Annex Proposal
Ron Van Putte
vanputte at nuc.net
Sun Dec 8 08:30:03 AKST 2002
Buddy Brammer wrote:
>
> You are likely correct reguarding the best intrest of AMA reason, but I
> would think they should at least quote the chapter and verse of their
> authority to do so.In any event you have a good point and reason to
> offer a revised proposal. It sure looks like a railroad job when the
> proposal was submitted in october and they are just now making us aware
> of this.
I am leaning further to waiting until the AMA Executive Council refuses
to allow the contest board to see the annex proposal. I do not know in
what way I will receive official notification of the council vote. When
I receive the notification, I can ask on what authority the council
acted in the way they did. BTW, I believe that it takes AMA at least 60
days to do ANYTHING.
Ron Van Putte
=====================================
# To be removed from this list, send a message to
# discussion-request at nsrca.org
# and put leave discussion on the first line of the body.
#
More information about the NSRCA-discussion
mailing list