[NSRCA-dist7] Rules proposals

[Robert Gillespie]

Derek,
 i agree with both Tony & Jon!
 
Bob G.

--- On Tue, 9/4/12, joncarter60 at comcast.net <joncarter60 at comcast.net> wrote:


From: joncarter60 at comcast.net <joncarter60 at comcast.net>
Subject: Re: [NSRCA-dist7] Rules proposals
To: "AZ CA, HI, NV, UT" <nsrca-dist7 at lists.nsrca.org>
Date: Tuesday, September 4, 2012, 8:38 AM



#yiv1991710957 p {margin:0;}


Derek - here are my thoughts.

13.2 NSRCA developed Advancement proposal - Yes

13.4 NSRCA developed Telemetry proposal - Yes

13.6 Lockhart Weight proposal - No, I think this attempt at a weight rule change is functionally unenforceable and would be a nightmare at the Nats, which is the only contest where we (AMA) deal with the weight.

13.7 Plummer Safety - No, I think the NSRCA developed proposal was in line with what FAI is doing and was the best proposal for safety.

13.8 NSRCA developed Fail Safe - Yes.

Thanks,

Jon Carter
NSRCA D7 VP



From: "Derek Koopowitz" <derekkoopowitz at comcast.net>
To: "AZ CA, HI, NV,UT" <nsrca-dist7 at lists.nsrca.org>
Sent: Saturday, September 1, 2012 11:30:16 PM
Subject: [NSRCA-dist7] Rules proposals





Everyone,
 
The final vote on the rules proposals is coming up in less than 2 weeks.  The proposals being voted on are listed here:
 
http://www.modelaircraft.org/events/ruleproposals/rcaerobatics.aspx
 
 
Please give me your thoughts and feedback on these proposals…
 
Thanks!
_______________________________________________
NSRCA-dist7 mailing list
NSRCA-dist7 at lists.nsrca.org
http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-dist7

-----Inline Attachment Follows-----


_______________________________________________
NSRCA-dist7 mailing list
NSRCA-dist7 at lists.nsrca.org
http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-dist7
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.nsrca.org/pipermail/nsrca-dist7/attachments/20120904/9e112fc2/attachment.html>