<html><head></head><body><div style="color:#000; background-color:#fff; font-family:HelveticaNeue, Helvetica Neue, Helvetica, Arial, Lucida Grande, sans-serif;font-size:13px"><div id="yui_3_16_0_ym19_1_1462203311154_8913">You guys are missing the entire point, and replacing it with misplaced feelings of "fairness".</div><div id="yui_3_16_0_ym19_1_1462203311154_8889"><br></div><div id="yui_3_16_0_ym19_1_1462203311154_8890">A club is a sovereign entity, which can direct it's affairs as it sees fit. For an outside entity which has no authority over that club to impose a penalty upon that club is unjust.</div><div id="yui_3_16_0_ym19_1_1462203311154_8977"><br></div><div id="yui_3_16_0_ym19_1_1462203311154_8978">And if you support this action, you too are unjust.</div><div id="yui_3_16_0_ym19_1_1462203311154_9235"><br></div><div dir="ltr" id="yui_3_16_0_ym19_1_1462203311154_9050">I would not nor will I ever support discriminating against any individual for any reason of personal vendetta or to sow hatred. <b>That would be an abomination</b>! But that is not what is occurring here. The discrimination comes in the form of unjustified prejudice against a sovereign organization that made a decision that is unpopular to some (outside) people. It was not a matter that was taken lightly. There was no violation of the law, nor any organization to which they are subject to terms or policy (AMA). They had to do what they determined was right for them, and that is none of any one else's business. And THAT is the point.<br></div><div id="yui_3_16_0_ym19_1_1462203311154_9262" dir="ltr"><br></div><div id="yui_3_16_0_ym19_1_1462203311154_9401" dir="ltr">I will leave you with this; If the shoe were on the other foot, and it was your club........................................................</div><div id="yui_3_16_0_ym19_1_1462203311154_9402" dir="ltr"><br></div><div id="yui_3_16_0_ym19_1_1462203311154_9403" dir="ltr">Respectfully,<br></div><div id="yui_3_16_0_ym19_1_1462203311154_9454" dir="ltr">Robert Fish<br></div><div id="yui_3_16_0_ym19_1_1462203311154_8825"><span></span></div><div id="yui_3_16_0_ym19_1_1462203311154_8830" class="qtdSeparateBR"><br><br></div><div style="display: block;" id="yui_3_16_0_ym19_1_1462203311154_9449" class="yahoo_quoted"> <div id="yui_3_16_0_ym19_1_1462203311154_9448" style="font-family: HelveticaNeue, Helvetica Neue, Helvetica, Arial, Lucida Grande, sans-serif; font-size: 13px;"> <div id="yui_3_16_0_ym19_1_1462203311154_9447" style="font-family: HelveticaNeue, Helvetica Neue, Helvetica, Arial, Lucida Grande, sans-serif; font-size: 16px;"> <div id="yui_3_16_0_ym19_1_1462203311154_9446" dir="ltr"> <font id="yui_3_16_0_ym19_1_1462203311154_9450" face="Arial" size="2"> <hr id="yui_3_16_0_ym19_1_1462203311154_9453" size="1"> <b id="yui_3_16_0_ym19_1_1462203311154_9452"><span id="yui_3_16_0_ym19_1_1462203311154_9451" style="font-weight:bold;">From:</span></b> joncarter60 via NSRCA-dist7 <nsrca-dist7@lists.nsrca.org><br> <b><span style="font-weight: bold;">To:</span></b> Budd Engineering <jerry@buddengineering.com>; "CA, AZ, HI, NV, UT" <nsrca-dist7@lists.nsrca.org>; Olstinske Dale <sanjosedale@gmail.com> <br> <b><span style="font-weight: bold;">Sent:</span></b> Monday, May 2, 2016 8:24 AM<br> <b><span style="font-weight: bold;">Subject:</span></b> Re: [NSRCA-dist7] Championship Points and Methods<br> </font> </div> <div id="yui_3_16_0_ym19_1_1462203311154_9482" class="y_msg_container"><br><div id="yiv6920359504"><div id="yui_3_16_0_ym19_1_1462203311154_9484"><div id="yui_3_16_0_ym19_1_1462203311154_9483">I also am in agreement with Dale's points. It is simply about having a "level playing field" for the district championship.</div><div id="yui_3_16_0_ym19_1_1462203311154_9508"><br></div><div id="yui_3_16_0_ym19_1_1462203311154_9485">Jon Carter</div><div id="yui_3_16_0_ym19_1_1462203311154_9486"><br></div><div id="yui_3_16_0_ym19_1_1462203311154_9487"><br></div><div id="yui_3_16_0_ym19_1_1462203311154_9488"><br></div><div id="yiv6920359504composer_signature"><div id="yui_3_16_0_ym19_1_1462203311154_9489" style="font-size:85%;color:#575757;">Sent via the Samsung Galaxy S® 6 edge, an AT&T 4G LTE smartphone</div></div><div id="yui_3_16_0_ym19_1_1462203311154_9491" style="font-size:100%;color:#000000;"><div id="yui_3_16_0_ym19_1_1462203311154_9490">-------- Original message --------</div><div id="yui_3_16_0_ym19_1_1462203311154_9651">From: Budd Engineering via NSRCA-dist7 <nsrca-dist7@lists.nsrca.org> </div><div id="yui_3_16_0_ym19_1_1462203311154_9652">Date: 5/2/2016 8:15 AM (GMT-08:00) </div><div