<html xmlns:v="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:vml" xmlns:o="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office" xmlns:w="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:word" xmlns:m="http://schemas.microsoft.com/office/2004/12/omml" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-html40"><head><meta http-equiv=Content-Type content="text/html; charset=utf-8"><meta name=Generator content="Microsoft Word 15 (filtered medium)"><!--[if !mso]><style>v\:* {behavior:url(#default#VML);}
o\:* {behavior:url(#default#VML);}
w\:* {behavior:url(#default#VML);}
.shape {behavior:url(#default#VML);}
</style><![endif]--><style><!--
/* Font Definitions */
@font-face
{font-family:"Cambria Math";
panose-1:2 4 5 3 5 4 6 3 2 4;}
@font-face
{font-family:Calibri;
panose-1:2 15 5 2 2 2 4 3 2 4;}
@font-face
{font-family:Tahoma;
panose-1:2 11 6 4 3 5 4 4 2 4;}
@font-face
{font-family:"Segoe UI Symbol";
panose-1:2 11 5 2 4 2 4 2 2 3;}
/* Style Definitions */
p.MsoNormal, li.MsoNormal, div.MsoNormal
{margin:0in;
margin-bottom:.0001pt;
font-size:12.0pt;
font-family:"Times New Roman",serif;}
a:link, span.MsoHyperlink
{mso-style-priority:99;
color:blue;
text-decoration:underline;}
a:visited, span.MsoHyperlinkFollowed
{mso-style-priority:99;
color:purple;
text-decoration:underline;}
p
{mso-style-priority:99;
margin:0in;
margin-bottom:.0001pt;
font-size:12.0pt;
font-family:"Times New Roman",serif;}
span.EmailStyle18
{mso-style-type:personal-reply;
font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;
color:#1F497D;}
.MsoChpDefault
{mso-style-type:export-only;
font-size:10.0pt;}
@page WordSection1
{size:8.5in 11.0in;
margin:1.0in 1.0in 1.0in 1.0in;}
div.WordSection1
{page:WordSection1;}
--></style><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
<o:shapedefaults v:ext="edit" spidmax="1026" />
</xml><![endif]--><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
<o:shapelayout v:ext="edit">
<o:idmap v:ext="edit" data="1" />
</o:shapelayout></xml><![endif]--></head><body lang=EN-US link=blue vlink=purple><div class=WordSection1><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;color:#1F497D'>If 50grams sends a person home, I think you have a silly rule. Just saying….<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><a name="_MailEndCompose"><span style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;color:#1F497D'><o:p> </o:p></span></a></p><div><div style='border:none;border-top:solid #E1E1E1 1.0pt;padding:3.0pt 0in 0in 0in'><p class=MsoNormal><b><span style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif'>From:</span></b><span style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif'> NSRCA-discussion [mailto:nsrca-discussion-bounces@lists.nsrca.org] <b>On Behalf Of </b>Randy Forbus via NSRCA-discussion<br><b>Sent:</b> Saturday, January 28, 2017 6:20 AM<br><b>To:</b> Dr. Mike Harrison <drmikedds@sbcglobal.net>; General pattern discussion <nsrca-discussion@lists.nsrca.org><br><b>Subject:</b> Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Rules Proposal Cycle?<o:p></o:p></span></p></div></div><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p><div id=divtagdefaultwrapper><p><span style='font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;color:black'> I think the point is , if a person drives 20 hours to the Nats , and then gets turned away because he is 50 grams overweight, that person wont be going to the Nats anymore, everyone knows the rules, but you can do everything right and still be over weight.<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal style='margin-bottom:12.0pt'><span style='font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;color:black'><o:p> </o:p></span></p><div><div class=MsoNormal align=center style='text-align:center'><span style='font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;color:black'><hr size=2 width="98%" align=center></span></div><div id=divRplyFwdMsg><p class=MsoNormal><b><span style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;color:black'>From:</span></b><span style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;color:black'> NSRCA-discussion <<a href="mailto:nsrca-discussion-bounces@lists.nsrca.org">nsrca-discussion-bounces@lists.nsrca.org</a>> on behalf of Dr. Mike Harrison via NSRCA-discussion <<a href="mailto:nsrca-discussion@lists.nsrca.org">nsrca-discussion@lists.nsrca.org</a>><br><b>Sent:</b> Thursday, January 26, 2017 4:27 PM<br><b>To:</b> 'John Fuqua'; 'General pattern discussion'<br><b>Subject:</b> Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Rules Proposal Cycle?