Ron Van Putte

=====================================
# To be removed from this list, send a message to 
# discussion-request at nsrca.org
# and put leave discussion on the first line of the body.
#