<html xmlns:v="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:vml" xmlns:o="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office" xmlns:w="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:word" xmlns:m="http://schemas.microsoft.com/office/2004/12/omml" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-html40"><head><meta http-equiv=Content-Type content="text/html; charset=utf-8"><meta name=Generator content="Microsoft Word 15 (filtered medium)"><style><!--
/* Font Definitions */
@font-face
{font-family:"Cambria Math";
panose-1:2 4 5 3 5 4 6 3 2 4;}
@font-face
{font-family:Calibri;
panose-1:2 15 5 2 2 2 4 3 2 4;}
/* Style Definitions */
p.MsoNormal, li.MsoNormal, div.MsoNormal
{margin:0in;
margin-bottom:.0001pt;
font-size:11.0pt;
font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;}
a:link, span.MsoHyperlink
{mso-style-priority:99;
color:#0563C1;
text-decoration:underline;}
a:visited, span.MsoHyperlinkFollowed
{mso-style-priority:99;
color:#954F72;
text-decoration:underline;}
p.MsoPlainText, li.MsoPlainText, div.MsoPlainText
{mso-style-priority:99;
mso-style-link:"Plain Text Char";
margin:0in;
margin-bottom:.0001pt;
font-size:11.0pt;
font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;}
span.PlainTextChar
{mso-style-name:"Plain Text Char";
mso-style-priority:99;
mso-style-link:"Plain Text";
font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;}
.MsoChpDefault
{mso-style-type:export-only;
font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;}
@page WordSection1
{size:8.5in 11.0in;
margin:1.0in 1.0in 1.0in 1.0in;}
div.WordSection1
{page:WordSection1;}
--></style><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
<o:shapedefaults v:ext="edit" spidmax="1026" />
</xml><![endif]--><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
<o:shapelayout v:ext="edit">
<o:idmap v:ext="edit" data="1" />
</o:shapelayout></xml><![endif]--></head><body lang=EN-US link="#0563C1" vlink="#954F72"><div class=WordSection1><p class=MsoPlainText>Hi Dana and all, <o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoPlainText><o:p> </o:p></p><p class=MsoPlainText>I'm <a little> surprised there's been no chatter on this. Can anyone tell when it is okay to plug in the batteries?<o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoPlainText><i><o:p> </o:p></i></p><p class=MsoPlainText style='margin-left:.5in'><i>For electric powered models, the electric power circuit(s) must not be physically connected, before the starting time is begun or the aircraft is preparing to be taken out to the runway for the flight and must be physically disconnected immediately after removal of the aircraft from the landing area.<o:p></o:p></i></p><p class=MsoPlainText><i><o:p> </o:p></i></p><p class=MsoPlainText><o:p> </o:p></p><p class=MsoPlainText>On telemetry, for those that have it, is there truly a competitive advantage? <o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoPlainText><o:p> </o:p></p><p class=MsoPlainText>I don't see anything wrong with the transmitter telling you what you can already see. Even if you had altitude readouts during a loop, trying to match the entry by listening to readouts will probably result in some pretty ugly geometry. Ok, double stall turn maybe I can see an advantage in clear skies with no backdrop. But if your caller can offer hints “…3, 2, 1, now!”, why can't the transmitter?<o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoPlainText><o:p> </o:p></p><p class=MsoPlainText>I think feedback may even be a disadvantage as you'd be too busy processing that data instead of concentrating on the next maneuver. I imagine it would be difficult to stay ahead of the aircraft and listen/respond to telemetry. Caller: "right rudder....no, your other right!"<o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoPlainText><o:p> </o:p></p><p class=MsoPlainText>I would have a problem if the transmitter or onboard system initiated a corrective action; that obviously shouldn't happen.<o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoPlainText><o:p> </o:p></p><p class=MsoPlainText>Flame suit on! Let's hear your thoughts. Thinking about getting a Jeti Duplex for next season so I can experience it first-hand.<o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoPlainText><o:p> </o:p></p><p class=MsoPlainText>Scott<o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoPlainText><o:p> </o:p></p><p class=MsoPlainText>-----Original Message-----<br>From: NSRCA-dist1 [mailto:nsrca-dist1-bounces@lists.nsrca.org] On Behalf Of Dana Beaton via NSRCA-dist1<br>Sent: Thursday, January 1, 2015 9:09 AM<br>To: CT, DE, ME, MD, MA, NH, NJ, NY, PA, RI, VT<br>Subject: [NSRCA-dist1] Rules Proposals</p><p class=MsoPlainText><o:p> </o:p></p><p class=MsoPlainText>Happy New Year D1!<o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoPlainText><o:p> </o:p></p><p class=MsoPlainText>I suppose it is a bit dicey reading the NSRCA rules change proposals on New Years Day with a tasty Bloody Mary in hand, but hey, our house guest is still asleep and the new K-factor is out LOL! I don’t see anything objectionable in the proposals and like most of what I see after a quick read: Of course, I may see it differently on another day and/or after hearing what fellow D1 members think. Thoughts? Cheers!<o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoPlainText>_______________________________________________<o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoPlainText>NSRCA-dist1 mailing list<o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoPlainText><a href="mailto:NSRCA-dist1@lists.nsrca.org"><span style='color:windowtext;text-decoration:none'>NSRCA-dist1@lists.nsrca.org</span></a><o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoPlainText><a href="http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-dist1"><span style='color:windowtext;text-decoration:none'>http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-dist1</span></a><o:p></o:p></p></div></body></html>