<div>Here's the info from the AMA manual:</div><div><font></font> </div><div><font>"The first radius of a maneuver does not define the radii for the remaining radii of a maneuver but it is a starting point. As the maneuver progresses, the judge will compare each radius that was just flown to the last radius flown and if there is a difference, then a downgrade will be given based on the severity of the difference."</font></div>
<div><font></font> </div><div><font>FAI is "first, AMA is "next"</font></div><div><font></font> </div><div><font>So , yes, it would not matter in a half reverse as it only has two radii, but a full Cuban it would.. </font></div>
<font></font><br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Mon, Feb 25, 2013 at 6:00 PM, Stuart Chale <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:schale1@verizon.net" target="_blank">schale1@verizon.net</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;padding-left:1ex;border-left-color:rgb(204,204,204);border-left-width:1px;border-left-style:solid" class="gmail_quote">
<div bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000">
Isn't it the reverse? In AMA the first radius sets the radii for
the rest of the maneuver.<br>
And yes Jim the pull up radius has to be the same as the loop
portion.<br>
<br>
Stuart C.<div><div class="h5"><br>
<br>
<div>On 2/25/2013 8:55 PM, Patrick Harris
wrote:<br>
</div>
</div></div><blockquote type="cite"><div><div class="h5">In FAI, the "<strong>first"</strong> radius of the
maneuver establishes all radius's of the maneuver. In AMA classes,
the last radius flown in the maneuver establishes the radius of
the next (radius) in the maneuver. . <br>
<br>
<div class="gmail_quote">On Mon, Feb 25, 2013 at 5:00 PM, James
Oddino <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:joddino@socal.rr.com" target="_blank">joddino@socal.rr.com</a>></span>
wrote:<br>
<blockquote style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;padding-left:1ex;border-left-color:rgb(204,204,204);border-left-width:1px;border-left-style:solid" class="gmail_quote">
<div style="word-wrap:break-word">How about the radii in a
half reverse cuban eight turnaround? Does the radius of the
loop have to be the same as the radius of the pull to 45
degrees?
<div><br>
</div>
<div>Jim O</div>
<div>
<br>
</div>
<div><br>
<div>
<div>On Feb 24, 2013, at 7:13 PM, <a href="mailto:tocdon@netscape.net" target="_blank">tocdon@netscape.net</a>
wrote:</div>
<br>
<blockquote type="cite"><font color="black" face="arial">
<div><font style="background-color:transparent">A
question on radius judging. Tight radius (or
loose radius) manevuer segments are subject to
downgrade in FAI. What constitutes a tight
radius? Physically tight (in feet, for
example), or tight (fast speed through the
radius giving the impression that the plane is
pulling excessive g's, however that is
interpreted). A slow flying radius could be
extremely tight, for example the last radius
at the bottom of the triangle loop (135 degree
pull) or figure Z.<br>
</font></div>
<div><font style="background-color:transparent">Best
regards,</font></div>
<div><font style="background-color:transparent">Don</font></div>
<font style="background-color:transparent">
</font></font>_______________________________________________<br>
NSRCA-discussion mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:NSRCA-discussion@lists.nsrca.org" target="_blank">NSRCA-discussion@lists.nsrca.org</a><br>
<a href="http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion" target="_blank">http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion</a></blockquote>
</div>
<br>
</div>
</div>
<br>
_______________________________________________<br>
NSRCA-discussion mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:NSRCA-discussion@lists.nsrca.org" target="_blank">NSRCA-discussion@lists.nsrca.org</a><br>
<a href="http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion" target="_blank">http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion</a><br>
</blockquote>
</div>
<br>
<br>
<fieldset></fieldset>
<br>
<pre>_______________________________________________
NSRCA-discussion mailing list
<a href="mailto:NSRCA-discussion@lists.nsrca.org" target="_blank">NSRCA-discussion@lists.nsrca.org</a>
<a href="http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion" target="_blank">http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion</a>
</pre>
<br>
<fieldset></fieldset>
<br>
</div></div><p align="left" color="#000000">No virus
found in this message.<br>
Checked by AVG - <a href="http://www.avg.com" target="_blank">www.avg.com</a><br>
Version: 2013.0.2899 / Virus Database: 2639/6103 - Release Date:
02/14/13<br>
Internal Virus Database is out of date.</p>
</blockquote>
<br>
</div>
<br>_______________________________________________<br>
NSRCA-discussion mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:NSRCA-discussion@lists.nsrca.org">NSRCA-discussion@lists.nsrca.org</a><br>
<a href="http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion" target="_blank">http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion</a><br></blockquote></div><br>