Fw: NSRCA rules proposals

[Emory Schroeter]

The following is what I sent to the Executive counsel members. Please feel free to copy their email addresses and let them know how you like their decisions.

Emory Schroeter.
----- Original Message ----- 
From: Emory Schroeter 
To: dbrown at dbproducts.com 
Cc: cdh323 at aol.com ; dmathewson at mindspring.com ; amadiii at penn.com ; blissteague at conninc.com ; ama at scott.net ; bauerc at iit.edu ; sgaeroinc at comcast.net ; sfrank69 at airmail.net ; rumiller at daktel.com ; richh at bigplanet.com ; nelsonamavp at cs.com 
Sent: Monday, December 09, 2002 11:24 AM
Subject: NSRCA rules proposals


Dear Mr. Brown and other EC members:

I am writing this email in support of the recent rule change proposals that you have received from the NSRCA. I understand that Mr. Brown is recommending that the proposal for us to annex our flight schedules be rejected without being sent to the contest board. I find that to be a big slap in the face to the NSRCA members. My biggest question is why that should be fine for one SIG and not another? Is IMAC somehow better able to determine what schedules they will fly? Please respond and let me know why you feel this is such a bad idea. To my knowledge, I haven't heard of any problems with IMAC's flight schedules.
I do not, as of yet, know the rational behind your decisions, however, my perception is that the AMA just doesn't want to give up the control it has.

Sincerely,
Emory Schroeter
AMA# 446434
NSRCA# 1804
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.f3a.us/pipermail/nsrca-discussion/attachments/20021209/93eab3a4/attachment.html