<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=Windows-1252">
<style type="text/css" style="display:none;"><!-- P {margin-top:0;margin-bottom:0;} --></style>
</head>
<body dir="ltr">
<div id="divtagdefaultwrapper" style="color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-family: Calibri,Helvetica,sans-serif,"EmojiFont","Apple Color Emoji","Segoe UI Emoji",NotoColorEmoji,"Segoe UI Symbol","Android Emoji",EmojiSymbols,'EmojiFont','Apple Color Emoji', 'Segoe UI Emoji', NotoColorEmoji, 'Segoe UI Symbol', 'Android Emoji', EmojiSymbols; font-size: 12pt;" dir="ltr">
<p>There are still too many new maneuvers introduced to the eligible maneuvers list. Only a couple should be introduced each rules cycle if necessary. That was part of the intent of the guide. Battery consumption is too high with the low drag plane and motor
combination that you use Mark in comparison to others. I'm assuming this is the sequence that is on the NSRCA site.<br>
</p>
<p><br>
</p>
<p>A few of the maneuvers are just fabricated garbage. When the guide was put together it was done to keep getting carried away with this stuff and adding a boat load of "Oh, this would be cool to do" type maneuvers which have already infiltrated FAI. There
is a lot of stupidity designed into the sequence. </p>
<p><br>
</p>
<p>A fellow Masters pilot tried to fly some of this this weekend and concluded it was a bunch of crap, ripped it up and threw it into the garbage.</p>
<p><br>
I had an Advanced pilot fly the new sequence for Advanced this weekend also. The Cobra with snap may be an issue.</p>
<p><br>
</p>
<p>There are also a lot of 3/4 rolls in the sequence that an Advanced pilot will have to figure out which way to roll. This may be an information overload requirement that might be overcome by a lot more practice than typically required. You only have some
much time available to practice. The designers did not do a thorough analysis of the roll elements.</p>
<p><br>
</p>
<p>I firmly believe we need to dumb down on Masters. The current one is already difficult and requires more practice time than I would care to put into flying pattern. The fun is starting to dissipate for this flyer and I'm retired.
</p>
<p><br>
</p>
<p>Not everyone can get out several evenings during the week and the weekend to practice. I'm thinking of the 95% not the top 5% and I'm a middle of the road Masters pilot. I have also seen decline in Masters attendance on the local level. Based on what I see
so far, I will either pack it in or reluctantly drop to Advanced which has crept ever closer towards being a Masters sequence. This is the first time I have seen so much controversy over one sequence. Start fresh. There is still time to form a new committee
hopefully with some people who previously served and get this thing right. There is still plenty of time to get it right by December 31st. Heck I could do it all on my own and come up with something more sane that what has been proposed or thrown out in this
discussion list! <br>
</p>
<div style="color: rgb(0, 0, 0);">
<hr tabindex="-1" style="width: 98%; display: inline-block;">
<div id="divRplyFwdMsg" dir="ltr"><font color="#000000" face="Calibri, sans-serif" style="font-size: 11pt;"><b>From:</b> NSRCA-discussion <nsrca-discussion-bounces@lists.nsrca.org> on behalf of Atwood, Mark via NSRCA-discussion <nsrca-discussion@lists.nsrca.org><br>
<b>Sent:</b> Monday, July 17, 2017 8:09 AM<br>
<b>To:</b> nsrca-discussion@lists.nsrca.org<br>
<b>Subject:</b> [NSRCA-discussion] New sequences</font>
<div> </div>
</div>
<div>Hey All,
<div><br>
<div>
<div>I was able to fly both the proposed Masters and Advanced sequences this weekend with Chuck Edwards. All in all good, with a few thoughts.<br>
<font color="#5856d6"><br>
</font><b>Masters</b> - </div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>I like it. Flows reasonably well. Some fun challenges, but nothing daunting. The two rolls opposite is easily the prettiest maneuver in the schedule, and it will separate anyone not comfortable rolling both ways. </div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div><b>One concern</b> - The only sticky maneuver I thought is the 1 1/4, KE flight, 1 1/4. It’s simply too long to make look pretty, and if it’s a strong head wind, will really look like crap. You’re basically trying to fit 2 1/2 rolls AND sustained KE
flight on a downwind leg and stay in the box, thus forcing somewhat rapid rolls which simply look rushed. <br>
<font color="#5856d6"><br>
</font>I would strongly suggest changing it to 3/4 roll, KE, 3/4 roll. Same difficulty really, but a full roll shorter and thus allows for a more graceful, controlled roll rate.<br>
