<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD>
<META content="text/html; charset=iso-8859-1" http-equiv=Content-Type>
<META name=GENERATOR content="MSHTML 8.00.6001.19328">
<STYLE></STYLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY bgColor=#ffffff>
<DIV><FONT size=2 face=Arial>I have 10S, 8S, and 6S electric pattern style
planes. I buy only 5S and 3S packs and can mix and match to fly all of them with
the needed combinations. I do buy all the same C ratings and Mah
capacity for these packs though. It's been working OK for 2-3 years for
me.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2 face=Arial>Dave</FONT></DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE
style="BORDER-LEFT: #000000 2px solid; PADDING-LEFT: 5px; PADDING-RIGHT: 0px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px"
dir=ltr>
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial">----- Original Message ----- </DIV>
<DIV
style="FONT: 10pt arial; BACKGROUND: #e4e4e4; font-color: black"><B>From:</B>
<A title=mikemueller@f3aunlimited.com
href="mailto:mikemueller@f3aunlimited.com">mike mueller</A> </DIV>
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial"><B>To:</B> <A
title=nsrca-discussion@lists.nsrca.org
href="mailto:nsrca-discussion@lists.nsrca.org">General pattern discussion</A>
</DIV>
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Sent:</B> Monday, December 10, 2012 2:30
PM</DIV>
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Subject:</B> Re: [NSRCA-discussion]
6S+4S-Good or Bad?</DIV>
<DIV><BR></DIV>
<DIV
style="BACKGROUND-COLOR: #fff; FONT-FAMILY: times new roman, new york, times, serif; COLOR: #000; FONT-SIZE: 12pt">
<DIV style="RIGHT: auto"><SPAN style="RIGHT: auto"> Great point Mark<VAR
id=yui-ie-cursor></VAR><BR style="RIGHT: auto" class=yui-cursor></SPAN></DIV>
<DIV><BR></DIV>
<DIV
style="FONT-FAMILY: times new roman, new york, times, serif; FONT-SIZE: 12pt">
<DIV
style="FONT-FAMILY: times new roman, new york, times, serif; FONT-SIZE: 12pt">
<DIV dir=ltr><FONT size=2 face=Arial>
<DIV
style="BORDER-BOTTOM: #ccc 1px solid; BORDER-LEFT: #ccc 1px solid; PADDING-BOTTOM: 0px; LINE-HEIGHT: 0; MARGIN: 5px 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 0px; PADDING-RIGHT: 0px; HEIGHT: 0px; FONT-SIZE: 0px; BORDER-TOP: #ccc 1px solid; BORDER-RIGHT: #ccc 1px solid; PADDING-TOP: 0px"
class=hr contentEditable=false readonly="true"></DIV><B><SPAN
style="FONT-WEIGHT: bold">From:</SPAN></B> "Atwood, Mark" <<A
href="mailto:atwoodm@paragon-inc.com">atwoodm@paragon-inc.com</A>><BR><B><SPAN
style="FONT-WEIGHT: bold">To:</SPAN></B> General pattern discussion <<A
href="mailto:nsrca-discussion@lists.nsrca.org">nsrca-discussion@lists.nsrca.org</A>>
<BR><B><SPAN style="FONT-WEIGHT: bold">Sent:</SPAN></B> Monday, December 10,
2012 1:29 PM<BR><B><SPAN style="FONT-WEIGHT: bold">Subject:</SPAN></B> Re:
[NSRCA-discussion] 6S+4S-Good or Bad?<BR></FONT></DIV><BR>I think this would
be my biggest concern, that while the packs might be labeled the same (same
MAH and C rating) that the interncal cells might actually vary more between 4s
and 6s configurations than they would with identical 5s pack. Different
production runs, etc.<BR><BR>Theoretically though there should be no
difference.<BR><BR><BR>Mark Atwood<BR>Paragon Consulting, Inc. |
President<BR>5885 Landerbrook Drive Suite 130, Cleveland Ohio, 44124<BR>Phone:
440.684.3101 x102 | Fax: 440.684.3102<BR><A
href="mailto:mark.atwood@paragon-inc.com"
ymailto="mailto:mark.atwood@paragon-inc.com">mark.atwood@paragon-inc.com</A><mailto:<A
href="mailto:mark.atwood@paragon-inc.com"
ymailto="mailto:mark.atwood@paragon-inc.com">mark.atwood@paragon-inc.com</A>>
| www.paragon-inc.com<<A href="http://www.paragon-inc.com/"
target=_blank>http://www.paragon-inc.com/</A>><BR><BR><BR><BR><BR>On Dec
10, 2012, at 11:54 AM, Bill's Email wrote:<BR><BR>Yes, just like when using
two 5S packs in series you must use the same capacity and "C"
rating.<BR><BR><BR>On 12/10/12 8:39 AM, J N Hiller wrote:<BR>Same capacity and
C rating also???<BR>Jim<BR><BR>-----Original Message-----<BR>From: <A
href="mailto:nsrca-discussion-bounces@lists.nsrca.org"
ymailto="mailto:nsrca-discussion-bounces@lists.nsrca.org">nsrca-discussion-bounces@lists.nsrca.org</A><mailto:<A
href="mailto:nsrca-discussion-bounces@lists.nsrca.org"
