<html xmlns:v="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:vml" xmlns:o="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office" xmlns:w="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:word" xmlns:m="http://schemas.microsoft.com/office/2004/12/omml" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-html40"><head><meta http-equiv=Content-Type content="text/html; charset=us-ascii"><meta name=Generator content="Microsoft Word 14 (filtered medium)"><base href="x-msg://721/"><style><!--
/* Font Definitions */
@font-face
{font-family:SimSun;
panose-1:2 1 6 0 3 1 1 1 1 1;}
@font-face
{font-family:SimSun;
panose-1:2 1 6 0 3 1 1 1 1 1;}
@font-face
{font-family:Calibri;
panose-1:2 15 5 2 2 2 4 3 2 4;}
@font-face
{font-family:Tahoma;
panose-1:2 11 6 4 3 5 4 4 2 4;}
@font-face
{font-family:"\@SimSun";
panose-1:2 1 6 0 3 1 1 1 1 1;}
/* Style Definitions */
p.MsoNormal, li.MsoNormal, div.MsoNormal
{margin:0in;
margin-bottom:.0001pt;
font-size:12.0pt;
font-family:"Times New Roman","serif";}
a:link, span.MsoHyperlink
{mso-style-priority:99;
color:blue;
text-decoration:underline;}
a:visited, span.MsoHyperlinkFollowed
{mso-style-priority:99;
color:purple;
text-decoration:underline;}
span.apple-converted-space
{mso-style-name:apple-converted-space;}
span.EmailStyle18
{mso-style-type:personal-reply;
font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";
color:#1F497D;}
.MsoChpDefault
{mso-style-type:export-only;
font-size:10.0pt;}
@page WordSection1
{size:8.5in 11.0in;
margin:1.0in 1.0in 1.0in 1.0in;}
div.WordSection1
{page:WordSection1;}
--></style><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
<o:shapedefaults v:ext="edit" spidmax="1026" />
</xml><![endif]--><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
<o:shapelayout v:ext="edit">
<o:idmap v:ext="edit" data="1" />
</o:shapelayout></xml><![endif]--></head><body lang=EN-US link=blue vlink=purple><div class=WordSection1><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1F497D'>I’m going to come at this from a completely different direction. I fly advanced and will fly whatever sequence the sequence committee sends my way. If I find out I can’t fly it safely then I will move back to intermediate. My expectation is that I won’t fly a sequence that I don’t feel I can fly safely in taxing situations like high winds or low light conditions. I don’t think the sequence committee should design a sequence to make sure I or we can fly competitively. I have a lower threshold, I just expect to be able to fly it safely especially in taxing situations. If I thought I could move up to Masters and fly it safely in taxing situations then I would move up. I don’t expect to move up to Masters and fly it competently or even competitively. <o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1F497D'><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1F497D'>It seems there are enough members who are seriously concerned about the new sequences. So why do we need to make such a rash decision to make the advanced and masters sequences more difficult at this time? Let’s lower the difficulty for this cycle and in the meantime let’s send out another survey where we can vote on these issues and move on. It seems like we are putting the cart before the horse.<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1F497D'><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1F497D'>Ron<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1F497D'><o:p> </o:p></span></p><div><div style='border:none;border-top:solid #B5C4DF 1.0pt;padding:3.0pt 0in 0in 0in'><p class=MsoNormal><b><span style='font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Tahoma","sans-serif"'>From:</span></b><span style='font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Tahoma","sans-serif"'> NSRCA-discussion [mailto:nsrca-discussion-bounces@lists.nsrca.org] <b>On Behalf Of </b>John Ford via NSRCA-discussion<br><b>Sent:</b> Tuesday, August 19, 2014 3:01 PM<br><b>To:</b> lucky macy; General pattern discussion<br><b>Subject:</b> Re: [NSRCA-discussion] 2015 proposed sequences<o:p></o:p></span></p></div></div><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal>I agree with Lucky. <o:p></o:p></p><div><p class=MsoNormal>I don't know how many people have mentioned to me over the years that the top pilots stopped attending local contests when the TOC was in full swing…not necessarily for the wrong reasons, but because being competitive at the TOC took 110% of time and resources. <o:p></o:p></p></div><div><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p></div><div><p class=MsoNormal>There is an attraction to contests by virtue of the halo effect of the top pilots…simply because everyone wants to see what they use, how it is set up, how they fly…chat about trimming, chat about nothing at all, just to chat, etc, etc.