<HTML xmlns="http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-html40" xmlns:v = "urn:schemas-microsoft-com:vml" xmlns:o = "urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office" xmlns:w = "urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:word" xmlns:m = "http://schemas.microsoft.com/office/2004/12/omml"><HEAD>
<STYLE id=eMClientCss>BLOCKQUOTE.cite {
PADDING-LEFT: 10px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; BORDER-LEFT: #cccccc 1px solid; PADDING-RIGHT: 0px; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px
}
BLOCKQUOTE.cite2 {
PADDING-TOP: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 10px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; BORDER-LEFT: #cccccc 1px solid; MARGIN-TOP: 3px; PADDING-RIGHT: 0px; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px
}
.plain PRE {
FONT-SIZE: 100%; FONT-FAMILY: monospace; FONT-WEIGHT: normal; FONT-STYLE: normal
}
.plain TT {
FONT-SIZE: 100%; FONT-FAMILY: monospace; FONT-WEIGHT: normal; FONT-STYLE: normal
}
#77850c8da4aa4c1aa0f0b4f93e32728b {
FONT-SIZE: 12pt; FONT-FAMILY: Tahoma
}
.plain PRE {
FONT-SIZE: 12pt; FONT-FAMILY: Tahoma
}
.plain TT {
FONT-SIZE: 12pt; FONT-FAMILY: Tahoma
}
BODY {
FONT-SIZE: 12pt; FONT-FAMILY: Tahoma
}
#414fc1b17cff4941821303ed3646b72c SPAN.MsoHyperlink {
TEXT-DECORATION: underline; COLOR: blue; mso-style-priority: 99
}
#414fc1b17cff4941821303ed3646b72c SPAN.MsoHyperlinkFollowed {
TEXT-DECORATION: underline; COLOR: purple; mso-style-priority: 99
}
</STYLE>
<STYLE>#414fc1b17cff4941821303ed3646b72c DIV.MsoNormal, #414fc1b17cff4941821303ed3646b72c LI.MsoNormal, #414fc1b17cff4941821303ed3646b72c P.MsoNormal
{FONT-SIZE: 11pt; FONT-FAMILY: "Calibri","sans-serif"; MARGIN: 0in 0in 10pt; LINE-HEIGHT: 115%}
#414fc1b17cff4941821303ed3646b72c A:link, #414fc1b17cff4941821303ed3646b72c SPAN.MsoHyperlink
{TEXT-DECORATION: underline; COLOR: blue; mso-style-priority: 99}
#414fc1b17cff4941821303ed3646b72c A:visited, #414fc1b17cff4941821303ed3646b72c SPAN.MsoHyperlinkFollowed
{TEXT-DECORATION: underline; COLOR: purple; mso-style-priority: 99}
#414fc1b17cff4941821303ed3646b72c SPAN.EmailStyle17
{FONT-FAMILY: "Calibri","sans-serif"; COLOR: windowtext; mso-style-type: personal-compose}
#414fc1b17cff4941821303ed3646b72c .MsoChpDefault
{FONT-FAMILY: "Calibri","sans-serif"; mso-style-type: export-only}
#414fc1b17cff4941821303ed3646b72c DIV.WordSection1
{page: WordSection1}
</STYLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY lang=EN-US scroll=auto link=blue vLink=purple class>
<DIV>Gary, </DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>We can't possibly create sequences which everyone likes. Clearly we know which camp you are in :)</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>I don't see how the proposed sequence is more demanding on equipment than current, can you quantify that?</DIV>
<DIV>You make a good point about the K Factors, that will be revisited.</DIV>
<DIV>When you say "<SPAN id=77850c8da4aa4c1aa0f0b4f93e32728b>relationship to proceeding and succeeding maneuvers are not taken into account</SPAN>" I can assure you that is not the case. The committee debated every maneuver in each sequence and how well the fit with the next. Can you be more specific about "<SPAN id=d6e89ec0db604f51a2f1862585e37e2f>As in # 5 to #6 and #9 to #10 to #11</SPAN>"</DIV>
<DIV>I'm also wondering what you mean by the hour glass being butchered? This maneuver is straight form the catalog and of all the variations, is the easiest, starting at the middle, top first with both loops being inside.</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>Not trying to be defensive, just need to understand.</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>Thanks,</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>Dale</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>------ Original Message ------</DIV>
<DIV>From: "Gary Switala via NSRCA-discussion" <<A href="mailto:nsrca-discussion@lists.nsrca.org">nsrca-discussion@lists.nsrca.org</A>></DIV>
<DIV>To: <A href="mailto:nsrca-discussion@lists.nsrca.org">nsrca-discussion@lists.nsrca.org</A></DIV>
<DIV>Sent: 7/27/2014 4:39:02 PM</DIV>
<DIV>Subject: [NSRCA-discussion] 2015 proposed Advanced maneuvers</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV id=414fc1b17cff4941821303ed3646b72c>
<BLOCKQUOTE class=cite2 cite=000a01cfa9f3$f29ce7b0$d7d6b710$@cox.net type="cite">
<DIV class=WordSection1>
<P class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></P>
<P class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></P>
<P class=MsoNormal> My comments on the new Advance schedule. I have 20 + flights on it with both other pattern guys and club members observing. The comments of the club members are: “Why is everything upside down?“; “ makes no sense to me“; from the pattern guys “ugly, damn ugly”; and “WTF.” From the flights I have put in I see that it’s not for the average Advanced flyer with an average plane with an average motor with an average battery set and with an average ESC . So looks like more $$$$ needs to be spent. Some of the maneuvers are bad enough, but the way they are arranged the true difficulty in their relationship to proceeding and succeeding maneuvers are not taken into account. As in # 5 to #6 and #9 to #10 to #11. I also do not understand why the figure 9 is only a K Factor of 1?? And why is the Shark’s tooth given the same K as the one we’re doing now. The new proposed one is an entirely different maneuver and considerably more difficult as proposed. This is a descending maneuver at 45 degs. doing 2/2 reverse rolls trying to slow the model down and hold a straight line and have enough speed and power to get through the outside Avalanche. I also take exception with the way the Hourglass has been butchered. It would make more sense replacing it with the Standing Eight starting in the center with options as it would add some of the missing gracefulness needed.<o:p></o:p></P>
<P class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></P>
<P class=MsoNormal>Caution<o:p></o:p></P>
<P class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></P></DIV></BLOCKQUOTE></DIV></BODY></HTML>