<div dir="ltr">Facts:<div><br></div><div>1. Drones are a real safety concern and the general public is beginning to understand this.</div><div>2. The FAA is responsible for regulating safety of air travel, manned or unmanned.</div><div>3. The public will be on the FAA's side and will expect them to get this under control.</div><div>4. RC clubs are not the problem, but the subtleties in describing what makes us different is too nuanced for general understanding</div><div>5. From the FAA's standpoint there is no upside to complicate the system by requiring registration for only a specific class of RC pilots (non-club drone pilots).</div><div>6. Most drone pilots causing trouble will not register, but that should not stop the FAA from trying to control the problem.</div><div><br></div><div>No matter how much everyone carries on here I don't think there is any way the registration requirement will be overturned. With the proliferation of off-the-shelf drones it actually makes sense and personally I wish people were required to register with AMA or FAA before buying drones. I've been concerned about random yahoos with no prior RC experience or club affiliation purchasing and fly these devices wherever they feel like. Non-RC guys, even so called professionals, simply don't understand the dangers involved (flying over people, highways, etc.) I've been to numerous events where there is a drone flying right above a crowd.</div><div><br></div><div>I too am very concerned about what this means for our hobby, but as autonomous flight technologies grow it has to be controlled to protect the public.</div><div><br></div><div>Keith Black <br></div><div><br></div><div><br></div></div><div class="gmail_extra"><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Tue, Dec 22, 2015 at 1:48 PM, John Gayer via NSRCA-discussion <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:nsrca-discussion@lists.nsrca.org" target="_blank">nsrca-discussion@lists.nsrca.org</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
<div bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#3333FF">
Surely the AMA has already done this! There must have been a lot of
papers and correspondence between the FAA and the AMA covering many
of these points that we haven't seen and that have been ignored by
the FAA. <br>
<br>
The biggest problem I see is very basic-<br>
<br>
Lack of definition of UAV types at the FAA. They use all
possibilities interchangeably and throw a large blanket over them
all.<div><div class="h5"><br>
<br>
<br>
<div>On 12/22/2015 11:57 AM, Scott McHarg
wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote type="cite">
<div dir="ltr">
<div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:georgia,serif;color:rgb(0,0,255)">The
thought I wrote Dec. 16th:</div>
<div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:georgia,serif;color:rgb(0,0,255)"><br>
</div>
<div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:georgia,serif">
<div class="gmail_default" style="font-size:12.8px"><font color="#ff0000">I think that maybe we, as an organization,
could come up with a "paper" to present to the AMA or the
FAA if we so choose to point out some very obvious facts:</font></div>
<div class="gmail_default" style="font-size:12.8px"><font color="#ff0000"><br>
</font></div>
<div class="gmail_default" style="font-size:12.8px"><font color="#ff0000">A. The registration process will not work
in the manner expected because those who are doing illegal
actions with drones will simply not register as there is
zero way to find that out without inspecting by an agency
that would have to have the manpower to do it.</font></div>
<div class="gmail_default" style="font-size:12.8px"><font color="#ff0000">B. By registering only the operator, a
person knowingly flying where they shouldn't be will
simply take out the registration information when
performing illegal activities.</font></div>
<div class="gmail_default" style="font-size:12.8px"><font color="#ff0000">C.</font></div>
<div class="gmail_default" style="font-size:12.8px"><font color="#ff0000">D.</font></div>
<div class="gmail_default" style="font-size:12.8px"><font color="#ff0000">and so on.</font></div>
<div class="gmail_default" style="font-size:12.8px"><font color="#ff0000"><br>
</font></div>
<div class="gmail_default" style="font-size:12.8px"><font color="#ff0000">Just a thought on how to try to work with
the system. I understand why they're doing it but I don't
think for one second that this will change the problem
children in the least, especially those who don't know.
Like many have said, the problem is those that are
uneducated about etiquette with these models. Before
online purchasing became so big (and to the detriment of
local hobby shops), people would go to these local hobby
shops and be directed to the local AMA field where folks
began to understand how this all worked. Now, they just
purchase these things online. Due to advancing
technology, you no longer have to know how to be a pilot,
you simply program in the waypoints and sit back and
watch. With today's gyro's, the aircraft is always
stable. </font></div>
<div class="gmail_default" style="font-size:12.8px"><font color="#ff0000"><br>
</font></div>
<div class="gmail_default" style="font-size:12.8px"><font color="#ff0000">The FAA needs to be educated on the how's
and why's as well as the operator in today's society.</font></div>
<div class="gmail_default" style="font-size:12.8px"><font color="#ff0000"><br>
</font></div>
<div class="gmail_default" style="font-size:12.8px"><font color="#0000ff">It's not really about the numbers. We all
have plenty of numbers in our life. The physical number
doesn't matter and isn't what people are upset about.
It's about that number being used by people who do bad
things and about being regulated by another agency that
doesn't really understand who or what we, as modelers, are
and do. This rule has been instituted because of people
flying where they're not supposed to whether it be lack of
education or the simple fact they don't care because
there's little chance of them getting caught. Police
officers will be using this and citing parts of laws in
order to give citations and make arrests but the simple
fact is they're not going to be sitting at AMA fields.
They're going to be in parks, in downtown areas, by
airports, etc. Those are the people they're after and we
are just caught in the middle which stinks. We have a
right to be upset that we're caught up but we need to find
a way to deal with this and be positive and certainly
pro-active as Jim suggested. Refusing to click "I accept"
gets you nowhere other than in trouble and fined or out of
the hobby. For me, neither of those are acceptable.</font></div>
</div>
</div>
<div class="gmail_extra"><br clear="all">
<div>
<div>
<div dir="ltr">
<div>
<div dir="ltr"><b style="color:rgb(51,51,255)"><font style="font-family:comic sans ms,sans-serif" size="4">Scott A. McHarg</font></b><br>
<div>VSCL / CANVASS U.A.S. Research Pilot</div>
<div>Texas A&M University</div>
<div>PPL - ASEL</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<br>
<div class="gmail_quote">On Tue, Dec 22, 2015 at 12:45 PM, John
Gayer <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:jgghome@comcast.net" target="_blank">jgghome@comcast.net</a>></span>
wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
<div bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#3333FF"> What thought are you
referring to?<br>
<br>
The AMA won't win their argument about numbers. The AMA
could propose a compromise that FAA provide a block of
numbers and that the AMA drop their own numbering system
and convert to those numbers. <br>
Unless the AMA can get model aircraft excluded from
registration. I did propose a different set of UAV
categories way back in this thread. It's obvious from
their publications that the FAA lacks any coherent
definitions.<br>
<br>
<div>On 12/21/2015 1:27 PM, Scott McHarg wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote type="cite">I find it really interesting that
a lot of us have no problem complaining but when a
thought about putting together a logical, well-founded
paper written to either the AMA or the FAA is presented,
no one comments.</blockquote>
<br>
</div>
</blockquote>
</div>
<br>
</div>
</blockquote>
<br>
</div></div></div>
<br>_______________________________________________<br>
NSRCA-discussion mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:NSRCA-discussion@lists.nsrca.org">NSRCA-discussion@lists.nsrca.org</a><br>
<a href="http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion</a><br></blockquote></div><br></div>