<div dir="ltr">So this applies to all F3 classes (F3A, F3P, F3S, Advanced)?<div><br></div><div>What was the reasoning for rounding up? </div></div><div class="gmail_extra"><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Sun, Jan 3, 2016 at 3:47 PM, John Gayer via NSRCA-discussion <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:nsrca-discussion@lists.nsrca.org" target="_blank">nsrca-discussion@lists.nsrca.org</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
<div text="#3333FF" bgcolor="#FFFFFF">
Not making a lot of sense. If the judge is required to operate in
1/2 point deductions, why can't the scoring program? I see no point
in the judge needing to round to full points either up or down.<br>
Of course, after considering positioning, size, smoothness and
grace, distance out, etc you will be unlikely to round UP.....<br>
<br>
John<div><div class="h5"><br>
<br>
<br>
<div>On 1/3/2016 1:35 PM, Verne Koester via
NSRCA-discussion wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote type="cite">
<div>It's a complete 180 from before. Until now, a judge was
required to round down. Now we have to round up or let the
scoring computer do it. Still inferior in accuracy compared to
ama scoring in my opinion. </div>
<div>Verne<br>
<br>
Sent from my iPhone</div>
<div><br>
On Jan 3, 2016, at 2:23 PM, Ed Alt via NSRCA-discussion <<a href="mailto:nsrca-discussion@lists.nsrca.org" target="_blank"></a><a href="mailto:nsrca-discussion@lists.nsrca.org" target="_blank">nsrca-discussion@lists.nsrca.org</a>>
wrote:<br>
<br>
</div>
<blockquote type="cite">
<div>
<div>It also means that just one minor infraction doesn't
count at all. It only counts when a 2nd minor infraction is
observed. The logic of that escapes me. </div>
<div><br>
On Jan 3, 2016, at 2:20 PM, Scott McHarg <<a href="mailto:scmcharg@gmail.com" target="_blank"></a><a href="mailto:scmcharg@gmail.com" target="_blank">scmcharg@gmail.com</a>>
wrote:<br>
<br>
</div>
<blockquote type="cite">
<div>The purpose is now a minor infraction isn't the same
value as a major. You can have two minors for the same
price as a major. It allows the judges to be more accurate
in their tabulation even if it is rounded up. <span></span><br>
<br>
On Sunday, January 3, 2016, Ed Alt via NSRCA-discussion
<<a href="mailto:nsrca-discussion@lists.nsrca.org" target="_blank">nsrca-discussion@lists.nsrca.org</a>>
wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">So the
first minor error observed is a freebie. What is the
purpose of that?<br>
<br>
> On Jan 3, 2016, at 2:07 PM, Derek Koopowitz via
NSRCA-discussion <<a>nsrca-discussion@lists.nsrca.org</a>>
wrote:<br>
><br>
> Some said it would never happen… well it did happen
at the December CIAM meeting. 1/2 points are now
effective in F3 aerobatics. A special rule provision
was made and voted on at the Bureau meeting and the
following will become effective this year. What this
means is that for minor errors a 1/2 point deduction is
given instead of the “traditional” 1 point deduction.
At the end of the maneuver, if the resulting score is a
6.5, the final score will be rounded up to 7. The judge
can do this automatically or can right down the 6.5 and
the scoring program will round the number up.<br>
><br>
> Questions?<br>
><br>
> <86EC7BC7-B7ED-4241-B993-95EC9BCD7026.png><br>
><br>
><br>
> <86EC7BC7-B7ED-4241-B993-95EC9BCD7026.png><br>
> _______________________________________________<br>
> NSRCA-discussion mailing list<br>
> <a>NSRCA-discussion@lists.nsrca.org</a><br>
> <a href="http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion" target="_blank">http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion</a><br>
_______________________________________________<br>
NSRCA-discussion mailing list<br>
<a>NSRCA-discussion@lists.nsrca.org</a><br>
<a href="http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion" target="_blank">http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion</a></blockquote>
<br>
<br>
-- <br>
<div dir="ltr">
<div>
<div dir="ltr"><b style="color:rgb(51,51,255)"><font style="font-family:comic sans ms,sans-serif" size="4">Scott A. McHarg</font></b><br>
<div>VSCL / CANVASS U.A.S. Research Pilot</div>
<div>Texas A&M University</div>
<div>PPL - ASEL</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<br>
</div>
</blockquote>
</div>
</blockquote>
<blockquote type="cite">
<div><span>_______________________________________________</span><br>
<span>NSRCA-discussion mailing list</span><br>
<span><a href="mailto:NSRCA-discussion@lists.nsrca.org" target="_blank">NSRCA-discussion@lists.nsrca.org</a></span><br>
<span><a href="http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion" target="_blank">http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion</a></span></div>
</blockquote>
<br>
<fieldset></fieldset>
<br>
<pre>_______________________________________________
NSRCA-discussion mailing list
<a href="mailto:NSRCA-discussion@lists.nsrca.org" target="_blank">NSRCA-discussion@lists.nsrca.org</a>
<a href="http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion" target="_blank">http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion</a></pre>
</blockquote>
<br>
</div></div></div>
<br>_______________________________________________<br>
NSRCA-discussion mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:NSRCA-discussion@lists.nsrca.org">NSRCA-discussion@lists.nsrca.org</a><br>
<a href="http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion</a><br></blockquote></div><br></div>