<!DOCTYPE html>
<html><head>
<meta charset="UTF-8">
</head><body><p>I don't think we should try to interpret the pilots state of mind, (nor a possible radio glitch).<br></p><p>I'd downgrade 5 pts per rule.<br></p><p>Ron Lockhart<br></p><blockquote type="cite">On August 7, 2017 at 9:08 AM Daniel Underkofler via NSRCA-discussion <nsrca-discussion@lists.nsrca.org> wrote:<br><br><div dir="ltr">Have to disagree Vince.<div>If turbulence causes a wings out-of-level condition, there is no downgrade if the pilot corrects quickly.</div><div>In this scenario, where, as you state, it is clearly a pilot error, he gets 1 pt per 15deg = 5pt downgrade. He should not be penalized for making the correction - that would be double jeopardy, which is dealt with in the rules.</div><div>Dan</div></div><div class="ox-9a6b24e886-gmail_extra"><br><div class="ox-9a6b24e886-gmail_quote">On Mon, Aug 7, 2017 at 7:02 AM, Vicente Bortone via NSRCA-discussion <<a href="mailto:nsrca-discussion@lists.nsrca.org" target="_blank">nsrca-discussion@lists.nsrca.org</a>> wrote:<br><blockquote><div dir="ltr"><div>Hi Don,</div><div><br></div><div>75 degree roll is more than expected for a correction due to turbulence. Therefore, clearly it has been done by the pilot and cannot be interpreted as a correction due to turbulence that is the only one allowed in the rulebook. Therefore, the option No1 appears the best option since the pilot introduced an element that was not suppose to be there.</div><div><br></div><div>Best,</div><div> </div></div><div class="ox-9a6b24e886-gmail_extra"><br clear="all"><div><div class="ox-9a6b24e886-m_-7656359936085761066gmail_signature">Vicente "Vince" Bortone</div></div><br><div class="ox-9a6b24e886-gmail_quote">On Mon, Aug 7, 2017 at 7:21 AM, Don Ramsey via NSRCA-discussion <<a href="mailto:nsrca-discussion@lists.nsrca.org" target="_blank">nsrca-discussion@lists.nsrca.<wbr/>org</a>> wrote:<br><blockquote><div><div class="ox-9a6b24e886-m_-7656359936085761066m_-6333914503827647746WordSection1"><div><div><div><div><p class="ox-9a6b24e886-MsoNormal"><span style="color: rgb(31, 73, 125); font-family: "Calibri","sans-serif"; font-size: 11pt;">Another judging question:<u></u><u></u></span></p><p class="ox-9a6b24e886-MsoNormal"><span style="color: rgb(31, 73, 125); font-family: "Calibri","sans-serif"; font-size: 11pt;"><u></u> <u></u></span></p><p class="ox-9a6b24e886-MsoNormal"><span style="color: rgb(31, 73, 125); font-family: "Calibri","sans-serif"; font-size: 11pt;">Senario: An upline is flown that requires no rolls. The pilot executes a partial roll that turns about 75 degrees then immediately returns to vertical as specified in the maneuver description. <u></u><u></u></span></p><p class="ox-9a6b24e886-MsoNormal"><span style="color: rgb(31, 73, 125); font-family: "Calibri","sans-serif"; font-size: 11pt;"><u></u> <u></u></span></p><p class="ox-9a6b24e886-MsoNormal"><span style="color: rgb(31, 73, 125); font-family: "Calibri","sans-serif"; font-size: 11pt;">Two choices seem to be available:<u></u><u></u></span></p><p class="ox-9a6b24e886-m_-7656359936085761066m_-6333914503827647746MsoListParagraphCxSpFirst"><u></u><span style="color: rgb(31, 73, 125); font-family: "Calibri","sans-serif"; font-size: 11pt;">1.<span style="font: 7pt/normal "Times New Roman"; font-size-adjust: none; font-stretch: normal;"> </span></span><u></u><span style="color: rgb(31, 73, 125); font-family: "Calibri","sans-serif"; font-size: 11pt;"> 0 the maneuver because 2 turns have been made that require 5 pt downgrade each. Errors are initial roll and roll that returns the mode to the correct attitude.<u></u><u></u></span></p><p class="ox-9a6b24e886-m_-7656359936085761066m_-6333914503827647746MsoListParagraphCxSpLast"><u></u><span style="color: rgb(31, 73, 125); font-family: "Calibri","sans-serif"; font-size: 11pt;">2.<span style="font: 7pt/normal "Times New Roman"; font-size-adjust: none; font-stretch: normal;"> </span></span><u></u><span style="color: rgb(31, 73, 125); font-family: "Calibri","sans-serif"; font-size: 11pt;"> Score it a 5 because only one error was made and a correction was made to return the model to the correct attitude. Do not downgrade the correction.<u></u><u></u></span></p></div></div></div></div></div></div><br>______________________________<wbr/>_________________<br> NSRCA-discussion mailing list<br> <a href="mailto:NSRCA-discussion@lists.nsrca.org" target="_blank">NSRCA-discussion@lists.nsrca.o<wbr/>rg</a><br> <a href="http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion" target="_blank">http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman<wbr/>/listinfo/nsrca-discussion</a><br></blockquote></div><br></div><br>______________________________<wbr/>_________________<br> NSRCA-discussion mailing list<br> <a href="mailto:NSRCA-discussion@lists.nsrca.org">NSRCA-discussion@lists.nsrca.<wbr/>org</a><br> <a href="http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion" target="_blank">http://lists.nsrca.org/<wbr/>mailman/listinfo/nsrca-<wbr/>discussion</a><br></blockquote></div><br></div>_______________________________________________<br>NSRCA-discussion mailing list<br>NSRCA-discussion@lists.nsrca.org<br>http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion</blockquote></body></html>