<html><head><meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html charset=us-ascii"></head><body style="word-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; -webkit-line-break: after-white-space;" class="">The Sequence Development Guidelines specify at least 2 (no more than 3) cross box maneuvers for Masters. Traditionally at least one of these (sometimes 2) are forced cross box and we leave one optional. I think you will see this in most all recent Masters sequences?<div class=""><br class=""></div><div class="">Dale</div><div class=""><br class=""></div><div class=""><br class=""><div><blockquote type="cite" class=""><div class="">On Sep 4, 2015, at 10:52 AM, john tarpinian <<a href="mailto:jtarpinian@yahoo.com" class="">jtarpinian@yahoo.com</a>> wrote:</div><br class="Apple-interchange-newline"><div class=""><div class=""><div style="background-color: rgb(255, 255, 255); font-family: HelveticaNeue, 'Helvetica Neue', Helvetica, Arial, 'Lucida Grande', sans-serif; font-size: 16px;" class=""><div id="yui_3_16_0_1_1441388453194_2832" dir="ltr" class=""><span id="yui_3_16_0_1_1441388453194_2907" class="">I don't understand the reasoning behind a forced cross box maneuver. If you're 150m out it forces you out to 175m and beyond or come in and get squeezed. It sort of penalizes you for holding the 150m line.</span></div><div id="yui_3_16_0_1_1441388453194_2832" dir="ltr" class=""><span class=""><br class=""></span></div><div id="yui_3_16_0_1_1441388453194_2832" dir="ltr" class=""><span class="">John</span></div> <br class=""><div class="qtdSeparateBR"><br class=""><br class=""></div><div class="yahoo_quoted" style="display: block;"> <div style="font-family: HelveticaNeue, Helvetica Neue, Helvetica, Arial, Lucida Grande, sans-serif; font-size: 16px;" class=""> <div style="font-family: HelveticaNeue, Helvetica Neue, Helvetica, Arial, Lucida Grande, sans-serif; font-size: 16px;" class=""> <div dir="ltr" class=""> <font size="2" face="Arial" class=""> On Friday, September 4, 2015 12:35 PM, Dale Olstinske via NSRCA-discussion <<a href="mailto:nsrca-discussion@lists.nsrca.org" class="">nsrca-discussion@lists.nsrca.org</a>> wrote:<br class=""> </font> </div> <br class=""><br class=""> <div class="y_msg_container">The Sequence Committee considered all input from the membership recieved since we sent out our recommendation last spring. We have decided to leave Advanced proposal as is, but made some changes to Masters. Both are posted to the web site. The Masters changes are as follows all based on membership input:<br class=""><br class="">1. The two down wind stall turns #9 and #13 were very similar in design. We modified the second one (#13), to a Stall Turn with a 3/4 roll, 1/4 roll down.<br class="">2. The Top Hat turnaround, #15 had an inline option which was not practical. Since we did not have any forced cross box turnaround (only optional) we decided to make to eliminate the in line option. It is now a Top Hat with 3 of 4 up, 1/4 roll down.<br class="">3. We have dropped the requirement for immediate roll reversal. All roll reversals may have a pause, BUT it is not required. Anyone wishing to do immediate reversal, like FAI, may do so. This has been in our sequence descriptions for the past few years, so no change.<br class=""><br class="">The BOD will be voting on these sequences next week. If approved, we will soon create the Aresti and Power Point for both of these.<br class=""><br class=""><br class="">Thanks,<br class=""><br class="">Dale<br class=""><br class=""><br class=""><br class="">_______________________________________________<br class="">NSRCA-discussion mailing list<br class=""><a ymailto="mailto:NSRCA-discussion@lists.nsrca.org" href="mailto:NSRCA-discussion@lists.nsrca.org" class="">NSRCA-discussion@lists.nsrca.org</a><br class=""><a href="http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion" target="_blank" class="">http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion</a><br class=""><br class=""><br class=""></div> </div> </div> </div></div></div></div></blockquote></div><br class=""></div></body></html>