</span><span style='font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;color:black'> <o:p></o:p></span></p><div><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;color:black'> <o:p></o:p></span></p></div></div><div><div><p><span style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;color:#1F497D'>What I take away from here is that there are very good points by all. </span><span style='color:black'><o:p></o:p></span></p><p><span style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;color:#1F497D'> </span><span style='color:black'><o:p></o:p></span></p><div><div style='border:none;border-top:solid windowtext 1.0pt;padding:3.0pt 0in 0in 0in;border-color:currentColor currentColor;border-image: none'><p><b><span style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;color:black'>From:</span></b><span style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;color:black'> NSRCA-discussion [<a href="mailto:nsrca-discussion-bounces@lists.nsrca.org">mailto:nsrca-discussion-bounces@lists.nsrca.org</a>] <b>On Behalf Of </b>John Fuqua via NSRCA-discussion<br><b>Sent:</b> Thursday, January 26, 2017 8:26 AM<br><b>To:</b> 'General pattern discussion' <<a href="mailto:nsrca-discussion@lists.nsrca.org">nsrca-discussion@lists.nsrca.org</a>><br><b>Subject:</b> Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Rules Proposal Cycle?</span><span style='color:black'><o:p></o:p></span></p></div></div><p><span style='color:black'> <o:p></o:p></span></p><p><span style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;color:#1F497D'>Agree totally. Weight is a false flag for Masters and FAI. It made some sense to raise the weight for the lower classes as they often fly pass down previously owned planes which tend to grow in weight as they are passed around.</span><span style='color:black'><o:p></o:p></span></p><p><span style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;color:#1F497D'> </span><span style='color:black'><o:p></o:p></span></p><p><span style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;color:#1F497D'>My fear has always been the law of unintended consequences when a radical change is made without fully appreciating the ingenuity of the pattern people. </span><span style='color:black'><o:p></o:p></span></p><p><span style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;color:#1F497D'> </span><span style='color:black'><o:p></o:p></span></p><p><span style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;color:#1F497D'> </span><span style='color:black'><o:p></o:p></span></p><div><div style='border:none;border-top:solid windowtext 1.0pt;padding:3.0pt 0in 0in 0in;border-color:currentColor currentColor;border-image: none'><p><b><span style='font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Tahoma",sans-serif;color:black'>From:</span></b><span style='font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Tahoma",sans-serif;color:black'> NSRCA-discussion [<a href="mailto:nsrca-discussion-bounces@lists.nsrca.org">mailto:nsrca-discussion-bounces@lists.nsrca.org</a>] <b>On Behalf Of </b>Dave Lockhart via NSRCA-discussion<br><b>Sent:</b> Thursday, January 26, 2017 7:45 AM<br><b>To:</b> 'General pattern discussion'<br><b>Subject:</b> Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Rules Proposal Cycle?</span><span style='color:black'><o:p></o:p></span></p></div></div><p><span style='color:black'> <o:p></o:p></span></p><p><span style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;color:#1F497D'>IF all other things are equal, heavier does not fly better. The “IF” is rarely (if ever) considered by proponents of raising the weight limit.</span><span style='color:black'><o:p></o:p></span></p><p><span style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;color:#1F497D'> </span><span style='color:black'><o:p></o:p></span></p><p><span style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;color:#1F497D'>IF the added weight is used to increase power, size, or performance, it is an advantage that will raise the performance (and cost) and nothing changes except the cost has increased for everyone. The reason so many planes are close to the limits is because they have been designed for the greatest performance available within the limits, by pushing right up to the limits.</span><span style='color:black'><o:p></o:p></span></p><p><span style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;color:#1F497D'> </span><span style='color:black'><o:p></o:p></span></p><p><span style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;color:#1F497D'>Most airplane designers have recommended equipment to complete the plane at or below the weight limit. The electric “pigs” that won’t make the weight limit are ALL the modern day large 2M planes when equipped with the heaviest motor, heaviest motor batteries, heaviest RX/servo power supply (dual redundant everything with 10 amp magnetic switches), heaviest servos, heaviest linkages, heaviest wheels, plethora of telemetry sensors, etc. Any airplane can be made overweight. If someone has the opinion it is ok to be less competitive for being overweight, being less competitive with a smaller plane that does make weight is pretty much the same scenario (but is legal to the letter of the rules).