<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=iso-8859-1">
<style type="text/css" style="display:none;"><!-- P {margin-top:0;margin-bottom:0;} --></style>
</head>
<body dir="ltr">
<div id="divtagdefaultwrapper" style="font-size:12pt;color:#000000;font-family:Calibri,Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif;" dir="ltr">
<p>Any up dates on the RV sites<br>
</p>
<br>
<br>
<div style="color: rgb(0, 0, 0);">
<div>
<hr tabindex="-1" style="width: 98%; display: inline-block;">
<div id="x_divRplyFwdMsg" dir="ltr"><font color="#000000" face="Calibri, sans-serif" style="font-size: 11pt;"><b>From:</b> NSRCA-discussion <nsrca-discussion-bounces@lists.nsrca.org> on behalf of Dr. Mike Harrison via NSRCA-discussion <nsrca-discussion@lists.nsrca.org><br>
<b>Sent:</b> Monday, June 5, 2017 8:29 PM<br>
<b>To:</b> 'Whodaddy Whodaddy'; 'General pattern discussion'<br>
<b>Subject:</b> Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Mike Harrison</font>
<div> </div>
</div>
</div>
<font size="2"><span style="font-size: 10pt;">
<div class="PlainText">Thanks Gary,<br>
I do understand the discontent, however, the point is to make it a quality<br>
event. I am going under the assumption you read my explanation for all this.<br>
If you consider the caliber of judging when you basically have 8 rounds of<br>
finals-masters,fai- in 1 day, how do you maintain quality of judging? <br>
The quality of flying is very high yet it is ok to use unexperienced<br>
haphazard judges? You yourself complained about how much money time and<br>
effort you are going to spend doing this but you are willing to take<br>
whatever is available for judges? Doesn't make sense. <br>
That is what has happened in the past. <br>
You are upset because you can't fly 2 more flights after having flown 8<br>
flights not counting all the practice flights. <br>
This is not a marathon event. The purpose is to select the best pilot to<br>
the best of our ability. 8 flights should be enough.<br>
I cannot promise you the best judges even under this new system but it is<br>
important to try something else.<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
Regards,<br>
Mike <br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
-----Original Message-----<br>
From: NSRCA-discussion [<a href="mailto:nsrca-discussion-bounces@lists.nsrca.org">mailto:nsrca-discussion-bounces@lists.nsrca.org</a>] On<br>
Behalf Of Whodaddy Whodaddy via NSRCA-discussion<br>
Sent: Saturday, June 3, 2017 5:38 PM<br>
To: nsrca-discussion@lists.nsrca.org<br>
Subject: [NSRCA-discussion] Mike Harrison<br>
<br>
I have communicated with many entrants for the NATS this year that are not<br>
happy with the plan for the finals in masters and FAI .. <br>
I guess i get to be the poster boy for discontent over this ... <br>
IE it seems you are not taking suggestions or input from a general<br>
membership ... <br>
<br>
While many appreciate the effort it takes to run an event like this the<br>
notion of cutting off the finals to two rounds and flying FAI in the<br>
afternoon seems off base for many reasons ...<br>
I do appreciate your effort and hard work and wish you to reconsider these<br>
plans ... <br>
<br>
The legacy of the event is after all in your hands<br>
<br>
Gary <br>
<br>
Sent from my iPhone<br>
_______________________________________________<br>
NSRCA-discussion mailing list<br>
NSRCA-discussion@lists.nsrca.org<br>
<a href="http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion">http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion</a><br>
<br>
_______________________________________________<br>
NSRCA-discussion mailing list<br>
NSRCA-discussion@lists.nsrca.org<br>
<a href="http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion">http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion</a><br>
</div>
</span></font></div>
</div>
</body>
</html>