[NSRCA-dist7] NSRCA-dist7 Digest, Vol 130, Issue 7

Fri Apr 30 17:26:41 AKDT 2021

*I'm not even in the NSRCA right now but my thought is whatever FAI is
doing match that.*

Bill Polits
bpolits at gmail.com

On Fri, Apr 30, 2021 at 12:48 PM <nsrca-dist7-request at lists.nsrca.org>
wrote:

> Send NSRCA-dist7 mailing list submissions to
>         nsrca-dist7 at lists.nsrca.org
>
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
>         http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-dist7
> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
>         nsrca-dist7-request at lists.nsrca.org
>
> You can reach the person managing the list at
>         nsrca-dist7-owner at lists.nsrca.org
>
> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> than "Re: Contents of NSRCA-dist7 digest..."
>
>
> Today's Topics:
>
>    1. 12s Packs Rules Proposals (Derek Koopowitz)
>    2. Re: 12s Packs Rules Proposals (Bill Wallace)
>    3. Re: 12s Packs Rules Proposals (Derek Koopowitz)
>    4. Re: 12s Packs Rules Proposals (Robert E Fish)
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Message: 1
> Date: Fri, 30 Apr 2021 07:30:28 -0700
> From: Derek Koopowitz <derekkoopowitz at gmail.com>
> To: <nsrca-dist7 at lists.nsrca.org>
> Subject: [NSRCA-dist7] 12s Packs Rules Proposals
> Message-ID: <47DCFC82-B94C-4648-9AB7-65C0726740D4 at gmail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
>
> Good morning everyone,
>
>
>
> There is a rules proposal that has been submitted to the contest board for
> approval that deals with 12s packs.? We are looking to have a vote soon on
> whether to approve or not approve this proposal.? You can find the proposal
> here on the AMA website - RCA22-02.
>
>
>
> Please send me your thoughts on whether you think we should adopt this
> proposal or not.
>
>
>
> Pros:
>
> Higher voltage packs with less mah are cheaper
>
> Less weight (in theory)
>
> Cooler motors and batteries (may last longer)
>
> More efficient power consumption
>
>
>
> Cons:
>
> Expensive to convert existing equipment to 12s
>
> Doesn?t align with FAI
>
> Market may not support a lot of motor options
>
>
>
> Best,
>
> -Derek
>
> -------------- next part --------------
> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> URL: <
> http://lists.nsrca.org/pipermail/nsrca-dist7/attachments/20210430/d0918795/attachment-0001.html
> >
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 2
> Date: Fri, 30 Apr 2021 08:51:55 -0700
> From: Bill Wallace <bill.wallace5547 at gmail.com>
> To: Derek Koopowitz <derekkoopowitz at gmail.com>, "CA, AZ, HI, NV, UT"
>         <nsrca-dist7 at lists.nsrca.org>
> Subject: Re: [NSRCA-dist7] 12s Packs Rules Proposals
> Message-ID: <5CA3B0F1-9544-4BF8-BD22-5A1CB390C483 at gmail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
>
> I would say go for it.  The pro?s make sense, and the con?s only apply if
> the rule makes changing mandatory - which it doesn?t.  So if you don?t want
> to switch, you don?t have to.  But if you want to try it, it would be nice
> to have the opportunity.
>
> Bill Wallace
> Cell: 951-385-2605
>
> Sent from my iPad
>
> > On Apr 30, 2021, at 7:30 AM, Derek Koopowitz via NSRCA-dist7 <
> nsrca-dist7 at lists.nsrca.org> wrote:
> >
> > ?
> > Good morning everyone,
> >
> > There is a rules proposal that has been submitted to the contest board
> for approval that deals with 12s packs.  We are looking to have a vote soon
> on whether to approve or not approve this proposal.  You can find the
> proposal here on the AMA website - RCA22-02.
> >
> > Please send me your thoughts on whether you think we should adopt this
> proposal or not.
> >
> > Pros:
> > Higher voltage packs with less mah are cheaper
> > Less weight (in theory)
> > Cooler motors and batteries (may last longer)
> > More efficient power consumption
> >
> > Cons:
> > Expensive to convert existing equipment to 12s
> > Doesn?t align with FAI
> > Market may not support a lot of motor options
> >
> > Best,
> > -Derek
> > _______________________________________________
> > NSRCA-dist7 mailing list
> > NSRCA-dist7 at lists.nsrca.org
> > http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-dist7
> -------------- next part --------------
> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> URL: <
> http://lists.nsrca.org/pipermail/nsrca-dist7/attachments/20210430/85f7ad29/attachment-0001.html
> >
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 3
> Date: Fri, 30 Apr 2021 09:02:18 -0700
> From: Derek Koopowitz <derekkoopowitz at gmail.com>
