Annex Proposal

[ANDY HERIDER]

Matt,

I don't think insurance would be an issue because we are all indivually cover by the AMA as long as we pay our AMA dues. It would make a difference if we were insured as a group under the AMA. 

P.S. Ron Loch, did you get my reply to your message? I sent one to you and the discussion list(I thought). I usually get a copy of my own message but I didn't this time.

Andy Herider
AMA 70491
NSRCA 2212


-----Original Message-----
Date: Sun 12/08/02  8:28 PM
From: Rcmaster199 at aol.com <discussion at nsrca.org>
To:  discussion at nsrca.org
CC: 
Subject: Re: Annex Proposal

In a message dated 12/8/2002 7:58:03 PM Eastern Standard Time, 
vanputte at nuc.net writes:


> Subj:Re: Annex Proposal 
> Date:12/8/2002 7:58:03 PM Eastern Standard Time
> From:<A HREF="mailto:vanputte at nuc.net">vanputte at nuc.net</A>
> Reply-to:<A HREF="mailto:discussion at nsrca.org">discussion at nsrca.org</A>
> To:<A HREF="mailto:discussion at nsrca.org">discussion at nsrca.org</A>
> Sent from the Internet 
> 
> 
> 
> ANDY HERIDER wrote:
> 
> >I want to let you know about another SIG that had trouble with the AMA. 
> The LSF (League of Silent Flight) a few years back had a riff with the AMA. 
> The AMA didn't want to listen to the LSF on some of their proposals. The 
> LSF then retaliated against the AMA by holding their own nationals at a 
> different location non affiliated with the AMA. The AMA then realized if 
> they didn't let the LSF make some of their own decisions that they weren't 
> going to have a AMA soaring nationals. The bottom line is the AMA wants and 
> needs the revenue generated by the SIG's. If your going to allow one SIG to 
> compile their own rules, maneuvers, etc. then all of the SIG's should enjoy 
> the same freedom. We all contribute equally so we should all benefit 
> equally. I think we have a real good and just arguement. I think that we 
> need to talk to some of the other SIG's and see exactly how things were 
> done when they were up against the wall like we are.
> 
> We (NSRCA) did this a few years back as well.  When we wanted more 
> control over the NATS, the AMA blew us off, so we sponsored the NSRCA 
> Pan American Championships (NPAC), first at Lawrenceville, IL and again 
> at Tullahoma, TN.  After that, AMA caved and we ran our part of the 
> Nats.  I'm not suggesting that we do another NPAC, but maybe it's time 
> to remind them that we are willing and capable of doing something like 
> NPAC if we feel that our needs aren't being met by the national 
> organization.
> 
> Ron Van Putte
> 

Hi Ron,

I am with you on this issue. We, the Pattern afficionados, indeed set the 
precedent in the early 90's with the two NPAC contests, sponsored, managed 
and conducted by the NSRCA. I would be in favor of doing it again if AMA 
Board members don't see the value of NSRCA's collective judgement in regards 
to OUR DISCIPLINE. (CAPS ARE YELLING!)

We just need to be ready for any insurance issues that may surface. Based on 
the NSRCA Dues Cost discussions of the past, I don't think we, the NSRCA, are 
ready to self insure 

Matt




--
This message was sent using 3wmail.
Your fast free POP3 mail client at www.3wmail.com
=====================================
# To be removed from this list, send a message to 
# discussion-request at nsrca.org
# and put leave discussion on the first line of the body.
#