<html>
  <head>
    <meta content="text/html; charset=utf-8" http-equiv="Content-Type">
  </head>
  <body bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#3333FF">
    Yeah Keith, I read that.<br>
    <br>
    What is missing from the article is the number of satellites
    required to achieve that accuracy and what percentage of the time
    that minimum configuration exists. Some of the problems they have
    would be diminished in our openair environment(multipath, for
    example). They don't mention the update rate although the video
    seems to indicate it is pretty good. <br>
    <br>
    Of course, most of the software could be developed now with the
    existing sensor technology. If the sensor technology isn't good
    enough, just wait six months for the virtual reality guys to drive
    it forward since they need a high update rate as well.<br>
    Start with the coaching analysis software which is relatively easy.<br>
    For auto-judging I still see the need for one judge to be a zero
    judge and score points on stall turns, snaps and spins. Perhaps also
    to mark the termination of each maneuver. The software involved is
    fairly complex as the maneuver size and centering are undefined
    until the maneuver is complete and in absolute terms the downgrade
    criteria are totally inadequate.<br>
    <br>
    John<br>
    <br>
    <div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 5/9/2015 12:39 PM, Keith Hoard
      wrote:<br>
    </div>
    <blockquote
      cite="mid:BAY403-EAS311231A56FF9604AE3DABD8B8DD0@phx.gbl"
      type="cite">
      <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8">
      <div>
        <div style="font-family: Calibri,sans-serif; font-size: 11pt;">If
          you follow the link, some egg-heads have "broken the code" for
          centimeter accuracy GPS using existing cheap antennas using
          software only.
          <br>
          <br>
          -Keith Hoard<br>
          -Sent from my Windows Phone</div>
      </div>
      <div dir="ltr">
        <hr>
        <span style="font-family: Calibri,sans-serif; font-size: 11pt;
          font-weight: bold;">From:
        </span><span style="font-family: Calibri,sans-serif; font-size:
          11pt;"><a moz-do-not-send="true"
            href="mailto:nsrca-discussion@lists.nsrca.org">John Gayer
            via NSRCA-discussion</a></span><br>
        <span style="font-family: Calibri,sans-serif; font-size: 11pt;
          font-weight: bold;">Sent:
        </span><span style="font-family: Calibri,sans-serif; font-size:
          11pt;">‎5/‎9/‎2015 12:47</span><br>
        <span style="font-family: Calibri,sans-serif; font-size: 11pt;
          font-weight: bold;">To:
        </span><span style="font-family: Calibri,sans-serif; font-size:
          11pt;"><a moz-do-not-send="true"
            href="mailto:underdw@gmail.com">Daniel Underkofler</a>;
          <a moz-do-not-send="true"
            href="mailto:nsrca-discussion@lists.nsrca.org">General
            pattern discussion</a></span><br>
        <span style="font-family: Calibri,sans-serif; font-size: 11pt;
          font-weight: bold;">Subject:
        </span><span style="font-family: Calibri,sans-serif; font-size:
          11pt;">Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Could this allow automated
          scoring?</span><br>
        <br>
      </div>
      <div style="background-color:#FFFFFF">Ground based GPS
        augmentation systems exist and have been tested. However, I
        haven't heard about anything in our price range. Typically in an
        airport environment, the ground based transmitter is
        broadcasting corrections to the satellite signals rather than an
        imitation satellite signal.<br>
        Standard micro GPS probably wouldn't know what to do with this
        signal. Also the ground-based xmitter is not sized/priced for
        us.
        <br>
        However , it may not be necessary to go that route. If we could
        improve on the 3 meter accuracy a bit and the 10hz update rate
        and expand the storage capacity....<br>
        <br>
        But rather than auto-judging, setting up a display showing the
        plan view and vertical view graphically, perhaps with color
        shading to indicate deviation from roll angle = 0 in realtime
        would be an incredible advance in practice/coaching.  Think
        about it.<br>
        In a square on corner, you would see directly the effect of the
        top corner roll attitude being off 5 degrees and where that took
        the third leg.
        <br>
        <br>
        John<br>
        <br>
        <div class="x_moz-cite-prefix">On 5/9/2015 7:07 AM, Daniel
          Underkofler via NSRCA-discussion wrote:<br>
        </div>
        <blockquote type="cite">
          <div dir="ltr">It's great to see technology like this
            approaching for at least partial automated judging.