<font color="#5856d6"><br>
</font>Total Mah draw in modest wind (7-9kt cross) was 3580mah without paying particular attention to throttle management, given that it was the first time through the sequence. Quite a bit less time and power than the current schedule.</div>
<div><br>
<font color="#5856d6"><br>
</font><b>Advanced</b>. </div>
<div>It’s also nice, with one <i>major</i> concern. The Cobra. It’s not as conventional as I think is expected, and I feel it’s too much for an advanced flyer just learning to snap their airplane (my opinion). You’re already a bit rushed going into is, and
you’re pushing in from Inverted. No biggie. Half roll up, over the top and back down on a 45. THEN you have a single snap on the 45 deg DOWN line. <br>
<font color="#5856d6"><br>
</font>I can tell you from personal experience and a re-kitted Spark (St. Clairsville flying F-11 with a 1 1/2 snap down on the cobra) that a snap like this
<b>WILL </b>crash an airplane. You’re heading down, not all that high to begin with, and if you badly miss the snap and lose your orientation, you’re likely on low throttle and low airspeed and will proceed to stall/snap it into the ground in your attempt
to recover. I’d much rather see a snap on the UP leg of the cobra. It would still be rushed, but FAR more airplane and pilot friendly. <br>
<font color="#5856d6"><br>
</font>Other than that, is has all the traditional challenges. Power was very low as I flew the schedule with only 2800mah (also a 7-9kt crosswind). <br>
</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>My $0.02 worth with 1 time through Advanced and twice through Masters. So limited testing. Your mileage may vary.<br>
<font color="#5856d6"><br>
</font>Hope to see a bunch of you in Arkansas! <br>
<font color="#5856d6"><br>
</font>-Mark<br>
<strong style="font-family: Calibri,sans-serif; font-size: 11pt;"><span style="color: rgb(101, 100, 106); font-family: Lato,sans-serif;">MARK </span></strong><strong style="font-family: Calibri,sans-serif; font-size: 11pt;"><span style="color: rgb(128, 189, 1); font-family: Lato,sans-serif;">ATWOOD</span></strong><br>
<span style="color: rgb(101, 100, 106); font-family: Lato,sans-serif; font-size: 10pt;">o. (440) 229-2502</span><br>
<span style="color: rgb(101, 100, 106); font-family: Lato,sans-serif; font-size: 10pt;">c. (216) 316-2489</span><br>
<span style="color: rgb(101, 100, 106); font-family: Lato,sans-serif; font-size: 10pt;">e. </span><a style="font-family: Calibri,sans-serif; font-size: 11pt;" href="mailto:atwoodm@paragon-inc.com"><span style="color: rgb(101, 100, 106); font-family: Lato,sans-serif; font-size: 10pt;">atwoodm@paragon-inc.com</span></a><br>
<font color="#5856d6" face="Calibri, sans-serif"><span style="font-size: 14.66px;"><br>
</span></font><strong style="font-family: Calibri,sans-serif; font-size: 11pt;"><span style="color: rgb(101, 100, 106); font-family: Lato,sans-serif; font-size: 10pt;">Paragon Consulting, Inc.</span></strong><br>
<span style="color: rgb(101, 100, 106); font-family: Lato,sans-serif; font-size: 10pt;">5900 Landerbrook Drive, Suite 205, Cleveland Ohio, 44124</span><br>
<a style="color: purple; font-family: Lato,sans-serif; font-size: 10pt;" href="http://www.paragon-inc.com/">www.paragon-inc.com</a><br>
<div id="ox-71f698cf22">
<div>
<div>
<div style="text-transform: none; text-indent: 0px; word-spacing: 0px; white-space: normal;">
<div style="text-transform: none; text-indent: 0px; word-spacing: 0px; white-space: normal;">
<div style="text-transform: none; text-indent: 0px; word-spacing: 0px; white-space: normal;">
<div style="text-transform: none; text-indent: 0px; word-spacing: 0px; white-space: normal;">
<div style="text-transform: none; text-indent: 0px; word-spacing: 0px; white-space: normal;">
<div style="text-transform: none; text-indent: 0px; word-spacing: 0px; white-space: normal;">
<div>
<div>
<div style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt; font-family: "Times New Roman",serif; font-size: 12pt;">
<div style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt; text-transform: none; text-indent: 0px; font-family: Calibri,sans-serif; font-size: 11pt; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; word-spacing: 0px; white-space: normal;">
<div style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt; font-size: 11pt;">
<div style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt; font-size: 11pt;"><span style="color: rgb(101, 100, 106); font-size: 2pt;"> </span></div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<br>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</body>
</html>