Annex Proposal

[GeorgeF.]

At 06:56 PM 12/7/2002 -0600, you wrote:

>Ron
>
>Are they also going to regain control of IMAC by setting the same and 
>equal rules reguarding sequences for them in the future? If not there seem 
>to be some lack of consideration on their part to repersent all SIG's 
>equally. Could be that they are trying to justify their existance. which 
>could start an internal controversy in spite of what we as a SIG"s have 
>deturmined is best for us, After all the AMA board dosen't fly IMAC or 
>Pattern,  they only control the rules and may have deturmined that they 
>are loosing control. Which in my view is a sign of weakness not strength. 
>Good leaders lead. I will be waiting to hear the outcome of this and the 
>reasons for their decission and sincerely hope that they make the right one.
>
>Buddy


Does IMAC have any contests at the NATS?  If I remember correctly they 
don't (but I could be wrong).  If the AMA Nats doesn't have any IMAC events 
then I could see whey the AMA doesn't care to keep tighter control of what 
IMAC does.

However Pattern is a represented event at the AMA's NATS therefore the AMA 
wants to have the final say in all rules governing pattern flying included 
the sequences being flown.

I might be wrong but it was just a thought I had.....

George


=====================================
# To be removed from this list, send a message to 
# discussion-request at nsrca.org
# and put leave discussion on the first line of the body.
#