[NSRCA-dist7] Rules proposals

[Peter Vogel]

Me too!

Sent from my iPhone4S

On Sep 3, 2012, at 7:16 PM, Steve Hannah <shannah1806 at gmail.com> wrote:

> I agree with Tony
> 
> 
> 
> On Sep 3, 2012, at 18:33, Anthony Frackowiak <frackowiak at sbcglobal.net> wrote:
> 
>> Fine with 13-2.
>> 
>> Fine with 13-4.
>> 
>> Against 13-6. They should have passed the weight rule by McHarg. They didn't even let that pass the Initial vote.  
>> 
>> Against 13-7. They should have used the wording in the current F3A regulations. Requiring a break to be visible is too much of a bother to enforce. I won't install an arming plug to make this visible and I won't keep my canopy off my model.
>> 
>> Fine with 13-8.
>> 
>> Tony Frackowiak
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> From: Derek Koopowitz <derekkoopowitz at comcast.net>
>> To: "CA, AZ, HI, NV,UT" <nsrca-dist7 at lists.nsrca.org>
>> Sent: Sat, September 1, 2012 11:30:41 PM
>> Subject: [NSRCA-dist7] Rules proposals
>> 
>> Everyone,
>>  
>> The final vote on the rules proposals is coming up in less than 2 weeks.  The proposals being voted on are listed here:
>>  
>> http://www.modelaircraft.org/events/ruleproposals/rcaerobatics.aspx
>>  
>>  
>> Please give me your thoughts and feedback on these proposals…
>>  
>> Thanks!
>> _______________________________________________
>> NSRCA-dist7 mailing list
>> NSRCA-dist7 at lists.nsrca.org
>> http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-dist7
> _______________________________________________
> NSRCA-dist7 mailing list
> NSRCA-dist7 at lists.nsrca.org
> http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-dist7
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.nsrca.org/pipermail/nsrca-dist7/attachments/20120904/4f9a9dd6/attachment.html>