<html>
  <head>
    <meta content="text/html; charset=windows-1252"
      http-equiv="Content-Type">
  </head>
  <body bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000">
    <p>I just noticed I made a minor error in my last statement below
      regarding the vote on the golf ball maneuver.  The vote was
      actually a perfect tie vote.  President Joe Walker decided to
      allow the survey results to be the tie-breaker.  The golf ball
      maneuver was the survey's most contentious maneuver, indicating
      the knife-edge loop should be simplified to a normal wings-level
      loop (with 1/2 rolls instead of 1/4-type rolls). So, that's how we
      selected the final version of the golf ball maneuver. <br>
    </p>
    <p>Sal<br>
    </p>
    <br>
    <div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 10/12/2017 10:10 PM, Sal Piu via
      NSRCA-dist1 wrote:<br>
    </div>
    <blockquote
      cite="mid:ae2d60bc-e51e-033e-ad62-64b8814dbef5@comcast.net"
      type="cite">
      <meta content="text/html; charset=windows-1252"
        http-equiv="Content-Type">
      <font face="Arial"><span style="font-size: 10pt; line-height:
          115%;">D1 folks,<br>
          <br>
               I usually don’t comment about Board of Director’s (BoD)
          meetings as the official meeting notes are always published: I
          thought folks should know what transpired to end up with the
          final Masters 2018-2019 sequence.<span style="">  </span>As
          everyone knows, there was a very large contention with the
          proposed Masters sequence earlier this year that essentially
          revolved around some maneuvers being deemed excessively
          challenging by some pilots, as well as the overall sequence
          not adhering to the sequence committee guidelines established
          several years ago.<span style="">  </span>The BoD made
          recommendations to essentially get the proposed sequence back
          within guidelines as well as address the difficulty aspect.<span
            style="">  </span>The sequence committee responded with a
          counter-proposal. The BoD meeting in October 2017 discussed
          the counter-proposal and made decisions based on districts’
          preferences and survey results.<span style="">  </span>Two
          particular maneuvers were contentious even among the BoD
          members during that meeting.<span style="">  </span>The
          golf-ball maneuver was decided by a margin of only 1 vote in
          favor of keeping it simple with half rolls (the knife-edge ¾
          loop is reduced to a simple wings-level loop).<span style="">  
          </span>The second contentious maneuver was the loop with the
          top 180 half containing either an integrated roll or a 4-point
          roll.<span style="">  </span>The Board originally recommended
          to change this maneuver to include a 4-point roll because, in
          theory, that should be easier to do than an integrated roll
          across the same area. Several folks stated at the board
          meeting that they tried flying both versions of this maneuver
          multiple times: all-that-did discovered the version with the
          4-point roll was actually more difficult to fly than the
          integrated roll. Hence, the board voted to go with the simpler
          integrated roll version.<span style="">  </span>I believe the
          final, BoD-endorsed Masters sequence complies with existing
          sequence committee guidelines in generating new sequences.</span>
      </font>
      <p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom:10.0pt;
        line-height:115%"><font face="Arial"><br>
        </font> </p>
      <font face="Arial"> </font>
      <p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom:10.0pt;
        line-height:115%"><font face="Arial">Sal</font></p>
      <div id="DAB4FAD8-2DD7-40BB-A1B8-4E2AA1F9FDF2"><br>
        <table style="border-top: 1px solid #D3D4DE;">
          <tbody>
            <tr>
              <td style="width: 55px; padding-top: 13px;"><a
                  moz-do-not-send="true"
href="http://www.avg.com/email-signature?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=emailclient"
                  target="_blank"><img moz-do-not-send="true"
src="https://ipmcdn.avast.com/images/icons/icon-envelope-tick-green-avg-v1.png"
                    alt="" style="width: 46px; height: 29px;"
                    height="29" width="46"></a></td>
              <td style="width: 470px; padding-top: 12px; color:
                #41424e; font-size: 13px; font-family: Arial, Helvetica,
                sans-serif; line-height: 18px;">Virus-free. <a
                  moz-do-not-send="true"
href="http://www.avg.com/email-signature?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=emailclient"
                  target="_blank" style="color: #4453ea;">www.avg.com</a>
              </td>
            </tr>
          </tbody>
        </table>
        <a moz-do-not-send="true"
          href="#DAB4FAD8-2DD7-40BB-A1B8-4E2AA1F9FDF2" width="1"
          height="1"> </a></div>
      <br>
      <fieldset class="mimeAttachmentHeader"></fieldset>
      <br>
      <pre wrap="">_______________________________________________
NSRCA-dist1 mailing list
<a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:NSRCA-dist1@lists.nsrca.org">NSRCA-dist1@lists.nsrca.org</a>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-dist1">http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-dist1</a>
</pre>
    </blockquote>
    <br>
  </body>
</html>