<div dir="ltr">There are several references to "rules for model aviation in the NAS already existing in section 91" (where the 400 foot rule exists) with the extended authorization of the modernization act to operations within 5 miles of an airport.<div>
<br></div><div>Peter+</div></div><div class="gmail_extra"><br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Tue, Jun 24, 2014 at 4:48 PM, SilentAV8R <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:Silentav8r@cox.net" target="_blank">Silentav8r@cox.net</a>></span> wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
<div bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000">
<div>I have read it twice now and I have not
seen any specific mention of the "400-foot rule." Can you cite
the section of the document since it appears I missed it??<div class=""><br>
<br>
<br>
On 6/24/14, 10:47 AM, Peter Vogel wrote:<br>
</div></div>
<blockquote type="cite"><div class="">
<div dir="ltr">I read the full text of their interpretation of the
"special rule for model aircraft" last night, I think the
potential impact to pattern is their attempt to reinforce the
400 foot altitude limit (with no radius considerations for full
scale airports) and extend the full scale airport notification
radius to 5 miles (from 3 that was in 91-57) to require
notification of model aircraft activity.
<div>
<br>
</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>Their absolute denial of goggle-based FPV (the pilot MUST
always maintain LOS to their plane, it's not sufficient to
have a spotter ready to take over) is going to create a lot of
lawlessness in the FPV community but shouldn't impact pattern.</div>
</div>
</div><div class="gmail_extra"><br>
<br>
<div class="gmail_quote"><div class="">On Tue, Jun 24, 2014 at 7:58 AM,
SilentAV8R via NSRCA-discussion <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:nsrca-discussion@lists.nsrca.org" target="_blank">nsrca-discussion@lists.nsrca.org</a>></span>
wrote:<br>
</div><div><div class="h5"><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
<div bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000">
<div>Actually, the FAA is now prohibiting FPV of any kind.<br>
<br>
<a href="http://motherboard.vice.com/read/the-faa-is-trying-to-ban-first-person-view-drone-flights?trk_source=recommended" target="_blank">http://motherboard.vice.com/read/the-faa-is-trying-to-ban-first-person-view-drone-flights?trk_source=recommended</a><br>
<br>
<a href="http://www.faa.gov/news/press_releases/news_story.cfm?newsId=16474&cid=TW223" target="_blank">http://www.faa.gov/news/press_releases/news_story.cfm?newsId=16474&cid=TW223</a><br>
<br>
<a href="http://www.faa.gov/about/initiatives/uas/media/model_aircraft_spec_rule.pdf" target="_blank">http://www.faa.gov/about/initiatives/uas/media/model_aircraft_spec_rule.pdf</a><br>
<br>
Bill
<div>
<div><br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
On 6/24/14, 7:27 AM, Scott McHarg via
NSRCA-discussion wrote:<br>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<blockquote type="cite">
<div>
<div>
<div dir="ltr">
<div class="gmail_default">Gentlemen,</div>
<div class="gmail_default"> <br>
</div>
<div class="gmail_default">This article was
published in USA Today. It doesn't really
affect us as Pattern folk but it is something we
should be cognizant of as well as be on the
lookout at our local fields for. The main thing
is that the FAA is allowing FPV flight but not
outside of visual range. I've seen many many
people take their quad copters far beyond visual
range. Big fines can happen for sure.</div>
<div class="gmail_default"><br>
</div>
<div class="gmail_default"><font color="#0000ff" face="comic sans ms, sans-serif"><a href="http://www.usatoday.com/story/travel/news/2014/06/23/faa-drones-rules-model-hobbyist-plane-pilots/11268597/" target="_blank">http://www.usatoday.com/story/travel/news/2014/06/23/faa-drones-rules-model-hobbyist-plane-pilots/11268597/</a></font><br>
</div>
<div class="gmail_default"><font color="#0000ff" face="comic sans ms, sans-serif"><br>
</font></div>
<div class="gmail_default"><font color="#0000ff" face="comic sans ms, sans-serif"><br>
</font></div>
<div> <br>
</div>
-- <br>
<b style="color:rgb(51,51,255)"><font size="4">Scott
A. McHarg</font></b><br>
Sr. Systems Engineer - Infrastructure<br>
</div>
<br>
<fieldset></fieldset>
<br>
</div>
</div>
<pre>_______________________________________________
NSRCA-discussion mailing list
<a href="mailto:NSRCA-discussion@lists.nsrca.org" target="_blank">NSRCA-discussion@lists.nsrca.org</a>
<a href="http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion" target="_blank">http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion</a></pre>
</blockquote>
<br>
</div>
<br>
_______________________________________________<br>
NSRCA-discussion mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:NSRCA-discussion@lists.nsrca.org" target="_blank">NSRCA-discussion@lists.nsrca.org</a><br>
<a href="http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion" target="_blank">http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion</a><br>
</blockquote>
</div></div></div>
<br>
<br clear="all">
<div><br>
</div><div class="">
-- <br>
<div>Director, Fixed Wing Flight Training</div>
<div>Santa Clara County Model Aircraft Skypark</div>
<img src="http://farm8.staticflickr.com/7163/6513778381_5569cc985d_m.jpg" height="154" width="200"><br>
</div></div>
</blockquote>
<br>
</div>
</blockquote></div><br><br clear="all"><div><br></div>-- <br><div>Director, Fixed Wing Flight Training</div><div>Santa Clara County Model Aircraft Skypark</div><img src="http://farm8.staticflickr.com/7163/6513778381_5569cc985d_m.jpg" width="200" height="154"><br>
</div>