> To: Bill Wallace <bill.wallace5547 at gmail.com>
> Cc: "CA, AZ, HI, NV, UT" <nsrca-dist7 at lists.nsrca.org>
> Subject: Re: [NSRCA-dist7] 12s Packs Rules Proposals
> Message-ID: <5C08D48D-5A5F-4192-910A-A128988F8104 at gmail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
>
> Thanks Bill.
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
> > On Apr 30, 2021, at 8:51 AM, Bill Wallace <bill.wallace5547 at gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >
> > ?I would say go for it.  The pro?s make sense, and the con?s only apply
> if the rule makes changing mandatory - which it doesn?t.  So if you don?t
> want to switch, you don?t have to.  But if you want to try it, it would be
> nice to have the opportunity.
> >
> > Bill Wallace
> > Cell: 951-385-2605
> >
> > Sent from my iPad
> >
> >>> On Apr 30, 2021, at 7:30 AM, Derek Koopowitz via NSRCA-dist7 <
> nsrca-dist7 at lists.nsrca.org> wrote:
> >>>
> >> ?
> >> Good morning everyone,
> >>
> >> There is a rules proposal that has been submitted to the contest board
> for approval that deals with 12s packs.  We are looking to have a vote soon
> on whether to approve or not approve this proposal.  You can find the
> proposal here on the AMA website - RCA22-02.
> >>
> >> Please send me your thoughts on whether you think we should adopt this
> proposal or not.
> >>
> >> Pros:
> >> Higher voltage packs with less mah are cheaper
> >> Less weight (in theory)
> >> Cooler motors and batteries (may last longer)
> >> More efficient power consumption
> >>
> >> Cons:
> >> Expensive to convert existing equipment to 12s
> >> Doesn?t align with FAI
> >> Market may not support a lot of motor options
> >>
> >> Best,
> >> -Derek
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> NSRCA-dist7 mailing list
> >> NSRCA-dist7 at lists.nsrca.org
> >> http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-dist7
> -------------- next part --------------
> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> URL: <
> http://lists.nsrca.org/pipermail/nsrca-dist7/attachments/20210430/d35a024b/attachment-0001.html
> >
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 4
> Date: Fri, 30 Apr 2021 16:48:22 +0000 (UTC)
> From: Robert E Fish <akmotov at pacbell.net>
> To: "nsrca-dist7 at lists.nsrca.org" <nsrca-dist7 at lists.nsrca.org>,
>         Derek Koopowitz <derekkoopowitz at gmail.com>
> Subject: Re: [NSRCA-dist7] 12s Packs Rules Proposals
> Message-ID: <296150210.3066181.1619801302339 at mail.yahoo.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
>
>  Derek,
> I agree 100% with the proposal. It is time for pattern to catch up with
> the rest of the world. Far more pros than cons IMO.
> Best regards,Robert Fish
>
>     On Friday, April 30, 2021, 7:30:39 AM PDT, Derek Koopowitz via
> NSRCA-dist7 <nsrca-dist7 at lists.nsrca.org> wrote:
>
>
> Good morning everyone,
>
>  ?
>
> There is a rules proposal that has been submitted to the contest board for
> approval that deals with 12s packs.? We are looking to have a vote soon on
> whether to approve or not approve this proposal.? You can find the proposal
> here on the AMA website - RCA22-02.
>
>  ?
>
> Please send me your thoughts on whether you think we should adopt this
> proposal or not.
>
>  ?
>
> Pros:
>
> Higher voltage packs with less mah are cheaper
>
> Less weight (in theory)
>
> Cooler motors and batteries (may last longer)
>
> More efficient power consumption
>
>  ?
>
> Cons:
>
> Expensive to convert existing equipment to 12s
>
> Doesn?t align with FAI
>
> Market may not support a lot of motor options
>
>  ?
>
> Best,
>
> -Derek
>  _______________________________________________
> NSRCA-dist7 mailing list
> NSRCA-dist7 at lists.nsrca.org
> http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-dist7
>
> -------------- next part --------------
> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> URL: <
> http://lists.nsrca.org/pipermail/nsrca-dist7/attachments/20210430/6605d4e2/attachment.html
> >
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Subject: Digest Footer
>
> _______________________________________________
> NSRCA-dist7 mailing list
> NSRCA-dist7 at lists.nsrca.org
> http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-dist7
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> End of NSRCA-dist7 Digest, Vol 130, Issue 7
> *******************************************
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.nsrca.org/pipermail/nsrca-dist7/attachments/20210501/f06d1994/attachment.html>