</span><span style='color:black'><o:p></o:p></span></p><p><span style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;color:#1F497D'> </span><span style='color:black'><o:p></o:p></span></p><p><span style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;color:#1F497D'>I don’t think we get a lot of new people flying pattern at the NATs…which…in practice is the only contest where weight is checked. In the northeast US, any number of contests have advertised waivers of the weight limit, and in ~20 years, there have been very few overweight entrants, and I can’t think of any pattern converts as a result of waiving the weight limit.</span><span style='color:black'><o:p></o:p></span></p><p><span style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;color:#1F497D'> </span><span style='color:black'><o:p></o:p></span></p><p><span style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;color:#1F497D'>Regards,</span><span style='color:black'><o:p></o:p></span></p><p><span style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;color:#1F497D'> </span><span style='color:black'><o:p></o:p></span></p><p><span style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;color:#1F497D'>Dave</span><span style='color:black'><o:p></o:p></span></p><p><span style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;color:#1F497D'> </span><span style='color:black'><o:p></o:p></span></p><div><div style='border:none;border-top:solid windowtext 1.0pt;padding:3.0pt 0in 0in 0in;border-color:currentColor currentColor;border-image: none'><p><b><span style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;color:black'>From:</span></b><span style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;color:black'> NSRCA-discussion [<a href="mailto:nsrca-discussion-bounces@lists.nsrca.org">mailto:nsrca-discussion-bounces@lists.nsrca.org</a>] <b>On Behalf Of </b>Oscar via NSRCA-discussion<br><b>Sent:</b> Wednesday, January 25, 2017 9:27 PM<br><b>To:</b> Patternpilot One <<a href="mailto:patternpilot1@hotmail.com">patternpilot1@hotmail.com</a>>; General pattern discussion <<a href="mailto:nsrca-discussion@lists.nsrca.org">nsrca-discussion@lists.nsrca.org</a>><br><b>Subject:</b> Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Rules Proposal Cycle?</span><span style='color:black'><o:p></o:p></span></p></div></div><p><span style='color:black'> <o:p></o:p></span></p><div><p><span style='font-family:"Segoe UI Symbol",sans-serif;color:black'>😀😀😀</span><span style='color:black'><o:p></o:p></span></p></div><div><p><span style='color:black'><br>On Jan 25, 2017, at 5:46 PM, Patternpilot One via NSRCA-discussion <<a href="mailto:nsrca-discussion@lists.nsrca.org">nsrca-discussion@lists.nsrca.org</a>> wrote:<o:p></o:p></span></p></div><blockquote style='margin-top:5.0pt;margin-bottom:5.0pt'><div><div><p><span style='color:black'>I see the potential for more people to fly pattern without the weight limit.<o:p></o:p></span></p></div><div><p><span style='color:black'> <o:p></o:p></span></p></div><div><p><span style='color:black'>Sa.<o:p></o:p></span></p></div><div><p><span style='color:black'> <o:p></o:p></span></p></div><div><p><span style='color:black'> <o:p></o:p></span></p></div><div><p><span style='color:black'> <o:p></o:p></span></p></div><div id="composer_signature"><div><p><span style='font-size:10.5pt;color:#364F67'>Sent from my Verizon 4G LTE smartphone</span><span style='color:black'><o:p></o:p></span></p></div></div><p><span style='color:black'><br><br>-------- Original message --------<br>From: Larry Diamond via NSRCA-discussion <<a href="mailto:nsrca-discussion@lists.nsrca.org">nsrca-discussion@lists.nsrca.org</a>> <br>Date: 1/25/17 5:34 PM (GMT-05:00) <br>To: Whodaddy Whodaddy <<a href="mailto:whodaddy10@gmail.com">whodaddy10@gmail.com</a>>, General pattern discussion <<a href="mailto:nsrca-discussion@lists.nsrca.org">nsrca-discussion@lists.nsrca.org</a>> <br>Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Rules Proposal Cycle? <o:p></o:p></span></p><div><div><p><span style='color:black'>Hmmmm. No weight limit...