<html><head><style type="text/css"><!-- DIV {margin:0px;} --></style></head><body><div style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif;font-size:10pt"><div>Bill Ahrens and I ran the Rhino 6S/4S 4900's and had pretty much the same experience. We hoped they would be more robust because they are rated 25C vs. 20C for the 5S. They ran good, had good power, but puffed and went south sooner. I bought 2 shipsets in the spring and ended up retiring them both before the end of the season. First batteries I've owned that didn't make it one full season. There was a period where I had stopped flying the 6S/4S Rhino packs, even for practice. But was still flying a Rhino 5S/5S from 2011. I charged them as 10S and they always balanced well, but with higher IR's than the 5S/5S. I don't think this had to do with the 6S/4S combination, just the 25C cells were not as good as the 20C. I think the combination is OK, but I wouldn't recommend the
Rhino 4900's.<br><br>Ed<br></div><div style="font-family:arial, helvetica, sans-serif;font-size:10pt"><br><div style="font-family:times new roman, new york, times, serif;font-size:12pt"><font face="Tahoma" size="2"><hr size="1"><b><span style="font-weight: bold;">From:</span></b> Bob Pastorello <rpasto513@gmail.com><br><b><span style="font-weight: bold;">To:</span></b> PatternList <nsrca-discussion@lists.nsrca.org><br><b><span style="font-weight: bold;">Sent:</span></b> Mon, December 10, 2012 9:18:07 AM<br><b><span style="font-weight: bold;">Subject:</span></b> [NSRCA-discussion] 6S+4S-Good or Bad?<br></font><br>
<p>Wondering if anyone has run these instead of 10s, and were results different from 2x 5S setups?</p>
</div></div>
</div></body></html>