[NSRCA-dist1] Telemetry

[Dave Lockhart]

Is FPV telemetry?  How about a HUD showing the flight path of the plane overlayed on a geometric box?  With incremental displays of each maneuver?

 

No telemetry…other than for specific safety purposes.

 

Regards,

 

Dave

 

From: NSRCA-dist1 [mailto:nsrca-dist1-bounces at lists.nsrca.org] On Behalf Of Scott Smith via NSRCA-dist1
Sent: Wednesday, January 07, 2015 5:58 PM
To: learn2turn at yahoo.com; 'CT, DE, ME, MD, MA, NH, NJ, NY, PA, RI, VT'
Subject: Re: [NSRCA-dist1] Telemetry

 

I hear what you’re trying to say but don’t we labor over color schemes (well, not me) to provide info on attitude?  Don’t we listen intently to the prop noise to get clues on airspeed?  And callers whispering hints?

 

I think the intent is the pilot fly the airplane.  Anything that introduces an automatic correction to a control based on onboard sensors (gyros, autopilots, GPS, altimeter, maybe timers, whatever) is what should be illegal.

 

I say give the pilot as much data as they can process…as long as only they process it.  Telemetry is cheap and becoming standard fare, let’s embrace it!

 

 

Ken,

 

I had a crazy year last year.  Both son’s each bought a house, a new granddaughter, my youngest graduated high school and went off to college…I’m lucky to have survived!  So I didn’t get a chance to meet you in 2014.  2015 is looking much better for pattern.  I am fortunate to represent D1 on the Aerobatics Board so I will be voting on your behalf (assuming you’re AMA D1).  Admittedly  I am stirring the pot a little to get a conversation going so I can hear your opinions.  Thanks for voicing yours!

 

Scott 

 

From: NSRCA-dist1 [mailto:nsrca-dist1-bounces at lists.nsrca.org] On Behalf Of learn2turn via NSRCA-dist1
Sent: Wednesday, January 7, 2015 2:13 PM
To: nsrca-dist1 at lists.nsrca.org
Subject: [NSRCA-dist1] Telemetry

 

I'm a newbie by my $0.02 on telemetry is anything that would provide info on flight characteristics-- altitude, attitude, airspeed, climb rate, g-force, etc. would certainly be against the spirit of flying the plane via manual controls based on VLOS POV.  I don't think it should be legal.

 

-Ken K.

 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.nsrca.org/pipermail/nsrca-dist1/attachments/20150108/64e5a861/attachment.html>