<o:p></o:p></span></p></div><div><p><span style='color:black'> <o:p></o:p></span></p></div><div><p><span style='color:black'>I see a new market for a full 2M wing span on bi-planes sporting a YS-300DZ twin on the horizon... vbg<o:p></o:p></span></p></div><div><p><span style='color:black'> <o:p></o:p></span></p></div><div><p><span style='color:black'> <o:p></o:p></span></p></div><div><p><span style='color:black'> <o:p></o:p></span></p></div><div id="composer_signature"><div><p><span style='font-size:10.0pt;color:#575757'>Sent via the Samsung Galaxy S® 6, an AT&T 4G LTE smartphone</span><span style='color:black'><o:p></o:p></span></p></div></div><div><p><span style='color:black'> <o:p></o:p></span></p></div><div><div><p><span style='color:black'>-------- Original message --------<o:p></o:p></span></p></div><div><p><span style='color:black'>From: Whodaddy Whodaddy via NSRCA-discussion <<a href="mailto:nsrca-discussion@lists.nsrca.org">nsrca-discussion@lists.nsrca.org</a>> <o:p></o:p></span></p></div><div><p><span style='color:black'>Date: 1/25/17 4:20 PM (GMT-06:00) <o:p></o:p></span></p></div><div><p><span style='color:black'>To: Jas S <<a href="mailto:justanotherflyr@gmail.com">justanotherflyr@gmail.com</a>>, General pattern discussion <<a href="mailto:nsrca-discussion@lists.nsrca.org">nsrca-discussion@lists.nsrca.org</a>> <o:p></o:p></span></p></div><div><p><span style='color:black'>Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Rules Proposal Cycle? <o:p></o:p></span></p></div><div><p><span style='color:black'> <o:p></o:p></span></p></div></div><div><p><span style='color:black'>Not a fan of rule change for weight .. Cost is an obsolete argument blah blah blah ... Im well under with no extravagant $$$ or measures ... If manufacturers are building heavy components for their planes and that plane is overweight then dont buy the dang thing .. There is enough information as to the dews and donts to get planes under weight and wat planes leave the factory as over weight pigs... .. I you dont pay attention its ur fault u fly a pig ... Dont change the rules cause u refuse to pay attention ... <o:p></o:p></span></p></div><div id=AppleMailSignature><p><span style='color:black'> <o:p></o:p></span></p></div><div id=AppleMailSignature><p><span style='color:black'>Nuff said<o:p></o:p></span></p></div><div id=AppleMailSignature><p><span style='color:black'> <o:p></o:p></span></p></div><div id=AppleMailSignature><p><span style='color:black'>G<br><br>Sent from my iPhone<o:p></o:p></span></p></div><div><p><span style='color:black'><br>On Jan 25, 2017, at 12:20 PM, Jas S via NSRCA-discussion <<a href="mailto:nsrca-discussion@lists.nsrca.org">nsrca-discussion@lists.nsrca.org</a>> wrote:<o:p></o:p></span></p></div><blockquote style='margin-top:5.0pt;margin-bottom:5.0pt'><div><div><p><span style='color:black'>There is one. The pilot with an 'over weight' can now compete at the Nats<br><br>Jas iP<o:p></o:p></span></p></div><div><p><span style='color:black'><br>On Jan 25, 2017, at 1:20 PM, Ronald Van Putte via NSRCA-discussion <<a href="mailto:nsrca-discussion@lists.nsrca.org">nsrca-discussion@lists.nsrca.org</a>> wrote:<o:p></o:p></span></p></div><blockquote style='margin-top:5.0pt;margin-bottom:5.0pt'><div><p><span style='color:black'>Come on now! How can hobby shops make some $$$ on a customer who needs to “buy some lightness” if the weight limit is thrown in the trash? <o:p></o:p></span></p><div><p><span style='color:black'> <o:p></o:p></span></p></div><div><p><span style='color:black'>I hope that all readers realize that my tongue was firmly in my cheek when I posted the above. There is no advantage in R/C aerobatic competition for a pilot to fly a heavy airplane.<o:p></o:p></span></p></div><div><p><span style='color:black'> <o:p></o:p></span></p></div><div><p><span style='color:black'>Ron Van Putte<o:p></o:p></span></p></div><div><p><span style='color:black'> <o:p></o:p></span></p><div><blockquote style='margin-top:5.0pt;margin-bottom:5.0pt'><div><p><span style='color:black'>On Jan 25, 2017, at 10:58 AM, Keith Hoard via NSRCA-discussion <<a href="mailto:nsrca-discussion@lists.nsrca.org">nsrca-discussion@lists.nsrca.org</a>> wrote:<o:p></o:p></span></p></div><p><span style='color:black'> <o:p></o:p></span></p><div><div><div><p><span style='font-size:14.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;color:#1F497D'>I think its time to throw the weight limit in the trash. There is nothing keeping anyone from voluntarily spending half of a paycheck to drop a few grams.</span><span style='color:black'><o:p></o:p></span></p></div><div><p><span style='font-size:14.