<html><head></head><body bgcolor="#FFFFFF"><div>Really? Masters is staying as is? I had kind of hoped there would changes towards the end for better positioning, both for flying and judging. Specifically 15, 16, and 17. </div><div><br></div><div><br><br>Sent from my iPhone</div><div><br>On Jul 31, 2012, at 3:04 PM, Scott McHarg <<a href="mailto:scmcharg@gmail.com">scmcharg@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<br><br></div><div></div><blockquote type="cite"><div>Good afternoon all,<br> The Board of Directors approved the proposed Advanced and Masters sequences for the 2013-2014 cycle today. These sequences may be found on the NSRCA website. They have not been altered since the first part of June and will stand as such. Many thanks go to Dale Olstinske, Larry Kauffman, Verne Koester, Derek Koopowitz, Dave Lockhart, Jon Lowe and John Gayer for providing two great sequences for the next cycle. We would also like to thank all those who took the time to provide input and give feedback as the sequences progressed to their current and final versions. Thanks also to Joe Lachowski for beginning this journey. We hope you all enjoy their endeavors.<br>
<br>Warmest Regards,<br>Scott<br clear="all"><br>-- <br><b style="color:rgb(51,51,255)"><font style="font-family:comic sans ms,sans-serif" size="4">Scott A. McHarg</font></b><br>Sr. Systems Engineer - Infrastructure<br><br>
</div></blockquote><blockquote type="cite"><div><span>_______________________________________________</span><br><span>NSRCA-discussion mailing list</span><br><span><a href="mailto:NSRCA-discussion@lists.nsrca.org">NSRCA-discussion@lists.nsrca.org</a></span><br><span><a href="http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion">http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion</a></span></div></blockquote></body></html>