[NSRCA-dist7] 12s Packs Rules Proposals

[Derek Koopowitz]

Thanks for the comments, Glen. 

Sent from my iPhone

> On Apr 30, 2021, at 11:23 AM, Glen Dean <glen.dean1122 at gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> 
> My concern is that historically more available power has lead to larger aircraft designs, increase in complexity, cost and subsequently reduced participation in pattern. This proposal is damaging to the lower classes and seems counter to increased participation. The power aircraft size issue will always be present and consideration of the long-term implications must be weighed. 
> 
>> On Fri, Apr 30, 2021, 7:30 AM Derek Koopowitz via NSRCA-dist7 <nsrca-dist7 at lists.nsrca.org> wrote:
>> Good morning everyone,
>> 
>>  
>> 
>> There is a rules proposal that has been submitted to the contest board for approval that deals with 12s packs.  We are looking to have a vote soon on whether to approve or not approve this proposal.  You can find the proposal here on the AMA website - RCA22-02.
>> 
>>  
>> 
>> Please send me your thoughts on whether you think we should adopt this proposal or not.
>> 
>>  
>> 
>> Pros:
>> 
>> Higher voltage packs with less mah are cheaper
>> 
>> Less weight (in theory)
>> 
>> Cooler motors and batteries (may last longer)
>> 
>> More efficient power consumption
>> 
>>  
>> 
>> Cons:
>> 
>> Expensive to convert existing equipment to 12s
>> 
>> Doesn’t align with FAI
>> 
>> Market may not support a lot of motor options
>> 
>>  
>> 
>> Best,
>> 
>> -Derek
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> NSRCA-dist7 mailing list
>> NSRCA-dist7 at lists.nsrca.org
>> http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-dist7
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.nsrca.org/pipermail/nsrca-dist7/attachments/20210430/858177cc/attachment.html>