<html><head><meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8"></head><body ><div>Guys,</div><div>A friend of mine is looking for a used/working/in good condition Spin 99 esc. I don't know why he is looking for a used one when he gets a really good deal from me. He is looking for a cheap one. </div><div>If anyone has one, please contact me direct please.</div><div><br></div><div>Thanks,</div><div><br></div><div>Ihncheol</div><div>PnAHobbies@sbcglobal.net</div><div><br></div><div><br></div><div><div style="font-size:75%;color:#575757">Sent from my Samsung Galaxy Note® II</div></div><br><br><br>-------- Original message --------<br>From: Verne Koester <verne@twmi.rr.com> <br>Date: 10/01/2013 10:02 PM (GMT-06:00) <br>To: 'General pattern discussion' <nsrca-discussion@lists.nsrca.org> <br>Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Master's sequence question <br> <br><br>Hi Bob,<br>Entry and exit altitudes can be different. Rolls on each line must be centered on that line segment.<br><br>Verne Koester<br><br>-----Original Message-----<br>From: nsrca-discussion-bounces@lists.nsrca.org [mailto:nsrca-discussion-bounces@lists.nsrca.org] On Behalf Of Bob Moulder<br>Sent: Tuesday, October 01, 2013 7:22 PM<br>To: nsrca-discussion@lists.nsrca.org<br>Cc: nsrca-discussion@lists.nsrca.org<br>Subject: [NSRCA-discussion] Master's sequence question<br><br>On maneuver #11 (humpty 3/4 up 1/4 down inverted exit) do the entry and exit altitudes have to be the same?<br><br>I read the maneuver description and this is not mentioned as it is in the other humpty descriptions which indicate they need not be the same. <br>I assume that they need not be the same since this maneuver provides an opportunity for in/out track adjustment and probably also for altitude... but there I go assuming things.<br><br>-- Bob<br> <br> <br> On Tue, Oct 01, 2013 at 04:00 PM,<br>nsrca-discussion-request@lists.nsrca.org wrote:<br> <br> > Send NSRCA-discussion mailing list submissions to<br>> nsrca-discussion@lists.nsrca.org<br>><br>> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit<br>> http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion<br>> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to<br>> nsrca-discussion-request@lists.nsrca.org<br>><br>> You can reach the person managing the list at<br>> nsrca-discussion-owner@lists.nsrca.org<br>><br>> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific <br>> than "Re: Contents of NSRCA-discussion digest..."<br>><br>><br>> Today's Topics:<br>><br>> 1. Re: P15 (Derek Koopowitz)<br>> 2. Re: P15 (Derek Koopowitz)<br>> 3. Re: nsrca shutdown??? (Phil S.)<br>><br>><br>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------<br>><br>> Message: 1<br>> Date: Mon, 30 Sep 2013 16:54:39 -0400<br>> From: Derek Koopowitz To: General pattern discussion Cc: General <br>> pattern discussion Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] P15<br>> Message-ID: <890CB554-B1CF-4852-B11C-7C477CE389C5@gmail.com><br>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"<br>><br>> I'm with Dave on this one...<br>><br>> Sent from my iPad<br>><br>>> On Sep 30, 2013, at 11:11 AM, "DaveL322@comcast.net" wrote:<br>>><br>>> Hmmm....<br>>><br>>> I am using more mah for P15 than P13 (and taking about 20 seconds<br>>> longer) and P13 was taking more mah than Masters.<br>>><br>>> Regards,<br>>><br>>> Dave<br>>><br>>> Sent from my HTC EVO 4G LTE exclusively from Sprint<br>>><br>>><br>>> ----- Reply message -----<br>>> From: "John Ford" To: "General pattern discussion" Subject: <br>>> [NSRCA-discussion] P15<br>>> Date: Mon, Sep 30, 2013 10:41<br>>><br>>><br>>> I judged P-15 last month at Harry Ell's contest, and at Ft Scott last <br>>> week?<br>>><br>>> Same observations?but also noticed that few were hitting and keeping <br>>> the 45's, and there's a lot of 45's.<br>>><br>>> On the other hand, interesting to see that P-15 is almost <br>>> "equal-or-easier" than Masters (and consumes less battery), but that <br>>> the F-15 appears to be considerably more complex by comparison.<br>>><br>>> John<br>>><br>>><br>>> On Sep 30, 2013, at 9:10 AM, Chuck Hochhalter wrote:<br>>><br>>>> Spent the weekend judging p-15.