id="yui_3_16_0_ym19_1_1462203311154_9653">To: Olstinske Dale <sanjosedale@gmail.com>, "CA, AZ, HI, NV, UT" <nsrca-dist7@lists.nsrca.org> </div><div id="yui_3_16_0_ym19_1_1462203311154_9654">Subject: Re: [NSRCA-dist7] Championship Points and Methods </div><div id="yui_3_16_0_ym19_1_1462203311154_9655"><br></div></div>+1<br><br>Sent from my iPhone<br><br>> On May 2, 2016, at 7:54 AM, Olstinske Dale via NSRCA-dist7 <nsrca-dist7@lists.nsrca.org> wrote:<br>> <br>> I love the BMF contests, one of the highlights of the year. I would always attend in any event, but I support John’s decision about district championship points. I really doubt the attendance would be hurt in anyway, just my opinion.<br>> <br>> Dale<br>> <br>> <br>> <br>> <br>>> On May 1, 2016, at 4:20 PM, John Bentley via NSRCA-dist7 <nsrca-dist7@lists.nsrca.org> wrote:<br>>> <br>>> This is NOT an attack on the Bear Mountain Club/Tony/Leon, (read my original<br>>> post) It is a statement of policy, in that every and ALL members of the<br>>> NSRCA and AMA should be able to compete in the district championships. Did<br>>> anyone actually read my proposal???? . There should for pilots with the<br>>> exception of legal actions due to NSRCA or AMA never be an exclusion to this <br>>> policy.<br>>> I have never said that anyone could not have a contest, however for that<br>>> contest to be valid there can be no exclusions of pilots that are in good<br>>> standing with AMA and NSRCA There will be NO more personal attacks nor more<br>>> personal vendettas. This is only about out district policy and nothing else.<br>>> John Bentley <br>>> <br>>> 30 Apr 2016 04:58:39 PM MST<br>>> From: John Bentley via NSRCA-dist7 <nsrca-dist7@lists.nsrca.org><br>>> To: <nsrca-dist7@lists.nsrca.org><br>>> Subject: [NSRCA-dist7] Championship Points and Methods<br>>> <br>>> All NSRCA D7 Members. It has come to my attention that members in good<br>>> standing with AMA and NSRCA are unable to fly at a contest site. Because of<br>>> this, from this point no district championship points will be assigned at<br>>> any<br>>> contest that excludes a member that is in good standing with AMA and NSRCA.<br>>> <br>>> Now on the discussion about the Championship. The overall consensus is that<br>>> there should be a single Championship and that Championship should move to<br>>> different sites within D7. In all fairness since 4 contests have been flown<br>>> there will be no change in how points are determined for the 2016 contest<br>>> season.<br>>> <br>>> I have heard lots of talk on how the points are awarded . Here is my thought<br>>> in how the contest(S) could be more competitive:<br>>> <br>>> 1. Use 3 contests for qualification. Each pilot will be awarded 33 points for<br>>> attendance plus 1 point for each person they beat in the contest.<br>>> One contest can be used from out of district however that contest can not<br>>> have<br>>> any points given that is larger than the largest D7 contest attended.As an<br>>> example if a pilot attended the NATS and beat 30 people but their largest<br>>> class in D7 was 18 they could only be awarded 18 points extra not 30. <br>>> 2. The championship Contest will count as 100 points plus 1 point for each<br>>> person beat.<br>>> <br>>> 3.The method for the calculation will be announced no later than Jan 1 2017<br>>> <br>>> <br>>> John<br>>> <br>>> _______________________________________________<br>>> NSRCA-dist7 mailing list<br>>> NSRCA-dist7@lists.nsrca.org<br>>> http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-dist7<br>>> <br>>> <br>>> <br>>> <br>>> _______________________________________________<br>>> NSRCA-dist7 mailing list<br>>> NSRCA-dist7@lists.nsrca.org<br>>> http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-dist7<br>> <br>> _______________________________________________<br>> NSRCA-dist7 mailing list<br>> NSRCA-dist7@lists.nsrca.org<br>> http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-dist7<br><br><br>_______________________________________________<br>NSRCA-dist7 mailing list<br>NSRCA-dist7@lists.nsrca.org<br>http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-dist7<br></div></div><br>_______________________________________________<br>NSRCA-dist7 mailing list<br><a ymailto="mailto:NSRCA-dist7@lists.nsrca.org" href="mailto:NSRCA-dist7@lists.nsrca.org">NSRCA-dist7@lists.nsrca.org</a><br><a href="http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-dist7" target="_blank">http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-dist7</a><br><br><br></div> </div> </div> </div></div></body></html>