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;color:#1F497D'> </span><span style='color:black'><o:p></o:p></span></p></div><div><div style='border:none;border-top:solid windowtext 1.0pt;padding:3.0pt 0in 0in 0in;border-color:currentColor currentColor;border-image: none'><div><p><b><span style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;color:black'>From:</span></b><span style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;color:black'> NSRCA-discussion [<a href="mailto:nsrca-discussion-bounces@lists.nsrca.org"><span style='color:#954F72'>mailto:nsrca-discussion-bounces@lists.nsrca.org</span></a>] <b>On Behalf Of </b>blotch44026--- via NSRCA-discussion<br><b>Sent:</b> Wednesday, January 25, 2017 10:56<br><b>To:</b> Joe Lachowski <<a href="mailto:jlachow@hotmail.com"><span style='color:#954F72'>jlachow@hotmail.com</span></a>>; General pattern discussion <<a href="mailto:nsrca-discussion@lists.nsrca.org"><span style='color:#954F72'>nsrca-discussion@lists.nsrca.org</span></a>>; General pattern discussion <<a href="mailto:nsrca-discussion@lists.nsrca.org"><span style='color:#954F72'>nsrca-discussion@lists.nsrca.org</span></a>><br><b>Subject:</b> Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Rules Proposal Cycle?</span><span style='color:black'><o:p></o:p></span></p></div></div></div><div><p><span style='color:black'> <o:p></o:p></span></p></div><div><p><span style='font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Arial",sans-serif;color:black'>+1</span><span style='color:black'><o:p></o:p></span></p><blockquote style='border:none;border-left:solid windowtext 1.5pt;padding:0in 0in 0in 4.0pt;margin-left:0in;margin-top:5.0pt;margin-bottom:5.0pt;border-color:currentColor currentColor currentColor blue;border-image: none'><div><p><span style='font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Arial",sans-serif;color:black'>-----Original Message----- <br>From: Joe Lachowski via NSRCA-discussion <br>Sent: Jan 24, 2017 5:04 PM <br>To: General pattern discussion <br>Subject: [NSRCA-discussion] Rules Proposal Cycle? </span><span style='color:black'><o:p></o:p></span></p></div><div id=divtagdefaultwrapper><p><span style='font-size:10.5pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;color:black'>Does anyone know when the next rules proposal cycle begins?</span><span style='color:black'><o:p></o:p></span></p><p><span style='font-size:10.5pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;color:black'> </span><span style='color:black'><o:p></o:p></span></p><p><span style='font-size:10.5pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;color:black'>I think it is time to stretch the weight limit to at least 4 ozs over 11 lbs. for electrics in ALL the AMA classes. Tired of paying the proverbial $100 and ounce to get there. Glow setups have an advantage. No doubt in my mind.</span><span style='color:black'><o:p></o:p></span></p><p><span style='font-size:10.5pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;color:black'> </span><span style='color:black'><o:p></o:p></span></p><p><span style='font-size:10.5pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;color:black'>Flame on.</span><span style='color:black'><o:p></o:p></span></p></div></blockquote></div></div><p><span style='font-size:10.5pt;color:black'>_______________________________________________<br>NSRCA-discussion mailing list<br></span><span style='color:black'><a href="mailto:NSRCA-discussion@lists.nsrca.org"><span style='font-size:10.5pt;color:#954F72'>NSRCA-discussion@lists.nsrca.org</span></a></span><span style='font-size:10.5pt;color:black'><br></span><span style='color:black'><a href="http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion"><span style='font-size:10.5pt;color:#954F72'>http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion</span></a><o:p></o:p></span></p></div></blockquote></div><p><span style='color:black'> <o:p></o:p></span></p></div></div></blockquote><blockquote style='margin-top:5.0pt;margin-bottom:5.0pt'><div><p><span style='color:black'>_______________________________________________<br>NSRCA-discussion mailing list<br><a href="mailto:NSRCA-discussion@lists.nsrca.org">NSRCA-discussion@lists.nsrca.org</a><br><a href="http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion">http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion</a><o:p></o:p></span></p></div></blockquote></div></blockquote><blockquote style='margin-top:5.0pt;margin-bottom:5.0pt'><div><p><span style='color:black'>_______________________________________________<br>NSRCA-discussion mailing list<br><a href="mailto:NSRCA-discussion@lists.nsrca.org">NSRCA-discussion@lists.nsrca.org</a><br><a href="http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion">http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion</a><o:p></o:p></span></p></div></blockquote></div></div></blockquote><blockquote style='margin-top:5.0pt;margin-bottom:5.0pt'><div><p><span style='color:black'>_______________________________________________<br>NSRCA-discussion mailing list<br><a href="mailto:NSRCA-discussion@lists.nsrca.org">NSRCA-discussion@lists.nsrca.org</a><br><a href="http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion">http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion</a><o:p></o:p></span></p></div></blockquote></div></div></div></div></div></body></html>