            <div><br>
            </div>
            <div>
              <div>Seems that resolving the altitude component
                adequately is the largest challenge.  To address this, I
                had envisioned a local set of 3 "beacons", each emitting
                GPS-like signals that are received and processed by a
                transponder in the model.  Yeah - expensive and even
                more out in the future.</div>
              <div><br>
              </div>
              <div>In the short term, using high resolution and update
                GPS to resolve XY location might be useful for partial
                judging.  Human judges would still be responsible for
                the majority of the scoring, but a "correction factor"
                for XY errors might be factored in.  For instance, it is
                terribly hard to judge the geometry of the horizontal
                triangle in F15, but given good XY data, a portion of
                the score could be addressed.  Distance and  parallelism
                to the runway could also be determined and factored in
                (somehow).</div>
              <div><br>
              </div>
              <div>Dan</div>
            </div>
          </div>
          <div class="x_gmail_extra"><br>
            <div class="x_gmail_quote">On Fri, May 8, 2015 at 9:33 PM,
              John Gayer via NSRCA-discussion
              <span dir="ltr"><<a moz-do-not-send="true"
                  href="mailto:nsrca-discussion@lists.nsrca.org"
                  target="_blank">nsrca-discussion@lists.nsrca.org</a>></span>
              wrote:<br>
              <blockquote class="x_gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0
                .8ex; border-left:1px #ccc solid; padding-left:1ex">
                <div bgcolor="#FFFFFF">The judges are expected to
                  consider the track of the plane in an earth coordinate
                  system. For example the judges are supposed to
                  consider that a 45 degree climb appears steeper at the
                  end of the box than it does in the center. So the
                  track should be analyzed by the judges in an earth
                  coordinate system and the track of the model rather
                  than attitude.
                  <br>
                  <br>
                  The location of the pilot is actually irrelevant but
                  the location of the box is clearly of critical
                  importance. Knowing the actual location of the plane
                  with a fairly quick update rate is critical. At 120
                  feet/sec(approx 80 mph), horizontal position is no
                  problem. At this speed you need an update rate of
                  about 80 milliseconds to get a data point about every
                  10 feet. Not sure how good the GPS update rates are
                  these days but this should be achievable. IF the
                  altitude update rate is too slow then augment with an
                  altimeter. Since we are downloading this data from the
                  model, roll attitude could be transmitted as well for
                  wings level.<br>
                  <br>
                  We would still need a zero judge for snaps, spins and
                  stall turns and to establish when the pilot is lost in
                  a maneuver. It might be necessary to have an "advance
                  to the next maneuver" switch for that case.<br>
                  <br>
                  It would actually be a fascinating project to download
                  accelerations, roll, yaw and pitch rates for analysis
                  while observing snaps visually to see if standards
                  could be established about what is a snap and what
                  isn't.<br>
                  <br>
                  John<br>
                  <br>
                  <div>On 5/8/2015 1:24 PM, Peter Vogel via
                    NSRCA-discussion wrote:<br>
                  </div>
                  <blockquote type="cite">
                    <div dir="ltr">Not by itself.  Judging/Scoring is
                      from the perspective of the pilot + judges, not
                      from the perspective of the plane.  (As opposed to
                      IAC, where it's from the perspective of the pilot
                      in the plane).  For it to be done right you'd need
                      to know the precise location of the plane and the
                      precise location of the pilot, then calculate the
                      geometry of the plane's movements relative to the
                      perspective of the pilot's location.  