<br>>>><br>>>> Interesting sequence, first maneuver sets up the next 3, pyramid is <br>>>> a geometric pain in the transmitter, square on corner easy to make <br>>>> the second leg too long because of the roll.<br>>>><br>>>> Let the yapping begin.<br>>>><br>>>> Chuck<br>>>><br>>>> Sent from my iPhone<br>>>> _______________________________________________<br>>>> NSRCA-discussion mailing list<br>>>> NSRCA-discussion@lists.nsrca.org<br>>>> http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion<br>>><br>>> _______________________________________________<br>>> NSRCA-discussion mailing list<br>>> NSRCA-discussion@lists.nsrca.org<br>>> http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion<br>>> _______________________________________________<br>>> NSRCA-discussion mailing list<br>>> NSRCA-discussion@lists.nsrca.org<br>>> http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion<br>> -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was <br>> scrubbed...<br>> URL:<br>> ------------------------------<br>><br>> Message: 2<br>> Date: Mon, 30 Sep 2013 16:55:16 -0400<br>> From: Derek Koopowitz To: General pattern discussion Cc: General <br>> pattern discussion Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] P15<br>> Message-ID: <5A660B66-AD01-4FE9-A5EE-92E154A5F6A7@gmail.com><br>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"<br>><br>> +1<br>><br>> Sent from my iPad<br>><br>>> On Sep 30, 2013, at 11:15 AM, Jas wrote:<br>>><br>>> Same here. And F15 is even longer<br>>><br>>> iJason<br>>> www.jasonshangar.weebly.com<br>>><br>>>> On Sep 30, 2013, at 11:11 AM, "DaveL322@comcast.net" wrote:<br>>>><br>>>> Hmmm....<br>>>><br>>>> I am using more mah for P15 than P13 (and taking about 20 seconds<br>>>> longer) and P13 was taking more mah than Masters.<br>>>><br>>>> Regards,<br>>>><br>>>> Dave<br>>>><br>>>> Sent from my HTC EVO 4G LTE exclusively from Sprint<br>>>><br>>>><br>>>> ----- Reply message -----<br>>>> From: "John Ford" To: "General pattern discussion" Subject: <br>>>> [NSRCA-discussion] P15<br>>>> Date: Mon, Sep 30, 2013 10:41<br>>>><br>>>><br>>>> I judged P-15 last month at Harry Ell's contest, and at Ft Scott <br>>>> last week?<br>>>><br>>>> Same observations?but also noticed that few were hitting and keeping <br>>>> the 45's, and there's a lot of 45's.<br>>>><br>>>> On the other hand, interesting to see that P-15 is almost <br>>>> "equal-or-easier" than Masters (and consumes less battery), but that <br>>>> the F-15 appears to be considerably more complex by comparison.<br>>>><br>>>> John<br>>>><br>>>><br>>>> On Sep 30, 2013, at 9:10 AM, Chuck Hochhalter wrote:<br>>>><br>>>>> Spent the weekend judging p-15.<br>>>>><br>>>>> Interesting sequence, first maneuver sets up the next 3, pyramid is <br>>>>> a geometric pain in the transmitter, square on corner easy to make <br>>>>> the second leg too long because of the roll.<br>>>>><br>>>>> Let the yapping begin.<br>>>>><br>>>>> Chuck<br>>>>><br>>>>> Sent from my iPhone<br>>>>> _______________________________________________<br>>>>> NSRCA-discussion mailing list<br>>>>> NSRCA-discussion@lists.nsrca.org<br>>>>> http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion<br>>>><br>>>> _______________________________________________<br>>>> NSRCA-discussion mailing list<br>>>> NSRCA-discussion@lists.nsrca.org<br>>>> http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion<br>>>> _______________________________________________<br>>>> NSRCA-discussion mailing list<br>>>> NSRCA-discussion@lists.nsrca.org<br>>>> http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion<br>>> _______________________________________________<br>>> NSRCA-discussion mailing list<br>>> NSRCA-discussion@lists.nsrca.org<br>>> http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion<br>> -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was <br>> scrubbed...<br>> URL:<br>> ------------------------------<br>><br>> Message: 3<br>> Date: Mon, 30 Sep 2013 17:22:16 -0400<br>> From: "Phil S." To: General pattern discussion Subject: Re: <br>> [NSRCA-discussion] nsrca shutdown???