ymailto="mailto:nsrca-discussion-bounces@lists.nsrca.org">nsrca-discussion-bounces@lists.nsrca.org</A>>
[mailto:<A href="mailto:nsrca-discussion-bounces@lists.nsrca.org"
ymailto="mailto:nsrca-discussion-bounces@lists.nsrca.org">nsrca-discussion-bounces@lists.nsrca.org</A>]On
Behalf Of <A href="mailto:atwooddon@aol.com"
ymailto="mailto:atwooddon@aol.com">atwooddon@aol.com</A><mailto:<A
href="mailto:atwooddon@aol.com"
ymailto="mailto:atwooddon@aol.com">atwooddon@aol.com</A>><BR>Sent: Monday,
December 10, 2012 7:40 AM<BR>To: <A
href="mailto:nsrca-discussion@lists.nsrca.org"
ymailto="mailto:nsrca-discussion@lists.nsrca.org">nsrca-discussion@lists.nsrca.org</A><mailto:<A
href="mailto:nsrca-discussion@lists.nsrca.org"
ymailto="mailto:nsrca-discussion@lists.nsrca.org">nsrca-discussion@lists.nsrca.org</A>><BR>Subject:
Re: [NSRCA-discussion] 6S+4S-Good or Bad?<BR><BR>Hey Bob<BR><BR>There should
be no difference in performance compared to 2 5S setup. Obviously, charging is
different due to unequal cell counts in packs, but to the ESC, it looks like a
10S pack when you connect a 6S and a 4S in
series.<BR><BR>Don<BR><BR><BR><BR>-----Original Message-----<BR>From: Bob
Pastorello <<A href="mailto:rpasto513@gmail.com"
ymailto="mailto:rpasto513@gmail.com">rpasto513@gmail.com</A>><mailto:<A
href="mailto:rpasto513@gmail.com"
ymailto="mailto:rpasto513@gmail.com">rpasto513@gmail.com</A>><BR>To:
PatternList <<A href="mailto:nsrca-discussion@lists.nsrca.org"
ymailto="mailto:nsrca-discussion@lists.nsrca.org">nsrca-discussion@lists.nsrca.org</A>><mailto:<A
href="mailto:nsrca-discussion@lists.nsrca.org"
ymailto="mailto:nsrca-discussion@lists.nsrca.org">nsrca-discussion@lists.nsrca.org</A>><BR>Sent:
Mon, Dec 10, 2012 7:18 am<BR>Subject: [NSRCA-discussion] 6S+4S-Good or
Bad?<BR>Wondering if anyone has run these instead of 10s, and were results
different from 2x 5S
setups?<BR><BR><BR><BR><BR>_______________________________________________<BR><BR>NSRCA-discussion
mailing list<BR><BR><A href="mailto:NSRCA-discussion@lists.nsrca.org"
ymailto="mailto:NSRCA-discussion@lists.nsrca.org">NSRCA-discussion@lists.nsrca.org</A><mailto:<A
href="mailto:NSRCA-discussion@lists.nsrca.org"
ymailto="mailto:NSRCA-discussion@lists.nsrca.org">NSRCA-discussion@lists.nsrca.org</A>><BR><BR>http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion<BR><BR><BR><BR>_______________________________________________<BR>NSRCA-discussion
mailing list<BR><A href="mailto:NSRCA-discussion@lists.nsrca.org"
ymailto="mailto:NSRCA-discussion@lists.nsrca.org">NSRCA-discussion@lists.nsrca.org</A><mailto:<A
href="mailto:NSRCA-discussion@lists.nsrca.org"
ymailto="mailto:NSRCA-discussion@lists.nsrca.org">NSRCA-discussion@lists.nsrca.org</A>><BR><A
href="http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion"
target=_blank>http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion</A><BR><BR>_______________________________________________<BR>NSRCA-discussion
mailing list<BR><A href="mailto:NSRCA-discussion@lists.nsrca.org"
ymailto="mailto:NSRCA-discussion@lists.nsrca.org">NSRCA-discussion@lists.nsrca.org</A><mailto:<A
href="mailto:NSRCA-discussion@lists.nsrca.org"
ymailto="mailto:NSRCA-discussion@lists.nsrca.org">NSRCA-discussion@lists.nsrca.org</A>><BR><A
href="http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion"
target=_blank>http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion</A><BR><BR>_______________________________________________<BR>NSRCA-discussion
mailing list<BR><A href="mailto:NSRCA-discussion@lists.nsrca.org"
ymailto="mailto:NSRCA-discussion@lists.nsrca.org">NSRCA-discussion@lists.nsrca.org</A><BR><A
href="http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion"
target=_blank>http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion</A><BR><BR><BR></DIV></DIV></DIV>
<P>
<HR>
<P></P>_______________________________________________<BR>NSRCA-discussion
mailing
list<BR>NSRCA-discussion@lists.nsrca.org<BR>http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
<P>
<HR>
<P></P><A></A>
<P align=left color="#000000" avgcert??>No virus found in this
message.<BR>Checked by AVG - <A
href="http://www.avg.com">www.avg.com</A><BR>Version: 2013.0.2805 / Virus
Database: 2634/5947 - Release Date: 12/09/12</P></BLOCKQUOTE></BODY></HTML>