<div dir="ltr">+1 -- I'd totally pay extra on my NSRCA dues to support FAI participation even though I have less chance of participating at the FAI level than I do of ruling the world...<div><br></div><div style>Peter+</div>
</div><div class="gmail_extra"><br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Tue, Mar 12, 2013 at 7:20 PM, Bill's Email <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:silentav8r@cox.net" target="_blank">silentav8r@cox.net</a>></span> wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">The reason I posted the EC Minutes links was so people could get a sense of the thought process the AMA is using to make these decisions. FAI participation is a tiny slice of the total AMA membership and it does not strike me as unreasonable that they are thinking along the lines they are. I may not like it, but I can see where they are coming from.<br>
<br>
I like the NSRCA budget possibility. I know I'd happily pay $10 more per year knowing it was going to support the representation for FAI with any excess going to the Team. I don't fly FAI, and probably never will, and if I did would have less than no chance of making a Team. But that does not mean that we do not have a stake in what goes on.<br>
<br>
That's my 2 cents worth.<span class="HOEnZb"><font color="#888888"><br>
<br>
Bill</font></span><div class="im HOEnZb"><br>
<br>
<br>
On 3/12/13 5:12 PM, Atwood, Mark wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
We can run off and vilify the AMA over this, but I think some of the reality is that there are soooooo many niche's in the FAI program that trying to determine how to completely support them all is financially impractical in this day and age. Yes, we're one of the pillars, but our total participation at the FAI level is actually VERY low. I think a total of 10 people this past cycle. That in itself is a problem, but regardless, it become difficult for the AMA to support sending a rep for every FAI program that has 10 paying participants. I just checked.. .we had 11 participants in 2012 and 11 in 2010. Control line scale had about the same.<br>
<br>
We should strongly consider trying to work this into the NSRCA budget in some way. It's important to us collectively, regardless of the total number that actually pay for an FAI stamp. They lead the program that we follow, and establish all the rules for our international competitions. It's important that we (the NSRCA) have a voice at the table.<br>
<br>
Just my $0.02<br>
<br>
<br>
Mark Atwood<br>
Paragon Consulting, Inc. | President<br>
5885 Landerbrook Drive Suite 130, Cleveland Ohio, 44124<br>
Phone: <a href="tel:440.684.3101%20x102" value="+14406843101" target="_blank">440.684.3101 x102</a> | Direct: <a href="tel:440-229-2502" value="+14402292502" target="_blank">440-229-2502</a><br>
Fax: <a href="tel:440.684.3102" value="+14406843102" target="_blank">440.684.3102</a><br>
<a href="mailto:mark.atwood@paragon-inc.com" target="_blank">mark.atwood@paragon-inc.com</a><<u></u>mailto:<a href="mailto:mark.atwood@paragon-inc.com" target="_blank">mark.atwood@paragon-<u></u>inc.com</a>> | <a href="http://www.paragon-inc.com" target="_blank">www.paragon-inc.com</a><<a href="http://www.paragon-inc.com/" target="_blank">http://<u></u>www.paragon-inc.com/</a>><br>
<br>
</blockquote>
<br></div><div class="HOEnZb"><div class="h5">
______________________________<u></u>_________________<br>
NSRCA-discussion mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:NSRCA-discussion@lists.nsrca.org" target="_blank">NSRCA-discussion@lists.nsrca.<u></u>org</a><br>
<a href="http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion" target="_blank">http://lists.nsrca.org/<u></u>mailman/listinfo/nsrca-<u></u>discussion</a><br>
</div></div></blockquote></div><br><br clear="all"><div><br></div>-- <br><div>Director, Fixed Wing Flight Training</div><div>Santa Clara County Model Aircraft Skypark</div><img src="http://farm8.staticflickr.com/7163/6513778381_5569cc985d_m.jpg" width="200" height="154"><br>
</div>