<br>> Message-ID: <5249EB88.70508@comcast.net><br>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"; Format="flowed"<br>><br>> Well, Dave, the essential salaries of our "congressmen" would NOT get <br>> shut down! They don't earn the $191.000/yr they get when congress is <br>> in session and "functioning", so why deny them when the government is <br>> shut down?<br>><br>> Phil Spelt, KCRC Emeritus, Past President AMA 1294 Scientific Leader <br>> Member SPA L-18, Board Member (865)435-1476v, (865)604-0541c<br>><br>><br>> On 9/30/2013 11:53 AM, Dave Burton wrote:<br>>><br>>> I'm having trouble seeing the downside of a Govt. shutdown. Perhaps <br>>> they would run all essential stuff and shut down the non essential <br>>> stuff!<br>>><br>>> Naaah, that wouldn't happen, probably the other way around.<br>>><br>>> *From:* nsrca-discussion-bounces@lists.nsrca.org<br>>> [mailto:nsrca-discussion-bounces@lists.nsrca.org] *On Behalf Of <br>>> *Ronald Van Putte<br>>> *Sent:* Monday, September 30, 2013 10:08 AM<br>>> *To:* General pattern discussion<br>>> *Subject:* Re: [NSRCA-discussion] nsrca shutdown???<br>>><br>>> No, the downwind turn is easier to understand and makes more sense.<br>>><br>>> BTW, all those in favor of having the salaries of all members of <br>>> Congress and their staffs suspended until they get the job done, say, <br>>> "Aye".<br>>><br>>> Ron<br>>><br>>> On Sep 30, 2013, at 9:55 AM, Randy Forbus wrote:<br>>><br>>><br>>><br>>> Is this the same as the government shut down?<br>>><br>>> <br>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------<br>>> ---<br>>><br>>> From: vanputter@gmail.com Date: Mon, 30 Sep 2013 09:53:23 -0500<br>>> To: mups1953@yahoo.com ; nsrca-discussion@lists.nsrca.org Subject: <br>>> Re: [NSRCA-discussion] nsrca shutdown???<br>>><br>>> Or the downwind turn.<br>>><br>>> Ron<br>>><br>>> On Sep 30, 2013, at 8:56 AM, mike mueller wrote:<br>>><br>>> What we need is a discussion on snap rolls. That'll wake everyone<br>>> up. Mike<br>>><br>>> Mike Mueller<br>>><br>>> Customer Services<br>>><br>>> F3AUnlimited<br>>><br>>> <br>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------<br>>> ---<br>>><br>>> *From:* Gordon Seeling ><br>>> *To:* nsrca-discussion@lists.nsrca.org<br>>> *Sent:* Monday, September 30, 2013 6:59 AM<br>>> *Subject:* [NSRCA-discussion] nsrca shutdown???<br>>><br>>><br>>> toooo quiet!!!<br>>> _______________________________________________<br>>> NSRCA-discussion mailing list<br>>> NSRCA-discussion@lists.nsrca.org<br>>> http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion<br>>><br>>> _______________________________________________<br>>> NSRCA-discussion mailing list<br>>> NSRCA-discussion@lists.nsrca.org<br>>> http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion<br>>><br>>><br>>> _______________________________________________ NSRCA-discussion <br>>> mailing list NSRCA-discussion@lists.nsrca.org <br>>> http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion<br>>><br>>> _______________________________________________<br>>> NSRCA-discussion mailing list<br>>> NSRCA-discussion@lists.nsrca.org<br>>> http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion<br>>><br>>><br>>> _______________________________________________<br>>> NSRCA-discussion mailing list<br>>> NSRCA-discussion@lists.nsrca.org<br>>> http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion<br>> -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was <br>> scrubbed...<br>> URL:<br>> ------------------------------<br>><br>> _______________________________________________<br>> NSRCA-discussion mailing list<br>> NSRCA-discussion@lists.nsrca.org<br>> http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion<br>><br>> End of NSRCA-discussion Digest, Vol 95, Issue 1<br>> ***********************************************<br>><br>_______________________________________________<br>NSRCA-discussion mailing list<br>NSRCA-discussion@lists.nsrca.org<br>http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion<br><br>_______________________________________________<br>NSRCA-discussion mailing list<br>NSRCA-discussion@lists.nsrca.org<br>http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion<br></body>