<html><head><meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"></head><body dir="auto"><div><span></span></div><div><meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"><div>I understand that’s your view Jon, but it doesn’t say that. If you would like to change what it says to eliminate any room for interpretation, you’re certainly free to do that. </div><div><br></div><div>The survey was based on the official proposals as outlined in the AMA rule and NSRCA charter and guidelines. If we are to strictly adhere to the survey results, there was no absolute majority that objected to the official proposals. However, to respond to the survey input, the BoD and Sequence committee agreed on a compromise to a few masters maneuvers. </div><div><br></div><div>See attached. Masters is the only thing that changed. Intermediate and Advanced are fully approved as submitted. </div><div><br></div><div>Enjoy!</div><div></div></div></body></html>