                      <div><br>
                      </div>
                      <div>The SoloShot 2 automatic cameraman does close
                        to what we want in tracking the movement of the
                        plane relative to a ground station, but from
                        that you'd still need to calculate geometries,
                        and wings level, etc.</div>
                      <div><br>
                      </div>
                      <div>Peter+</div>
                    </div>
                    <div class="x_gmail_extra"><br>
                      <div class="x_gmail_quote">On Fri, May 8, 2015 at
                        11:44 AM, Keith Hoard via NSRCA-discussion
                        <span dir="ltr"><<a moz-do-not-send="true"
                            href="mailto:nsrca-discussion@lists.nsrca.org"
                            target="_blank">nsrca-discussion@lists.nsrca.org</a>></span>
                        wrote:<br>
                        <blockquote class="x_gmail_quote"
                          style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex; border-left:1px #ccc
                          solid; padding-left:1ex">
                          <div lang="EN-US">
                            <div>
                              <p class="x_MsoNormal"><span
                                  style="font-size:14.0pt">Cheap, <a
                                    moz-do-not-send="true"
                                    href="http://goo.gl/mZg6RG"
                                    target="_blank">
                                    Centimeter accuracy GPS</a>.</span></p>
                              <p class="x_MsoNormal"><span
                                  style="font-size:14.0pt"> </span></p>
                              <p class="x_MsoNormal"><span
                                  style="font-size:14.0pt">No more
                                  complaints about biased judging?</span></p>
                              <p class="x_MsoNormal"><span
                                  style="font-size:14.0pt"> </span></p>
                              <p class="x_MsoNormal"><span
                                  style="font-size:14.0pt">-Keith Hoard</span></p>
                              <p class="x_MsoNormal"><span
                                  style="font-size:14.0pt"><a
                                    moz-do-not-send="true"
                                    href="mailto:klhoard@hotmail.com"
                                    target="_blank">klhoard@hotmail.com</a></span></p>
                              <p class="x_MsoNormal"> </p>
                            </div>
                          </div>
                          <br>
_______________________________________________<br>
                          NSRCA-discussion mailing list<br>
                          <a moz-do-not-send="true"
                            href="mailto:NSRCA-discussion@lists.nsrca.org"
                            target="_blank">NSRCA-discussion@lists.nsrca.org</a><br>
                          <a moz-do-not-send="true"
                            href="http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion"
                            target="_blank">http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion</a><br>
                        </blockquote>
                      </div>
                      <br>
                      <br clear="all">
                      <span class="x_HOEnZb"><font color="#888888">
                          <div><br>
                          </div>
                          -- <br>
                          <div>
                            <div dir="ltr">
                              <div>Director, Fixed Wing Flight Training</div>
                              <div>Santa Clara County Model Aircraft
                                Skypark</div>
                              <div>Associate Vice President, Academy of
                                Model Aeronautics District X</div>
                              <img moz-do-not-send="true"
                                src="http://farm8.staticflickr.com/7163/6513778381_5569cc985d_m.jpg"
                                height="154" width="200"><img
                                moz-do-not-send="true"
src="https://googledrive.com/host/0B4LOPeyGAgOJUVJmU1dJMVl6WWc/AcademyModelAeronauticsLogo.png"
                                height="136" width="200"><br>
                            </div>
                          </div>
                        </font></span></div>
                    <span class="x_HOEnZb"><font color="#888888"><br>
                        <fieldset></fieldset>
                        <br>
                        <pre>_______________________________________________
NSRCA-discussion mailing list
<a moz-do-not-send="true" href="mailto:NSRCA-discussion@lists.nsrca.org" target="_blank">NSRCA-discussion@lists.nsrca.org</a>
<a moz-do-not-send="true" href="http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion" target="_blank">http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion</a></pre>
                      </font></span></blockquote>
                  <br>
                </div>
                <br>
                _______________________________________________<br>
                NSRCA-discussion mailing list<br>
                <a moz-do-not-send="true"
                  href="mailto:NSRCA-discussion@lists.nsrca.org">NSRCA-discussion@lists.nsrca.org</a><br>
                <a moz-do-not-send="true"
                  href="http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion"
                  target="_blank">http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion</a><br>
              </blockquote>
            </div>
            <br>
          </div>
          <br>
          <fieldset class="x_mimeAttachmentHeader"></fieldset>
          <br>
          <pre>_______________________________________________
NSRCA-discussion mailing list
<a moz-do-not-send="true" class="x_moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:NSRCA-discussion@lists.nsrca.org">NSRCA-discussion@lists.nsrca.org</a>
<a moz-do-not-send="true" class="x_moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion">http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion</a></pre>
        </blockquote>
        <br>
      </div>
    </blockquote>
    <br>
  </body>
</html>