<div>Boy jim,</div><div>I have to give you credit. When you get the shell completely enclosed do you </div><div>glass the outside? For me, it's difficult to build conventionally and still achieve</div><div>ultra light results. I like the way you rise to a challenge.</div>
<div>G.</div><div> </div><div> </div><div><br><br> </div><div class="gmail_quote">On Thu, Jan 3, 2013 at 4:02 PM, J N Hiller <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:jnhiller@earthlink.net" target="_blank">jnhiller@earthlink.net</a>></span> wrote:<br>
<blockquote style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;padding-left:1ex;border-left-color:rgb(204,204,204);border-left-width:1px;border-left-style:solid" class="gmail_quote">Georgie I'll get off that other thread.<br>
<br>
I forgot to mention that I included a photo on the previous reply. They need<br>
to be reduced quit a bit to include here so I don't know how well the detail<br>
shows up.<br>
<br>
No vacuum bagging, standard construction except for the pre-formed sheet<br>
used to close in the T & B quarter sections. Fitting the edges over the glue<br>
backers is kind of a pain. This construction is very similar to the glow<br>
version which used 1/8 pre-formed sheet but without a lot of internal<br>
structure. The balsa parts are formed over a foam plug. Photos attached.<br>
A primary objective when detailing the E-version was to locate the batteries<br>
at or very near the CG positioning the wing as needed.<br>
I'm up to 131 KB, hope this goes.<br>
Jim<br>
<br>_______________________________________________<br>
NSRCA-discussion mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:NSRCA-discussion@lists.nsrca.org">NSRCA-discussion@lists.nsrca.org</a><br>
<a href="http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion" target="_blank">http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion</a><br></blockquote></div><br>