[NSRCA-dist8] Classic Pattern

alan wellentin a_wellentin at yahoo.com
Wed Feb 19 14:54:48 AKST 2014


It looks to me like there are two different things going on here.  There's a run what you brung which would essentially mean pretty much anything 60 size and smaller would compete.  Then there's the "classic pattern".  Honestly, I'm not planning on putting another plane in the air, it's going to be tough enough to keep myself flying and get Nicole flying if she gets motivated, so to me it doesn't really matter, but, I'm afraid if your going to say pretty much anything goes, then, anything needs to go.  If your going to say classic pattern, then, classic pattern it is.

Alan



On Wednesday, February 19, 2014 3:41 PM, Patrick Harris <harris7148 at gmail.com> wrote:
  
Bob,

Under the laid out guide line, I would say Yes it would be OK, but the intent is to keep it to Old School. To me a 3D ARF of modern design does not fit the "Old School" criteria. This stuff isn't in stone so we can still adjust as we go. Any thoughts from everyone on how to write this is most appreciated. Like Jim, said we don't want to alienate anyone, but we do need some sort of guideline. 

Pat




On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 2:09 PM, Gail & Robert Walker <grbwii at comcast.net> wrote:

 
>Pat, 
>  Just checking, but would that mean that I 
could use my electric Katanna(SP)? You say it fly at Dusters the other day. I 
would have to tone the throws down a bit, but it seems to fit your 
specs? 
>              
Bob W 
>                   
>----- Original Message -----  
>>From: Patrick  Harris  
>>To: Ray Gauthier  
>>Cc: AK, ID, MT, OR, WA, WY ; Brad  Burden ; Bob  Walker ; Rudy ; Rick Bergeron ; alan  wellentin ; Arthur F. Kelly ; Bill Carder ; Gary McClellan  
>>Sent: Wednesday, February 19, 2014 12:21  PM 
>>Subject: Re: Classic Pattern 
>>
>> 
>>Very cool 
>>
>> 
>>
>>
>>
>>On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 12:19 PM, Raymond C. Gauthier <rc.gauthier at comcast.net> wrote:
>>
>>A  pic of the Dalotel is attached.  Pretty cool  eh? 
>>>__________________________________________ 
>>>  
>>>I’m  hoping I have something old hanging in the garage that would fill the  bill.  I know I have a scale French aerobatic airplane, a Dalotel,  which is the right size and pretty much in flyable (wet power)  condition.  When I’m back in town I’ll have to dig it out and see how  it flies the Novice pattern. 
>>>  
>>>Ray 
>>>  
>>>  
>>>  
>>>From:Patrick Harris  [mailto:harris7148 at gmail.com] 
>>> 
>>>Sent: Wednesday, February 19, 2014 12:53 PM
>>>To: Ray  Gauthier
>>>Cc: AK, ID, MT, OR, WA, WY; Brad Burden; Bob  Walker; Rudy; Rick Bergeron; alan wellentin; Arthur F. Kelly; Bill Carder;  Gary McClellan
>>>Subject: Re: Classic Pattern 
>>>  
>>>Ray, 
>>>  
>>>Yes. By saying 60 size that pretty much limits you to pre  80's planes. Are we going to turn away a guy that walks up with a little  Osiris? The way it's written, no we wouldn't turn him away, but I think this  is going to be a non issue or infrequent if at all. . We need to keep this  real simple and have fun. 
>>>  
>>>  
>>>  
>>>On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 10:53 AM, Raymond C. Gauthier  <rc.gauthier at comcast.net> wrote: 
>>>Does  no year restrictions mean any airplane that fits the size and power  guidelines? 
>>>  
>>>From:Patrick Harris  [mailto:harris7148 at gmail.com] 
>>>Sent: Wednesday, February  19, 2014 11:47 AM
>>>To: AK, ID, MT, OR, WA, WY; Brad Burden; Bob  Walker; Ray Gauthier; Rudy; Rick Bergeron; alan wellentin; Arthur F. Kelly;  Bill Carder; Gary McClellan
>>>Subject: Classic  Pattern 
>>>  
>>>Just a quick update. I have had a few question from a  couple of CD's in regards to Classic pattern this year. The bottom line is  we do this is to have fun and we don't want to load this up with a bunch of  rules.  
>>>  
>>>Long story short, here are the only criteria. Keep in  mind we will likely tweak this as we go: 
>>>  
>>>No year restrictions 
>>>  
>>>60 class planes or smaller 
>>>  
>>>6 cell maximum for electrics 
>>>  
>>>That's it. We will fly two schedules this year which are  Novice and Advanced which can be found here; 
>>>  
>>>http://www.classicpatternassociation.com/uploads/CPA_call_card.pdf 
>>>  
>>>At some of our contest we will fly classic Saturday and  Sunday in the mornings due to sun issues (Woodburn, Redmond). At fields like  Molalla that we can fly turnaround by 8:00, we will fly classic on Saturday  after turnaround and it's the discretion of the CD to fly classic on Sunday.  My guess is for those fields we will fly classic on Saturday only to get  guys on the road Sunday.   
>>>  
>>>Also, Gordon has been at it again with a great new  feature on the D8 site. No longer will you have to search in vane for  upcoming events to preregister on the NSRCA calendar. All you will need to  do is click on the 2014 schedule on the D8 site and you will find an info  link and a link to the calendar for preregistration. By the way, it is a  great help to the CD"s and Gordon to preregister to all contest you plan to  attend. Again, my thanks to Gordon. Without him, we wouldn't be where we  are.   
>>>  
>>>If you have questions or concerns, email or give me a  call. 
>>>  
>>>503-454-0381 
>>>  
>>>Pat 
>>>  
>>> 
>> 
>
>
>
>________________________________
> 
>   This email is free from viruses and malware because avast! Antivirus protection is active.    
> 
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.nsrca.org/pipermail/nsrca-dist8/attachments/20140219/6386e001/attachment.html>


More information about the NSRCA-dist8 mailing list