<o:p></o:p></p></div><div><p class=MsoNormal>When they did show up, it sent the message that they valued the event, and valued the sport.<o:p></o:p></p></div><div><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p></div><div><p class=MsoNormal>Same is true of any other sport, I guess.<o:p></o:p></p></div><div><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p></div><div><p class=MsoNormal>John<o:p></o:p></p></div><div><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p></div><div><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p></div><div><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p><div><div><p class=MsoNormal>On Aug 19, 2014, at 1:48 PM, lucky macy via NSRCA-discussion <<a href="mailto:nsrca-discussion@lists.nsrca.org">nsrca-discussion@lists.nsrca.org</a>> wrote:<o:p></o:p></p></div><p class=MsoNormal style='margin-bottom:12.0pt'><o:p> </o:p></p><div><div><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif"'>speaking of WOW factor and TOC...<br> <br>Yes, highly visible TOC (largest aviation purse prize at the time whether RC or full scale) encouraged the big and bold engines/airframes but neither insider or general media coverage made more than a brief mention on how the pilots were exactly chosen and how it was years of pattern devotion that got them the skills and the invite to the TOC in the first place. And as a caller for a TOC pilot one year and having a ringside seat to TOC pilots talking to the 'fans' and to the occoasional reporter, they didn't promote pattern themselves either whenever I was listening. Ha, I never heard one ever mention pattern or suggest to fans to give pattern a shot. Didn't mean it never happened when I wasn't around but I was keenly interested in the pattern connection back then as I had just started to compete myself so was very sensitive to anything said about it, or lack there of, and that impression never left me. Pattern just didn't get it's due recognition starting at least back in the mid 90s. If the die hard fans really didn't get the pattern connection beyond the 'yeah he's probably a good pattern flyer too' then how would joe average club flyer ever see it and be motivated?<br> <br>Doesn't help that many of the once recognizable pattern names that could still be flying and getting coverage aren't. I'm thinking Mike McConville, Peter Goldsmith, Dave Von Linsowe, Mike Klein and a host of others now with that used to kick butt in pattern. Makes one wonder, did a generation fly pattern with the main incentive to become TOC pilots? No more TOC, no more incentive for a large chunk of the ultra skilled and competitive types? Makes you really appreciate the Shulman and the Hyde types who keep going at it after they've been to the top of the mountain that doesn't exist anymore.<br> <br> <o:p></o:p></span></p><div><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif"'>> To:<span class=apple-converted-space> </span><a href="mailto:jsf106@gmail.com">jsf106@gmail.com</a>;<span class=apple-converted-space> </span><a href="mailto:nsrca-discussion@lists.nsrca.org">nsrca-discussion@lists.nsrca.org</a><br>> Date: Tue, 19 Aug 2014 09:35:40 -0700<br>> Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] 2015 proposed sequences<br>> From:<span class=apple-converted-space> </span><a href="mailto:nsrca-discussion@lists.nsrca.org">nsrca-discussion@lists.nsrca.org</a><br>><span class=apple-converted-space> </span><br>> Your right, we as individuals need to be visible locally and encourage /<br>> help club members mildly interested in flying aerobatics. They may be<br>> getting board flying trainers in a racetrack pattern.<br>> The WOW FACTOR shifted away from pattern about the time the TOC fielded<br>> large aerobatic aircraft in a highly visible environment.<br>> Jim<span class=apple-converted-space> </span><br>><span class=apple-converted-space> </span><br>> -----Original Message-----<br>> From: NSRCA-discussion [mailto:nsrca-<a href="mailto:discussion-bounces@lists.nsrca.org">discussion-bounces@lists.nsrca.org</a>] On<br>> Behalf Of John Ford via NSRCA-discussion<br>> Sent: Tuesday, August 19, 2014 5:36 AM<br>> To: Whodaddy Whodaddy; General pattern discussion<br>> Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] 2015 proposed sequences<br>><span class=apple-converted-space> </span><br>> To my knowledge, I don't think I've heard too many (or any) pilots quit<br>> pattern because it was too hard to do, or too expensive, or anything else.