<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=iso-8859-1">
<meta name="Generator" content="Microsoft Exchange Server">
<!-- converted from text --><style><!-- .EmailQuote { margin-left: 1pt; padding-left: 4pt; border-left: #800000 2px solid; } --></style>
</head>
<body>
<div>
<div id="x_compose-container" itemscope="" itemtype="https://schema.org/EmailMessage" style="direction:ltr">
<span itemprop="creator" itemscope="" itemtype="https://schema.org/Organization"><span itemprop="name"></span></span>
<div>
<div>
<div style="direction:ltr">Maybe not (though it is FAR more likely, especially if they armed it, which is what I always have my callers (who are sometimes sportsman pilots) do). Further, even if they don’t, People in the pits can SEE that it is still armed,
which is PART OF THE POINT. </div>
</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div class="x_acompli_signature">Get <a href="https://aka.ms/o0ukef">Outlook for iOS</a></div>
</div>
</div>
<hr tabindex="-1" style="display:inline-block; width:98%">
<div id="x_divRplyFwdMsg" dir="ltr"><font face="Calibri, sans-serif" color="#000000" style="font-size:11pt"><b>From:</b> NSRCA-discussion <nsrca-discussion-bounces@lists.nsrca.org> on behalf of Bob Kane via NSRCA-discussion <nsrca-discussion@lists.nsrca.org><br>
<b>Sent:</b> Thursday, September 27, 2018 7:32:47 AM<br>
<b>To:</b> Ken Dunlap; General pattern discussion; ronlock@comcast.net<br>
<b>Subject:</b> Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Arming Device for electric airplanes</font>
<div> </div>
</div>
</div>
<font size="2"><span style="font-size:11pt;">
<div class="PlainText">Except the unfamiliar/inexperienced caller would probably not remove the arming plug either . . .<br>
<br>
Bob Kane getterflash@yahoo.com<br>
<br>
--------------------------------------------<br>
On Thu, 9/27/18, ronlock--- via NSRCA-discussion <nsrca-discussion@lists.nsrca.org> wrote:<br>
<br>
Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Arming Device for electric airplanes<br>
To: "Ken Dunlap" <kdunlap@hotmail.com>, "General pattern discussion" <nsrca-discussion@lists.nsrca.org><br>
Date: Thursday, September 27, 2018, 10:17 AM<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
Among our challenges to follow a<br>
procedure .... Plane lands,<br>
flight is complete. While a<br>
helper/ caller, perhaps unfamiliar with that<br>
specific airplane, retrieves it from the runway, the<br>
pilot gets involved in a conversation - how flight went,<br>
that he is needed to judge, to call for someone, else,<br>
etc. Similar items may be pulling on the<br>
helper/caller. Plane now sits where? For how<br>
long? And is disarmed? A clearly<br>
visible arming plug would be a big help.<br>
Ron Lockhart<br>
On September 26, 2018 at 8:14 PM<br>
Ken Dunlap via NSRCA-discussion<br>
<nsrca-discussion@lists.nsrca.org> wrote: <br>
<br>
Well, I am going to<br>
chime in with my experience. I use the Arm-safe. I have over<br>
1000+ flights on airplanes with this system and it has been<br>
bulletproof. I know there are thoughts about single points<br>
of failure etc etc. But here's my experience.. I have<br>
never seen an arming system fail, but I have seen countless<br>
airplanes go careening off into fences and fields because<br>
the pilot forgot to deactivate his/her airplane. I am<br>
entirely supportive of an arming rule that requires a hard<br>
disconnect of the airplane.<br>
Cheers,Ken <br>
<br>
_______________________________________________<br>
NSRCA-discussion mailing list<br>
NSRCA-discussion@lists.nsrca.org<br>
<a href="http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion">http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion</a><br>
-----Inline Attachment Follows-----<br>
<br>
<br>
_______________________________________________<br>
NSRCA-discussion mailing list<br>
NSRCA-discussion@lists.nsrca.org<br>
<a href="http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion">http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion</a></div>
</span></font>
</body>
</html>