<html><head><meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html charset=windows-1252"></head><body style="word-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; -webkit-line-break: after-white-space;">THAT’S the phrase I was looking for! Document control!<div><br></div><div>Rich</div><div><br><div><div>On Aug 4, 2014, at 3:34 PM, Anthony Romano via NSRCA-discussion <<a href="mailto:nsrca-discussion@lists.nsrca.org">nsrca-discussion@lists.nsrca.org</a>> wrote:</div><br class="Apple-interchange-newline"><blockquote type="cite"><div class="hmmessage" style="font-size: 12pt; font-family: Calibri; font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; font-weight: normal; letter-spacing: normal; line-height: normal; orphans: auto; text-align: start; text-indent: 0px; text-transform: none; white-space: normal; widows: auto; word-spacing: 0px; -webkit-text-stroke-width: 0px;"><div dir="ltr"><div>After flying the previous version this weekend the revision looks very good. Adding the half roll to the shark's tooth makes a much better balance to the amount of inverted flight and complexity of the sequence. The triangle is an interesting way to add some inverted at a safer altitude. The reverse cuban from the top could be taxing but looking forward to hearing the feedback from the advanced pilots in my club.</div><div><br></div><div>Anthony Romano</div><div><br></div><div><span style="font-size: 12pt;">Revision numbers or a date would be a good idea! Document control always helps.</span></div><div><br><div><hr id="stopSpelling">Date: Mon, 4 Aug 2014 15:22:56 -0400<br>To: <a href="mailto:revolutionman@gci.net">revolutionman@gci.net</a>; <a href="mailto:nsrca-discussion@lists.nsrca.org">nsrca-discussion@lists.nsrca.org</a><br>Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] 2015 Proposed Advanced Sequence<br>From: <a href="mailto:nsrca-discussion@lists.nsrca.org">nsrca-discussion@lists.nsrca.org</a><br><br><div>Thanks!</div><div><br></div>I would suggest, just for giggles, on<span class="Apple-converted-space"> </span><i>any</i><span class="Apple-converted-space"> </span>of the sequences, a version # or date be added with the link. Or a little GIF saying “NEW”? <div><br></div><div>Jason and Mike are out flying the newest revision. I like it!</div><div><br></div><div>Rich Bohn<br><div><br></div><div><br><div><div>On Aug 4, 2014, at 3:03 PM, RJ Bohn via NSRCA-discussion <<a href="mailto:nsrca-discussion@lists.nsrca.org">nsrca-discussion@lists.nsrca.org</a>> wrote:</div><br class="ecxApple-interchange-newline"><blockquote><div style="word-wrap: break-word;">ALCON,<div><br></div><div> I went to the site and found the same sequence as last week… I think. Are these .pdf files dated anywhere? </div><div><br></div><div>Richard Bohn</div><div><br></div><div><br><div><div>On Aug 4, 2014, at 2:36 PM, Jas via NSRCA-discussion <<a href="mailto:nsrca-discussion@lists.nsrca.org">nsrca-discussion@lists.nsrca.org</a>> wrote:</div><br class="ecxApple-interchange-newline"><blockquote><div dir="auto" style="font-family: Tahoma; font-size: 12pt; font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; font-weight: normal; letter-spacing: normal; line-height: normal; text-align: start; text-indent: 0px; text-transform: none; white-space: normal; word-spacing: 0px;"><div>Dale,</div><div><br></div><div>I'm out at the field with one of our Advanced pilots and he likes the changes. I'm going to fly through it once for him and then call it for him. Updates later.<br><br>Sent from my iP</div><div><br>On Aug 4, 2014, at 12:24 PM, Dale Olstinske via NSRCA-discussion <<a href="mailto:nsrca-discussion@lists.nsrca.org">nsrca-discussion@lists.nsrca.org</a>> wrote:<br><br></div><div><span></span></div><blockquote><div>Over that past few weeks, we have received a lot of input from the membership about the Advanced sequence proposed for 2015. To everyone who has, a big thanks, we really need this in order to develop sequences that meet the expectations of the majority of the membership. I would add, it is very helpful when these inputs are specific, not just "I don't like it". Much of the criticism about this sequence was in two areas, difficulty and new maneuvers, let me address each. </div><div> </div><div>The guide allows for new maneuvers to be created. The list of maneuvers in the development guide is not meant to be exhaustive. Each time we develop new schedules, new ones are created or borrowed from other disciplines, like F3A or even do I dare say, IMAC LOL! In this proposed sequence, there are a few maneuvers that were previously not in the catalog, like the Immelman with full rolls, the Hour Glass or the Cobra as we defined. As along at these are in line with class guidelines and it's felt they are appropriate, they are added to the list of allowable maneuvers. Specifically, the Hour Glass was added because we all felt it was appropriate, and a variant of that maneuver is now in Masters and F3A-P. So as you will see, we left it in.</div><div> </div><div>As to difficulty, we had enough pilots indicate concern, that we took another look. In doing so, we realized that we had exceeded some of the boundaries set forth in the Advanced section. The guide has been a living breathing document for the past few cycles, so we could have modified the guide to allow for this sequence, but it was felt this was the wrong approach. Now, for the next cycle, we will be recommending some changes to the guide (for BOD approval) which would allow more flexibility, however for now, we are modifying the sequence to adhere to the guidelines. Specifically, there are only limited number of inverted entries and exits, on turn around maneuvers, executed at a low altitude. You will see in the new sequence, we simply added and removed rolls, which brought the number of inverted sections in line. The basic structure and class of each maneuvers, are really unchanged.</div><div> </div><div>The new sequence is now posted on the NSRCA web site. Again a big thanks for all who took the time to let us know.</div><div> </div><div>Dale</div><div>Sequence Committee</div></blockquote><blockquote><span>_______________________________________________</span><br><span>NSRCA-discussion mailing list</span><br><span><a href="mailto:NSRCA-discussion@lists.nsrca.org">NSRCA-discussion@lists.nsrca.org</a></span><br><span><a href="http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion" target="_blank">http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion</a></span></blockquote>_______________________________________________<br>NSRCA-discussion mailing list<br><a href="mailto:NSRCA-discussion@lists.nsrca.org">NSRCA-discussion@lists.nsrca.org</a><br><a href="http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion" target="_blank">http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion</a></div></blockquote></div><br></div></div>_______________________________________________<br>NSRCA-discussion mailing list<br><a href="mailto:NSRCA-discussion@lists.nsrca.org">NSRCA-discussion@lists.nsrca.org</a><br><a href="http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion">http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion</a></blockquote></div><br></div></div><br>_______________________________________________ NSRCA-discussion mailing list<span class="Apple-converted-space"> </span><a href="mailto:NSRCA-discussion@lists.nsrca.org">NSRCA-discussion@lists.nsrca.org</a><a href="http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion">http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion</a></div></div></div>_______________________________________________<br>NSRCA-discussion mailing list<br><a href="mailto:NSRCA-discussion@lists.nsrca.org">NSRCA-discussion@lists.nsrca.org</a><br><a href="http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion">http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion</a></div></blockquote></div><br></div></body></html>