<span class=apple-converted-space> </span><br>> IMAC and helicopters are at least as expensive, if not more, and the<br>> classes' difficulty levels mirror our own, in my opinion.<span class=apple-converted-space> </span><br>><span class=apple-converted-space> </span><br>> What makes the difference is marketing. IMAC and helis are always high<br>> profile at any event, the promoters do a good job of "selling" the pilots<br>> and the equipment. Hobby shops always showcase the latest or the biggest.<br>> The magazine adds almost always choose IMAC or helis to promote radios,<br>> batteries, or fuels.<br>><span class=apple-converted-space> </span><br>> Back when Pattern was big and local contests had 40 pilots, the cover of the<br>> magazines featured Hanno, Ivan, or Rhet, and the full-page glossy back cover<br>> was of Ivan and his Summit 3, endorsing Carl Golberg widgets.<span class=apple-converted-space> </span><br>><span class=apple-converted-space> </span><br>> Today, if you walk in off the street as a rank beginner and you try to<br>> "find" pattern, you gotta dig deep, go far, send lots of emails, and finally<br>> you might (never for sure) come across a contest flyer. Then you go to the<br>> contest and you find a bunch of really nice people, willing to drown you in<br>> advice and help, but you realize pretty quickly that this group of people<br>> are a bit off-center.sharply focused on planes, endless trimming, practicing<br>> to the exclusion of all else, and sleeping on a bed of nails at night. Above<br>> all, almost nobody knows they even exist in this little hidden world of RC<br>> idealism.<br>><span class=apple-converted-space> </span><br>> Go to a hobby shop and say you want to do helicopters.same reaction as<br>> walking into a ER saying you have chest pains.<span class=apple-converted-space> </span><br>> Go to a hobby shop and say you want to do pattern.hmmm."well, there's a guy<br>> I used to know that did some of that, I think, not sure if he's still<br>> around.haven't seen him for a few years"...<br>><span class=apple-converted-space> </span><br>> That's where the difference is.<span class=apple-converted-space> </span><br>><span class=apple-converted-space> </span><br>> John<br>><span class=apple-converted-space> </span><br>><span class=apple-converted-space> </span><br>> On Aug 19, 2014, at 7:14 AM, Whodaddy Whodaddy via NSRCA-discussion<br>> <<a href="mailto:nsrca-discussion@lists.nsrca.org">nsrca-discussion@lists.nsrca.org</a>> wrote:<br>><span class=apple-converted-space> </span><br>> > K factors should be rethought .. An eight point role with my Phoenix 8 is<br>> alot different than with my current 2 meter .. Its like flying a gift now<br>> days other than centering of the maneuver yet retains the same or close to<br>> the same k factor as many years past... Food for thought...<span class=apple-converted-space> </span><br>> ><span class=apple-converted-space> </span><br>> > Once again the current proposed pattern needs fixed or the numbers will<br>> dwindle by at least one nxt year.. I can promise that..<br>> ><span class=apple-converted-space> </span><br>> ><span class=apple-converted-space> </span><br>> > Gary<span class=apple-converted-space> </span><br>> ><span class=apple-converted-space> </span><br>> ><span class=apple-converted-space> </span><br>> > Sent from my iPhone<br>> ><span class=apple-converted-space> </span><br>> >> On Aug 18, 2014, at 11:34 PM, John Gayer via NSRCA-discussion<br>> <<a href="mailto:nsrca-discussion@lists.nsrca.org">nsrca-discussion@lists.nsrca.org</a>> wrote:<br>> >><span class=apple-converted-space> </span><br>> >> Advanced and Masters are not our entry classes and should not affect<br>> future participation. Those new to pattern should begin in either Sportsman<br>> or Intermediate depending on skill level. When a flyer feels he is ready to<br>> move up, he will try flying the next class in practice. If it is too<br>> difficult to even see a way to fly that sequence reasonably, then that pilot<br>> was not ready to move up and should stay in his current class another year<br>> (or more). We do not lose people because they stayed in their current class,<br>> we lose them because they moved up when not ready and find they are<br>> outclassed without the vision, coordination, time to practice (or name your<br>> reason) to be competitive. Not competitive for winning, just competitive.<span class=apple-converted-space> </span><br>> >> Both Masters and Advanced can, and probably will be, changed next year.<br>> Any substantial problems can be addressed then. Many have tested these<br>> sequences. All have have flown them successfully, if not always happily. We<br>> can go on and on about ugly maneuvers, difficulty levels and dislike of<br>> change but that happens every cycle.<span class=apple-converted-space> </span><br>> >><span class=apple-converted-space> </span><br>> >> Just for comparison here are Advanced and Masters from 20 years ago.<br>> Overall both appear somewhat easier than the current sequences we are flying<br>> but not a lot. Total KFactors are a bit lower. Also we are flying many of<br>> the same maneuvers. I hope you noticed the knife edge top of the cobra in<br>> masters. If you go back even further you can find a two roll loop in the<br>> days before retracts...<br>> >><span class=apple-converted-space> </span><br>> >> John Gayer<br>> >><span class=apple-converted-space> </span><br>> >><span class=apple-converted-space> </span><br>> >> <ejceefij.png><eibcgfea.png><br>> >> _______________________________________________<br>> >> NSRCA-discussion mailing list<br>> >> <a href="mailto:NSRCA-discussion@lists.nsrca.org">NSRCA-discussion@lists.nsrca.org</a><br>> >> <a href="http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion">http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion</a><br>> > _______________________________________________<br>> > NSRCA-discussion mailing list<br>> > <a href="mailto:NSRCA-discussion@lists.nsrca.org">NSRCA-discussion@lists.nsrca.org</a><br>> > <a href="http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion">http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion</a><br>><span class=apple-converted-space> </span><br>> _______________________________________________<br>> NSRCA-discussion mailing list<br>> <a href="mailto:NSRCA-discussion@lists.nsrca.org">NSRCA-discussion@lists.nsrca.org</a><br>> <a href="http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion">http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion</a><br>><span class=apple-converted-space> </span><br>> _______________________________________________<br>> NSRCA-discussion mailing list<br>><span class=apple-converted-space> </span><a href="mailto:NSRCA-discussion@lists.nsrca.org">NSRCA-discussion@lists.nsrca.org</a><br>><span class=apple-converted-space> </span><a href="http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion">http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion</a><o:p></o:p></span></p></div></div><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif"'>_______________________________________________<br>NSRCA-discussion mailing list<br><a href="mailto:NSRCA-discussion@lists.nsrca.org">NSRCA-discussion@lists.nsrca.org</a><br><a href="http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion">http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion</a><o:p></o:p></span></p></div></div><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p></div><p class=MsoNormal><br><br>__________ Information from ESET Smart Security, version of virus signature database 10278 (20140819) __________<br><br>The message was checked by ESET Smart Security.<br><br><a href="http://www.eset.com">http://www.eset.com</a><br><br><br>__________ Information from ESET Smart Security, version of virus signature database 10278 (20140819) __________<br><br>The message was checked by ESET Smart Security.<br><br><a href="http://www.eset.com">http://www.eset.com</a><br><br><br>__________ Information from ESET Smart Security, version of virus signature database 10282 (20140819) __________<br><br>The message was checked by ESET Smart Security.<br><br><a href="http://www.eset.com">http://www.eset.com</a><br><br><br>__________ Information from ESET Smart Security, version of virus signature database 10284 (20140820) __________<br><br>The message was checked by ESET Smart Security.<br><br><a href="http://www.eset.com">http://www.eset.com</a><o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal><br><br>__________ Information from ESET Smart Security, version of virus signature database 10284 (20140820) __________<br><br>The message was checked by ESET Smart Security.<br><br><a href="http://www.eset.com">http://www.eset.com</a><o:p></o:p></p></div></body></html>